FIH Mobile Limited
FIH Mobile Limited (FXCNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FXCNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXCNF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 1.4B | -41.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ZTCOF | $3.65 | +29.89% | 25B | 15.21 | $0.24 | +2.35% |
| ERIXF | $7.30 | +1.96% | 24.5B | 13.77 | $0.53 | +3.74% |
| NOKBF | $4.06 | +2.27% | 21.8B | 22.56 | $0.18 | +3.80% |
| FXCNY | $11.51 | +0.00% | 18.8B | -44.27 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| YZOFF | $1.97 | +91.26% | 7.8B | 9.38 | $0.21 | +0.26% |
| AACAF | $6.44 | +29.32% | 7.6B | 30.67 | $0.21 | +0.48% |
| AACAY | $5.11 | +1.59% | 6B | 24.31 | $0.21 | +0.60% |
| HMNKF | $42.20 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 56.27 | $0.75 | N/A |
| VTKLY | $7.33 | +2.37% | 1.9B | 11.82 | $0.62 | +6.89% |
Stock Comparison
FXCNF vs ZTCOF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ZTCOF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ZTCOF's competition here
FXCNF vs ERIXF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ERIXF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ERIXF's competition here
FXCNF vs NOKBF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while NOKBF trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check NOKBF's competition here
FXCNF vs FXCNY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while FXCNY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check FXCNY's competition here
FXCNF vs YZOFF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while YZOFF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check YZOFF's competition here
FXCNF vs AACAF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AACAF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AACAF's competition here
FXCNF vs AACAY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AACAY trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AACAY's competition here
FXCNF vs HMNKF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while HMNKF trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 56.27. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check HMNKF's competition here
FXCNF vs VTKLY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VTKLY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VTKLY's competition here
FXCNF vs VTKLF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VTKLF trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VTKLF's competition here
FXCNF vs EUTLF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while EUTLF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check EUTLF's competition here
FXCNF vs ETCMY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ETCMY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ETCMY's competition here
FXCNF vs ADVOF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ADVOF trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -17.96. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ADVOF's competition here
FXCNF vs HTCKF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to HTCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check HTCKF's competition here
FXCNF vs UBLXF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 959.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while UBLXF trades at $126.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check UBLXF's competition here
FXCNF vs OKIEY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 893.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while OKIEY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check OKIEY's competition here
FXCNF vs EVTZF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while EVTZF trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check EVTZF's competition here
FXCNF vs EVSBY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 659.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while EVSBY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check EVSBY's competition here
FXCNF vs OKIEF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while OKIEF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check OKIEF's competition here
FXCNF vs SATOF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 550.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while SATOF trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SATOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to SATOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check SATOF's competition here
FXCNF vs COBJF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 478.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while COBJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check COBJF's competition here
FXCNF vs FLTCF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 438.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while FLTCF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check FLTCF's competition here
FXCNF vs PAOTF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while PAOTF trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -31.18. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check PAOTF's competition here
FXCNF vs VNWTF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VNWTF trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 68.73. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VNWTF's competition here
FXCNF vs QTRHF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while QTRHF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check QTRHF's competition here
FXCNF vs ATSKF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ATSKF's competition here
FXCNF vs NPNZF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to NPNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check NPNZF's competition here
FXCNF vs SIMTF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while SIMTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check SIMTF's competition here
FXCNF vs BEWFF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while BEWFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check BEWFF's competition here
FXCNF vs ELSLF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ELSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ELSLF's competition here
FXCNF vs ENAFF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ENAFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ENAFF's competition here
FXCNF vs ASROF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ASROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ASROF's competition here
FXCNF vs WSTL Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while WSTL trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check WSTL's competition here
FXCNF vs BYLTF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while BYLTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check BYLTF's competition here
FXCNF vs CYSNF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CYSNF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -65.76. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CYSNF's competition here
FXCNF vs MOYFF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while MOYFF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check MOYFF's competition here
FXCNF vs LMGR Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check LMGR's competition here
FXCNF vs VMNT Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VMNT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VMNT's competition here
FXCNF vs MILOF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to MILOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check MILOF's competition here
FXCNF vs KPIFF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check KPIFF's competition here
FXCNF vs ATGN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ATGN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ATGN's competition here
FXCNF vs CYCA Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CYCA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CYCA's competition here
FXCNF vs LTCCF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to LTCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check LTCCF's competition here
FXCNF vs ISEYF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ISEYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ISEYF's competition here
FXCNF vs TTLTF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while TTLTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check TTLTF's competition here
FXCNF vs STRH Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check STRH's competition here
FXCNF vs WLAN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check WLAN's competition here
FXCNF vs HPNN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check HPNN's competition here
FXCNF vs NVRVF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while NVRVF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to NVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check NVRVF's competition here
FXCNF vs JUMT Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while JUMT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check JUMT's competition here
FXCNF vs CNTFY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CNTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CNTFY's competition here
FXCNF vs NRRWF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while NRRWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check NRRWF's competition here
FXCNF vs MFCO Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 943.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while MFCO trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check MFCO's competition here
FXCNF vs TPTW Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check TPTW's competition here
FXCNF vs VCTY Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 479.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VCTY's competition here
FXCNF vs AXBSF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AXBSF's competition here
FXCNF vs BDRL Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 401.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while BDRL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check BDRL's competition here
FXCNF vs CRMK Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 375.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CRMK's competition here
FXCNF vs IZNN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 370.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check IZNN's competition here
FXCNF vs WGNR Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 298.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check WGNR's competition here
FXCNF vs BKSD Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to BKSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check BKSD's competition here
FXCNF vs ATCLF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 269.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ATCLF's competition here
FXCNF vs AAPJ Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 178K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AAPJ's competition here
FXCNF vs MLRT Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 169.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while MLRT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check MLRT's competition here
FXCNF vs CAMPQ Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CAMPQ's competition here
FXCNF vs ERFB Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ERFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ERFB's competition here
FXCNF vs PDXP Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check PDXP's competition here
FXCNF vs EZEN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FXCNF has daily volatility of 175.09 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EZEN's competition here
FXCNF vs PMOZ Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to PMOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check PMOZ's competition here
FXCNF vs ELST Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 64.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ELST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ELST's competition here
FXCNF vs CRLI Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CRLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CRLI's competition here
FXCNF vs IPTK Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check IPTK's competition here
FXCNF vs WIRX Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 26.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while WIRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check WIRX's competition here
FXCNF vs ETCIA Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ETCIA's competition here
FXCNF vs UTRK Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 23.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check UTRK's competition here
FXCNF vs FBCE Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check FBCE's competition here
FXCNF vs LTTC Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check LTTC's competition here
FXCNF vs OTOW Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to OTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check OTOW's competition here
FXCNF vs RPDT Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check RPDT's competition here
FXCNF vs AVSR Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to AVSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AVSR's competition here
FXCNF vs MPEG Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check MPEG's competition here
FXCNF vs CYBD Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to CYBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check CYBD's competition here
FXCNF vs RITT Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check RITT's competition here
FXCNF vs VRCM Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check VRCM's competition here
FXCNF vs PRXM Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to PRXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check PRXM's competition here
FXCNF vs ZSTN Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ZSTN's competition here
FXCNF vs XCOMQ Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check XCOMQ's competition here
FXCNF vs ABILF Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to ABILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ABILF's competition here
FXCNF vs TCCO Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 371. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to TCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check TCCO's competition here
FXCNF vs GNRD Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to GNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check GNRD's competition here
FXCNF vs ZTNO Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ZTNO's competition here
FXCNF vs ORSX Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check ORSX's competition here
FXCNF vs BETW Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 83. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check BETW's competition here
FXCNF vs HDIH Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to HDIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check HDIH's competition here
FXCNF vs LMSC Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to LMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check LMSC's competition here
FXCNF vs STCI Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to STCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check STCI's competition here
FXCNF vs DGIV Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check DGIV's competition here
FXCNF vs AXCP Comparison August 2025
FXCNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXCNF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FXCNF is priced at $1.25, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXCNF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.67, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FXCNF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FXCNF is more volatile compared to AXCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXCNF.Check AXCP's competition here