Fairwood Holdings Limited
Fairwood Holdings Limited (FRWDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRWDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRWDF | $1.05 | +0.00% | 136M | 26.25 | $0.04 | +4.28% |
| CMPGY | $35.24 | +0.31% | 60B | 40.93 | $0.86 | +1.76% |
| CMPGF | $35.05 | -0.57% | 59.5B | 40.76 | $0.86 | +1.74% |
| RSTRF | $71.07 | +0.00% | 32.2B | 23.93 | $2.97 | +3.51% |
| HDALF | $1.78 | -7.05% | 9.6B | 14.83 | $0.12 | +6.45% |
| MDNDF | $38.90 | -2.75% | 5.2B | 24.01 | $1.62 | +0.80% |
| JBFCY | $15.85 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 25.98 | $0.61 | +1.38% |
| JBFCF | $3.95 | -1.25% | 4.4B | 26.33 | $0.15 | +1.38% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | +0.00% | 2.5B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| SKLYF | $10.70 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 152.86 | $0.07 | +1.23% |
Stock Comparison
FRWDF vs CMPGY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CMPGY trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 40.93. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check CMPGY's competition here
FRWDF vs CMPGF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CMPGF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check CMPGF's competition here
FRWDF vs RSTRF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RSTRF trades at $71.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to RSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check RSTRF's competition here
FRWDF vs HDALF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while HDALF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and HDALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDALF's competition here
FRWDF vs MDNDF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MDNDF trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MDNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDNDF's competition here
FRWDF vs JBFCY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while JBFCY trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and JBFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JBFCY's competition here
FRWDF vs JBFCF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while JBFCF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check JBFCF's competition here
FRWDF vs ATGSY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSY's competition here
FRWDF vs SKLYF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SKLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SKLYF's competition here
FRWDF vs ALSSF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ALSSF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check ALSSF's competition here
FRWDF vs ATGSF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSF's competition here
FRWDF vs MBPFF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MBPFF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to MBPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check MBPFF's competition here
FRWDF vs SGLOF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SGLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SGLOF's competition here
FRWDF vs SSPPF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SSPPF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is -58.75. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SSPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SSPPF's competition here
FRWDF vs ARHOF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHOF's competition here
FRWDF vs HELFY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while HELFY trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check HELFY's competition here
FRWDF vs HLFFF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while HLFFF trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and HLFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFFF's competition here
FRWDF vs LKNCY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while LKNCY trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check LKNCY's competition here
FRWDF vs DMPZF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while DMPZF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMPZF's competition here
FRWDF vs DPUKY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while DPUKY trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check DPUKY's competition here
FRWDF vs ELORY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELORY's competition here
FRWDF vs DMZPY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while DMZPY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 121.30. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and DMZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMZPY's competition here
FRWDF vs JDWPY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while JDWPY trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to JDWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check JDWPY's competition here
FRWDF vs DPZUF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while DPZUF trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 124.44. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to DPZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check DPZUF's competition here
FRWDF vs JDWPF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while JDWPF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to JDWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check JDWPF's competition here
FRWDF vs CLLFF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 707.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CLLFF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check CLLFF's competition here
FRWDF vs RSTGF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTGF's competition here
FRWDF vs MTYFF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 636.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MTYFF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check MTYFF's competition here
FRWDF vs ELROF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ELROF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to ELROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check ELROF's competition here
FRWDF vs CFCGF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check CFCGF's competition here
FRWDF vs MLYSF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MLYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYSF's competition here
FRWDF vs FBGI Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while FBGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and FBGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBGI's competition here
FRWDF vs MARZF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MARZF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MARZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MARZF's competition here
FRWDF vs FMBRY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while FMBRY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to FMBRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check FMBRY's competition here
FRWDF vs PZRIF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while PZRIF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to PZRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check PZRIF's competition here
FRWDF vs MRTPY Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MRTPY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to MRTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check MRTPY's competition here
FRWDF vs RTBRF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RTBRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to RTBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check RTBRF's competition here
FRWDF vs CRNGF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNGF's competition here
FRWDF vs DLII Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check DLII's competition here
FRWDF vs XIAXF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while XIAXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to XIAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check XIAXF's competition here
FRWDF vs RFGPF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check RFGPF's competition here
FRWDF vs MHGU Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MHGU trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is -144.33. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MHGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGU's competition here
FRWDF vs MHGUP Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MHGUP trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGUP's competition here
FRWDF vs FRHHF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRHHF's competition here
FRWDF vs TNGPF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check TNGPF's competition here
FRWDF vs GLLDF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLDF's competition here
FRWDF vs FCCI Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while FCCI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCCI's competition here
FRWDF vs SCUPF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SCUPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SCUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SCUPF's competition here
FRWDF vs MORRF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MORRF's competition here
FRWDF vs ODDAF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ODDAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to ODDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check ODDAF's competition here
FRWDF vs JKHCF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check JKHCF's competition here
FRWDF vs NROM Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while NROM trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and NROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NROM's competition here
FRWDF vs GGLT Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GGLT trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GGLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGLT's competition here
FRWDF vs SCFFF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SCFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SCFFF's competition here
FRWDF vs ZAAG Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ZAAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAAG's competition here
FRWDF vs GAMN Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 800.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GAMN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to GAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check GAMN's competition here
FRWDF vs BDVB Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 753.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while BDVB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and BDVB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDVB's competition here
FRWDF vs KITL Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 489.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check KITL's competition here
FRWDF vs WHCA Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 401.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while WHCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check WHCA's competition here
FRWDF vs BLUU Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to BLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check BLUU's competition here
FRWDF vs GMPR Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GMPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GMPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMPR's competition here
FRWDF vs COFE Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while COFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to COFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check COFE's competition here
FRWDF vs GASMF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASMF's competition here
FRWDF vs BBUCQ Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUCQ's competition here
FRWDF vs GTEH Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GTEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTEH's competition here
FRWDF vs SWRL Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to SWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check SWRL's competition here
FRWDF vs RIBS Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and RIBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIBS's competition here
FRWDF vs PFSF Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while PFSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to PFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check PFSF's competition here
FRWDF vs CORG Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRWDF.Check CORG's competition here
FRWDF vs AMHG Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and AMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMHG's competition here
FRWDF vs GCFB Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCFB's competition here
FRWDF vs HTRE Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTRE's competition here
FRWDF vs ULFS Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULFS's competition here
FRWDF vs RKLC Comparison August 2025
FRWDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRWDF stands at 136M. In comparison, RKLC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRWDF is priced at $1.05, while RKLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.25, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRWDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRWDF and RKLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKLC's competition here