Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd.
Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd. FXCOF Peers
See (FXCOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXCOF | $1.76 | N/A | 2.49B | 17.60 | $0.10 | +2.63% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | -15.58% | 295.12B | 10.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| CAJFF | $33.29 | +2.04% | 30.77B | 28.95 | $1.15 | +2.92% |
| CAJPY | $32.27 | +1.16% | 30.01B | 28.06 | $1.15 | +2.81% |
| LNVGY | $26.14 | +9.33% | 16.33B | 13.98 | $1.87 | +3.69% |
| LNVGF | $1.29 | +6.02% | 15.94B | 14.28 | $0.09 | +3.84% |
| ASUUY | $98.69 | N/A | 14.66B | 13.73 | $7.19 | +2.62% |
| SEKEY | $6.79 | +0.30% | 4.41B | 11.51 | $0.59 | +3.04% |
| SEKEF | $12.95 | N/A | 4.15B | 11.07 | $1.17 | +3.88% |
| ACEYY | $5.14 | N/A | 3.42B | 34.27 | $0.15 | +0.15% |
Stock Comparison
FXCOF vs QUCCF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 295.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs CAJFF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 30.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CAJFF trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs CAJPY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CAJPY has a market cap of 30.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CAJPY trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CAJPY's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to CAJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs LNVGY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 16.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while LNVGY trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs LNVGF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while LNVGF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs ASUUY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs SEKEY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while SEKEY trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs SEKEF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while SEKEF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs ACEYY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs TSHTY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while TSHTY trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs LGNRF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while LGNRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and LGNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs DRSHF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 787.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while DRSHF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 90.10. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs WACMF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 585.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while WACMF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs JFEYF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 584.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while JFEYF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and JFEYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs WACMY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 524.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while WACMY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs PCPPF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs AOMUF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and AOMUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs SCTQ Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and SCTQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs FRIIF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs XAARF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 76.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while XAARF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs TBIIF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 73.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while TBIIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs TAKOF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 48.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while TAKOF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs CREAF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 47.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CREAF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs AOTOF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and AOTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs PRWYF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 31.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while PRWYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs AITX Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 22.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs EVRC Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while EVRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and EVRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs CCUR Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CCUR trades at $1,876.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs VIDE Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while VIDE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIDE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs VRTK Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while VRTK trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and VRTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs FNTTF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 2.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while FNTTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs TKSTF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and TKSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs JLMKF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919322.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and JLMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs YRLLF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 632116.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while YRLLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs ITOX Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 532299.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs DDDX Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 504152.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and DDDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs CRTG Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 215843.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs DWDZF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 204960.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs HAUP Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123488.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and HAUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs GOSY Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82500.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and GOSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs EUOT Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 47963.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs RDRSF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17721.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs SNIOF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11252.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs NADA Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10437.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NADA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs VMRI Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 6957.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs CBEX Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2343.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF and CBEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FXCOF vs VOIS Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 1777.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs MCZAF Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs SOSO Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.
FXCOF vs MDEA Comparison
FXCOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCOF stands at 2.49B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 132.00. Regarding current trading prices, FXCOF is priced at $1.76, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCOF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCOF is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCOF.