The Fresh Factory B.C. Ltd.
The Fresh Factory B.C. Ltd. FRSH.CN Peers
See (FRSH.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH.CN | CA$0.85 | -5.56% | 44.4M | -6.54 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
| SAP.TO | CA$26.89 | +0.49% | 11.2B | -65.59 | -CA$0.41 | +2.82% |
| PBH.TO | CA$78.95 | -0.77% | 3.5B | 29.91 | CA$2.64 | +4.30% |
| MFI.TO | CA$28.28 | +0.75% | 3.5B | 37.21 | CA$0.76 | +3.57% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$35.53 | -2.82% | 1.5B | 29.12 | CA$1.22 | +2.56% |
| SOY.TO | CA$8.25 | +3.51% | 969.7M | -68.75 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| HLF.TO | CA$18.21 | -1.19% | 529.8M | 7.00 | CA$2.60 | +2.89% |
| BOIL.CN | CA$3.17 | +0.63% | 222.9M | -8.81 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.15 | -1.71% | 148.9M | -57.50 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.50 | +1.01% | 43.7M | -16.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRSH.CN vs SAP.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while SAP.TO trades at CA$26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -65.59. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs PBH.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while PBH.TO trades at CA$78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs MFI.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while MFI.TO trades at CA$28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs JWEL.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs SOY.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 969.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while SOY.TO trades at CA$8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -68.75. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs HLF.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, HLF.TO has a market cap of 529.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while HLF.TO trades at CA$18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas HLF.TO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to HLF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to HLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs BOIL.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while BOIL.CN trades at CA$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs HBFG.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs GFCO.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and GFCO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs BU.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while BU.TO trades at CA$3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs SWP.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while SWP.TO trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and SWP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs ELMT.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs NPRA.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs PSYC.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs BABY.TO Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and BABY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs PNGA.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and PNGA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs LLP.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while LLP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and LLP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs EMRG.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and EMRG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs CULT.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN is less volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.CN.
FRSH.CN vs MOOO.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and MOOO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs BITE.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and BITE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs PLBL.NE Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and PLBL.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs MEAT.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 740.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and MEAT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs VEGI.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and VEGI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs FIT.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and FIT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs VAGN.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and VAGN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs YUM.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and YUM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs ARTO.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and ARTO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs VEJI.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRSH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
FRSH.CN vs MEAL.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and MEAL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs FUEL.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH.CN and FUEL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRSH.CN vs RSF.CN Comparison
FRSH.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, RSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH.CN is priced at CA$0.85, while RSF.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.54, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH.CN's ROE is -0.64%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRSH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.