FIH Mobile Limited

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ERIXF trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while NOKBF trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ZTCOF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AACAY trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AACAF trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while HMNKF trades at $42.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while EUTLF trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ETCMY trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VTKLF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VTKLY trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ADVOF trades at $24.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to HTCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while UBLXF trades at $133.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while OKIEY trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while EVTZF trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 648.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while COBJF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while EVSBY trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while SATOF trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SATOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to SATOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 449.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while PAOTF trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 447.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while FLTCF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VNWTF trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while SIMTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while QTRHF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to NPNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while BEWFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ELSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ASROF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ASROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while WSTL trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CYSNF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while KPIFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VMNT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while MILOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to MILOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ATGN trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while MOYFF trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CYCA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to LTCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while TTLTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while STRH trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while HPNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while WLAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while NVRVF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to NVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ISEYF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while NRRWF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while LMGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CNTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while MFCO trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while TPTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 534.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while BDRL trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 375.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CRMK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 346.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ELST trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while BKSD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to BKSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 245.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while MLRT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 224.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 192.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while WGNR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 178K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VCTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ERFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ERFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while PDXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FXCNY has daily volatility of 137.04 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to PMOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CRLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CRLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while IPTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while LTTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while FBCE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while OTOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to OTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while UTRK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while JUMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AVSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to AVSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while MPEG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while WIRX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while CYBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to CYBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while VRCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while IZNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while PRXM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to PRXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while RPDT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while RITT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ABILF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to ABILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 371. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while TCCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to TCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while GNRD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to GNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while ORSX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while HDIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to HDIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while LMSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to LMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while STCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to STCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while BETW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while DGIV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.

FXCNY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FXCNY stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNY is priced at $11.51, while AXCP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FXCNY currently has a P/E ratio of -44.27, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNY is more volatile compared to AXCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNY.