Forvia SE
Forvia SE FURCF Peers
See (FURCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FURCF | $10.58 | +0.03% | 2.1B | -9.53 | -$1.11 | N/A |
FYGGY | $1.53 | +0.00% | 49B | 13.91 | $0.11 | +7.03% |
DNZOF | $14.69 | +7.46% | 41.4B | 14.69 | $1.00 | +4.18% |
DNZOY | $13.37 | +0.45% | 37.7B | 13.37 | $1.00 | +1.78% |
BRDCF | $44.27 | +0.00% | 30B | 16.16 | $2.74 | +4.69% |
MGDDF | $39.49 | +7.46% | 27.9B | 3.54 | $11.17 | +7.65% |
BRDCY | $20.49 | -0.05% | 27.8B | 14.63 | $1.40 | +2.16% |
MGDDY | $18.78 | -1.42% | 26.5B | 8.41 | $2.23 | +7.89% |
CTTAF | $91.89 | -0.90% | 18.4B | 13.67 | $6.72 | +5.41% |
CTTAY | $9.11 | -0.65% | 18.2B | 13.20 | $0.69 | +4.84% |
Stock Comparison
FURCF vs FYGGY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while FYGGY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs DNZOF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while DNZOF trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs DNZOY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while DNZOY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs BRDCF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while BRDCF trades at $44.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and BRDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MGDDF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MGDDF trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and MGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs BRDCY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while BRDCY trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs MGDDY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MGDDY trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs CTTAF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CTTAF trades at $91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs CTTAY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CTTAY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs SMTOY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SMTOY trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs KNRRY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while KNRRY trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs KNBHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while KNBHF trades at $97.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and KNBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs PTAIF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while PTAIF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and PTAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs PTAIY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while PTAIY trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs HLLGY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while HLLGY trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and HLLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs HLKHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and HLKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ASEKY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ASEKY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs ASEKF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs PLLIF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while PLLIF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and PLLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NGKSF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs NGKSY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NGKSY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs SFFLY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SFFLY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs YORUY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while YORUY trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and YORUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs YORUF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs BRBOY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs SCFLF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs KOTMY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while KOTMY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and KOTMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MNTHY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MNTHY trades at $59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and MNTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs KOTMF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and KOTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs STAEY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and STAEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs SMTUF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SMTUF trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -40.47. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs BRBOF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while BRBOF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and BRBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs STAEF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs LIMAF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while LIMAF trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and LIMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs VLEEF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while VLEEF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and VLEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs VLEEY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while VLEEY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs JELCF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and JELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NHKGF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NHKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs TGOSY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while TGOSY trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and TGOSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs TDBOF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NPSKY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NPSKY trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs VTSCF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NIFCY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NIFCY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MNTHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and MNTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NPSKF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NPSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ARBFF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ARBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs JEHLY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MBUMY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and MBUMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MBUMF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and MBUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs GMPUF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs UNIEF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs NTXVF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NTXVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs FAURY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs PASTF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and PASTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NKRKY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NKRKY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -24.51. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NKRKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NKRKF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NKRKF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs TIANF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and TIANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs SFHLF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and SFHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs GUDDY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and GUDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ATNNF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ATNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ABDDF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs GUDHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 692.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and GUDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NMAKF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NMAKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NMAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs FCVFF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs MRETF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while MRETF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs TCISF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs SAEOF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs VTSCY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs PWRHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and PWRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ELLRY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ELLRY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs EGKLF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and EGKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NPSGF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NPSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NPSGY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NPSGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs IOCJY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs XNGIF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs WLMTF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while WLMTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs AKBIF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and AKBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs AMGRF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while AMGRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and AMGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs EXCOF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while EXCOF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs SCTH Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs HWAFF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs KGAUF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and KGAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs FESTF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and FESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs CAOHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs LEAT Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while LEAT trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -187.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs STSGF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NWFAF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs NFGRF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs VOAXF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs CREVF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs CCEGF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and CCEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs CMMCF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and CMMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs ATHHF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while ATHHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and ATHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs UFMG Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs AFFL Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and AFFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs AMTY Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs OPTI Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.
FURCF vs SPKTF Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FURCF vs CDTI Comparison
FURCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FURCF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FURCF is priced at $10.58, while CDTI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FURCF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.53, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FURCF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FURCF is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FURCF.