First Republic Bank

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 188.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HDB trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 69.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while ITUB trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 68.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while MFG trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 67.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while PNC trades at $171.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PH trades at $20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PS trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 66.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB trades at $42.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 66.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PA trades at $845.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 240.74. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 66.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PP trades at $22.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while LYG trades at $4.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 61.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while IBN trades at $34.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 52.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while DB trades at $27.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 51.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while TFC trades at $39.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -206.82. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BSBR trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HBANL trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 31.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HBANM trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 30.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while TFC-PI trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 28.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while MTB trades at $179.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BBD trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BBDO trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while TFC-PO trades at $20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 26.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KB trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HBANP trades at $17.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PR trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 24.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FITB trades at $37.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while TFC-PR trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FCNCP trades at $21.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FCNCO trades at $22.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FCNCA trades at $1,822.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while USB-PQ trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while RF-PF trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 22.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HBAN trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 19.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while SHG trades at $39.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while RF-PC trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 19.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while RF trades at $21.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KEY-PL trades at $24.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KEY-PK trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 17.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CFG trades at $39.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 17.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KEY trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -82.29. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KEY-PI trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FITBI trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BAP trades at $204.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FITBP trades at $24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BCH trades at $31.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while RF-PE trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FITBO trades at $21.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN-PB trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN-PC trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CFG-PH trades at $26.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN-PE trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CIB trades at $41.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while GGAL trades at $62.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN trades at $19.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while WF trades at $39.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while SSB trades at $87.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while WBS trades at $51.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CBSH trades at $62.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while PNFP trades at $105.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CFG-PE trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CFR trades at $126.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while WTFCM trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while WTFC trades at $118.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 7.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while WAL trades at $71.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 7.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while UMBF trades at $101.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while ONBPO trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while ONB trades at $20.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while ONBPP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CMA trades at $56.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BPOP trades at $102.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while ZION trades at $46.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while PB trades at $69.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while SNV-PD trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while SNV trades at $47.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BMA trades at $94.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BOKF trades at $92.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HOMB trades at $28.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while CADE trades at $30.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while UBSI trades at $36.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while OZK trades at $44.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FNB trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while COLB trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FLG trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while FFIN trades at $34.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while VLYPP trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while VLY trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while VLYPO trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HWCPZ trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while HWC trades at $54.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while GBCI trades at $40.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while BBAR trades at $21.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while NYCB trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.

FRC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRC stands at 653.63M. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FRC is priced at $3.51, while IFS trades at $36.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.43, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRC is more volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRC.