Bidstack Group Plc
Bidstack Group Plc FTBGF Peers
See (FTBGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTBGF | $0.03 | +20.00% | 29.04M | -2.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| WOLTF | $182.25 | +1.35% | 42.71B | 35.18 | $5.18 | +0.51% |
| WTKWY | $180.00 | +1.31% | 42.19B | 35.93 | $5.01 | +0.56% |
| BMBLF | $14.24 | +1.75% | 19.51B | 23.74 | $0.60 | +2.89% |
| BXBLY | $28.10 | +0.43% | 19.35B | 23.61 | $1.19 | +2.68% |
| DNPCF | $30.50 | -0.39% | 13.78B | 18.26 | $1.67 | +0.85% |
| IKTSY | $67.25 | -0.51% | 10.73B | 23.76 | $2.83 | +2.44% |
| IKTSF | $67.00 | +6.22% | 10.68B | 23.67 | $2.83 | +2.46% |
| RKLIF | $4.05 | -1.94% | 10.18B | 25.31 | $0.16 | +2.91% |
| SDXOF | $66.33 | +7.30% | 9.71B | 13.08 | $5.07 | +16.33% |
Stock Comparison
FTBGF vs WOLTF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 42.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while WOLTF trades at $182.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs WTKWY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 42.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while WTKWY trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs BMBLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 19.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while BMBLF trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and BMBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs BXBLY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 19.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while BXBLY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs DNPCF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 13.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DNPCF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs IKTSY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 10.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IKTSY trades at $67.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and IKTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs IKTSF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IKTSF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs RKLIF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while RKLIF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SDXOF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SDXOF trades at $66.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SDXAY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 9.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SDXAY trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TONPF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TONPF trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TOPPY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TOPPY trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs INPOY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while INPOY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and INPOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs DNPLY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DNPLY trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TLPFY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TLPFY trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TLPFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TLPFF trades at $102.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ELSSF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ELSSF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs INPOF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while INPOF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and INPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs ISFFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ISFFF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs MITFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while MITFF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs MITFY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while MITFY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SCGPY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SCGPY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SECCF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SECCF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ACENY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs RELOF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while RELOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RELOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs APLUF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to APLUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ISSDY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TCLAF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TCLAF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and TCLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs IPHLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IPHLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs TCLCF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while TCLCF trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and TCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs JSVGF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 850.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and JSVGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs STGXF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 837.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while STGXF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and STGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs RKSLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 590.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while RKSLF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs GLCDF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 539.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs GDIFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 509.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while GDIFF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and GDIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs ITEPF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and ITEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs IRMTF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 385.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IRMTF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs HZNOF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 384.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while HZNOF trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs VSSPY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 361.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while VSSPY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs KPGHF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 337.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while KPGHF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 188.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CLNFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 335.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CLNFF trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 102.36. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs DELRF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 327.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and DELRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs DLUEY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 327.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and DLUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs CTAGF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 288.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CTAGF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs KBRLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 270.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while KBRLF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ITEGY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and ITEGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs PCRRF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs AJISF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs PCOA Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FTBGF has daily volatility of 0.00 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.
FTBGF vs CTAGY Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 97.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CTAGY trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs WTLLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 91.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while WTLLF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ASFH Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 81.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ASFH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ASFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs PGWFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 78.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while PGWFF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs DCMDF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 76.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DCMDF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and DCMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs FLNCF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 65.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while FLNCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and FLNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs RDCPF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CERGF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 62.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CERGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and CERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs ESTTF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 42.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CRKT Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 38.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CRKT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SFRX Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 35.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs UWHGF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and UWHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs SRRPF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SRRPF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and SRRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs GNOLF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and GNOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs NSYC Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 19.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while NSYC trades at $440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ELVG Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ELVG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELVG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs GPOX Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 7.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while GPOX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ADMQ Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ADMQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs REPO Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs LMTI Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while LMTI trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CGRW Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs BLIS Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while BLIS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BLIS's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ANMP Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ANMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and ANMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs SAYFF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and SAYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs OODH Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while OODH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs HHGI Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 675406.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HHGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and HHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs JFIL Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 599571.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while JFIL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CLRYF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CLRYF has a market cap of 579915.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CLRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CLRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CLRYF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CLRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs UNDR Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 479404.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and UNDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs AWAW Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 435082.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while AWAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs MTPR Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 407967.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs DTSL Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391291.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs INCC Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 344819.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while INCC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs WLDPF Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 305956.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs OPMG Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219237.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OPMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs IJJP Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 192545.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and IJJP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs XCPL Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 168521.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to XCPL's ROE of +7.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and XCPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs IMJX Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112725.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs ECOX Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 109628.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ECOX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and ECOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs BRYN Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, BRYN has a market cap of 107900.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while BRYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BRYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BRYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to BRYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CTGL Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 104407.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and CTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs NNFC Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97837.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NNFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs DPUI Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 83296.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF and DPUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FTBGF vs UCPC Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56164.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs GFGU Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48460.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs EVSV Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, EVSV has a market cap of 45765.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while EVSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EVSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EVSV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to EVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs BFLD Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43750.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs SGLS Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39548.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SGLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs CBMJ Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 38111.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.
FTBGF vs PIFR Comparison
FTBGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTBGF stands at 29.04M. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 35132.00. Regarding current trading prices, FTBGF is priced at $0.03, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTBGF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FTBGF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTBGF is less volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTBGF.