Future Supply Chain Solutions Limited
Future Supply Chain Solutions Limited (FSC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSC.NS | ₹2.75 | +4.96% | 120.7M | -0.02 | -₹128.20 | N/A |
| JSWINFRA.BO | ₹274.70 | +2.98% | 572.6B | 37.68 | ₹7.29 | +0.29% |
| JSWINFRA.NS | ₹274.60 | +3.45% | 572.4B | 37.72 | ₹7.28 | +0.29% |
| DELHIVERY.BO | ₹447.95 | -1.09% | 335.4B | 222.86 | ₹2.01 | N/A |
| DELHIVERY.NS | ₹447.60 | -1.14% | 335.1B | 222.69 | ₹2.01 | N/A |
| BLUEDART.BO | ₹4,853.50 | -0.44% | 115.2B | 46.53 | ₹104.32 | +0.52% |
| BLUEDART.NS | ₹4,851.50 | -0.43% | 115.1B | 46.53 | ₹104.27 | +0.52% |
| TCI.NS | ₹905.80 | +0.55% | 69.5B | 15.54 | ₹58.28 | +0.99% |
| TCI.BO | ₹905.60 | +0.40% | 69.5B | 15.55 | ₹58.25 | +0.99% |
| TVSSCS.NS | ₹121.57 | +4.99% | 53.6B | 58.45 | ₹2.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSC.NS vs JSWINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JSWINFRA.BO has a market cap of 572.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JSWINFRA.BO trades at ₹274.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JSWINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JSWINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JSWINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JSWINFRA.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs JSWINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JSWINFRA.NS has a market cap of 572.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JSWINFRA.NS trades at ₹274.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JSWINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JSWINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JSWINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JSWINFRA.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs DELHIVERY.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, DELHIVERY.BO has a market cap of 335.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while DELHIVERY.BO trades at ₹447.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DELHIVERY.BO's P/E ratio is 222.86. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to DELHIVERY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to DELHIVERY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check DELHIVERY.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs DELHIVERY.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, DELHIVERY.NS has a market cap of 335.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while DELHIVERY.NS trades at ₹447.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DELHIVERY.NS's P/E ratio is 222.69. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to DELHIVERY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to DELHIVERY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check DELHIVERY.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs BLUEDART.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, BLUEDART.BO has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while BLUEDART.BO trades at ₹4,853.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLUEDART.BO's P/E ratio is 46.53. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to BLUEDART.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to BLUEDART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check BLUEDART.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs BLUEDART.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, BLUEDART.NS has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while BLUEDART.NS trades at ₹4,851.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLUEDART.NS's P/E ratio is 46.53. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to BLUEDART.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to BLUEDART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check BLUEDART.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs TCI.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TCI.NS has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TCI.NS trades at ₹905.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TCI.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TCI.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs TCI.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TCI.BO has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TCI.BO trades at ₹905.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TCI.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TCI.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs TVSSCS.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TVSSCS.NS has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TVSSCS.NS trades at ₹121.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TVSSCS.NS's P/E ratio is 58.45. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TVSSCS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSCS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TVSSCS.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs TVSSCS.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TVSSCS.BO has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TVSSCS.BO trades at ₹121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TVSSCS.BO's P/E ratio is 58.27. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TVSSCS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSCS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TVSSCS.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs MAHLOG.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, MAHLOG.NS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while MAHLOG.NS trades at ₹354.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAHLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 1417.20. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to MAHLOG.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHLOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check MAHLOG.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs MAHLOG.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, MAHLOG.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while MAHLOG.BO trades at ₹353.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAHLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 1414.20. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to MAHLOG.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHLOG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check MAHLOG.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs GATEWAY.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, GATEWAY.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while GATEWAY.NS trades at ₹55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GATEWAY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to GATEWAY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to GATEWAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check GATEWAY.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs GATEWAY.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, GATEWAY.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while GATEWAY.BO trades at ₹55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GATEWAY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to GATEWAY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to GATEWAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check GATEWAY.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs TCIEXP.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TCIEXP.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TCIEXP.BO trades at ₹504.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCIEXP.BO's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TCIEXP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TCIEXP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TCIEXP.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs TCIEXP.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TCIEXP.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TCIEXP.NS trades at ₹504.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCIEXP.NS's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TCIEXP.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TCIEXP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TCIEXP.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs GATI.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, GATI.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while GATI.NS trades at ₹137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GATI.NS's P/E ratio is -74.46. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to GATI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to GATI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check GATI.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs NAVKARCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, NAVKARCORP.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while NAVKARCORP.NS trades at ₹94.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NAVKARCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 47.44. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to NAVKARCORP.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to NAVKARCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check NAVKARCORP.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs NAVKARCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, NAVKARCORP.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while NAVKARCORP.BO trades at ₹94.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NAVKARCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to NAVKARCORP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to NAVKARCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check NAVKARCORP.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ALLCARGO.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ALLCARGO.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ALLCARGO.BO trades at ₹8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALLCARGO.BO's P/E ratio is 215.50. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ALLCARGO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ALLCARGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ALLCARGO.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ALLCARGO.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ALLCARGO.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ALLCARGO.NS trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALLCARGO.NS's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ALLCARGO.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ALLCARGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ALLCARGO.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs WCIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, WCIL.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while WCIL.NS trades at ₹97.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to WCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to WCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check WCIL.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs ACLGATI.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ACLGATI.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ACLGATI.BO trades at ₹66.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACLGATI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.96. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ACLGATI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ACLGATI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ACLGATI.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ACLGATI.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ACLGATI.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ACLGATI.NS trades at ₹66.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACLGATI.NS's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ACLGATI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ACLGATI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ACLGATI.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs SICAL.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, SICAL.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while SICAL.NS trades at ₹129.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SICAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to SICAL.NS's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to SICAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check SICAL.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs RITCO.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, RITCO.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while RITCO.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to RITCO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to RITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check RITCO.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs RITCO.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, RITCO.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while RITCO.NS trades at ₹262.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to RITCO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to RITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check RITCO.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs JITFINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JITFINFRA.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JITFINFRA.BO trades at ₹284.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JITFINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JITFINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JITFINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JITFINFRA.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs JITFINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JITFINFRA.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JITFINFRA.NS trades at ₹284.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JITFINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JITFINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JITFINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JITFINFRA.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs ATL.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ATL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ATL.BO trades at ₹25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ATL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ATL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ATL.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ATL.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ATL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ATL.NS trades at ₹25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ATL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ATL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ATL.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs SNOWMAN.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, SNOWMAN.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while SNOWMAN.NS trades at ₹37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNOWMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 188.75. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to SNOWMAN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to SNOWMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check SNOWMAN.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs SNOWMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, SNOWMAN.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while SNOWMAN.BO trades at ₹37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNOWMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 188.60. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to SNOWMAN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to SNOWMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check SNOWMAN.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs SICALLOG.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, SICALLOG.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while SICALLOG.NS trades at ₹63.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SICALLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to SICALLOG.NS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to SICALLOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check SICALLOG.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs SICALLOG.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, SICALLOG.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while SICALLOG.BO trades at ₹63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SICALLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 334.58. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to SICALLOG.BO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to SICALLOG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check SICALLOG.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs TIGERLOGS.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TIGERLOGS.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TIGERLOGS.NS trades at ₹35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TIGERLOGS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TIGERLOGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TIGERLOGS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TIGERLOGS.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs AVG.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, AVG.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while AVG.NS trades at ₹158.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVG.NS's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to AVG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to AVG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check AVG.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs AVG.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, AVG.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while AVG.BO trades at ₹157.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to AVG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to AVG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check AVG.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ZEAL.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ZEAL.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ZEAL.BO trades at ₹14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZEAL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ZEAL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ZEAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ZEAL.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs MAHESHWARI.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, MAHESHWARI.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while MAHESHWARI.NS trades at ₹55.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAHESHWARI.NS's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to MAHESHWARI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHESHWARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check MAHESHWARI.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs VLEGOV.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, VLEGOV.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while VLEGOV.NS trades at ₹14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VLEGOV.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to VLEGOV.NS's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to VLEGOV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check VLEGOV.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs VLEGOV.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, VLEGOV.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while VLEGOV.BO trades at ₹14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VLEGOV.BO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to VLEGOV.BO's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to VLEGOV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check VLEGOV.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs JETFREIGHT.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JETFREIGHT.BO has a market cap of 963.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JETFREIGHT.BO trades at ₹20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JETFREIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JETFREIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JETFREIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JETFREIGHT.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs JETFREIGHT.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, JETFREIGHT.NS has a market cap of 955.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while JETFREIGHT.NS trades at ₹20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JETFREIGHT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to JETFREIGHT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to JETFREIGHT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check JETFREIGHT.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs TOTAL.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, TOTAL.NS has a market cap of 873.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while TOTAL.NS trades at ₹54.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOTAL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TOTAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to TOTAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check TOTAL.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs ACCURACY.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ACCURACY.NS has a market cap of 859.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ACCURACY.NS trades at ₹5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACCURACY.NS's P/E ratio is 33.59. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ACCURACY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ACCURACY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ACCURACY.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs PATINTLOG.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, PATINTLOG.NS has a market cap of 819.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while PATINTLOG.NS trades at ₹11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PATINTLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to PATINTLOG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to PATINTLOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check PATINTLOG.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs PATINTLOG.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, PATINTLOG.BO has a market cap of 818.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while PATINTLOG.BO trades at ₹11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PATINTLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to PATINTLOG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to PATINTLOG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check PATINTLOG.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs ARSHIYA.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ARSHIYA.NS has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ARSHIYA.NS trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARSHIYA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ARSHIYA.NS's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ARSHIYA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ARSHIYA.NS's competition here
FSC.NS vs ARSHIYA.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, ARSHIYA.BO has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while ARSHIYA.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARSHIYA.BO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ARSHIYA.BO's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to ARSHIYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check ARSHIYA.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs FSC.BO Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, FSC.BO has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while FSC.BO trades at ₹2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FSC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to FSC.BO's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS and FSC.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSC.BO's competition here
FSC.NS vs GDL.NS Comparison May 2026
FSC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSC.NS stands at 120.7M. In comparison, GDL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSC.NS is priced at ₹2.75, while GDL.NS trades at ₹285.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, FSC.NS's ROE is -3.34%, compared to GDL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSC.NS is less volatile compared to GDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSC.NS.Check GDL.NS's competition here