Salesforce, Inc.
Salesforce, Inc. FOO.F Peers
See (FOO.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOO.F | €233.50 | +0.00% | 221.2B | 41.77 | €5.54 | +0.63% |
| SAP.DE | €258.15 | +0.00% | 298.2B | 52.48 | €4.87 | +0.79% |
| FOO.DE | €232.20 | +0.00% | 221.7B | 41.72 | €5.56 | +0.63% |
| ITU.DE | €669.40 | +0.00% | 183.2B | 62.19 | €10.56 | +0.58% |
| 307.F | €97.27 | -1.37% | 125.7B | 90.47 | €1.06 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | €287.35 | +0.26% | 61.9B | 109.26 | €2.63 | N/A |
| CDS.DE | €165.64 | +0.00% | 45.4B | 61.12 | €2.71 | N/A |
| 5ZM.F | €67.37 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 23.10 | €2.85 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
| NEM.DE | €123.00 | +0.00% | 14B | 78.70 | €1.54 | +0.40% |
Stock Comparison
FOO.F vs SAP.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while SAP.DE trades at €258.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs FOO.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 221.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while FOO.DE trades at €232.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs ITU.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while ITU.DE trades at €669.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 62.19. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 307.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 307.F has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 307.F trades at €97.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 307.F's P/E ratio is 90.47. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 307.F's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to 307.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs AUD.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while AUD.DE trades at €287.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 109.26. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs CDS.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while CDS.DE trades at €165.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 5ZM.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 5ZM.F has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 5ZM.F trades at €67.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 5ZM.F's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5ZM.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 5ZM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs FFV.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs NEM.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while NEM.DE trades at €123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 78.70. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs CTX.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs E3G1.SG Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while E3G1.SG trades at €66.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while US44891N2080.SG trades at €31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs AOF.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while AOF.DE trades at €141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 49.51. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TMV.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TMV.DE trades at €9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs RKET.HM Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while RKET.HM trades at €17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs MUM.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 895.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while MUM.DE trades at €53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs M8G.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs M8G.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while M8G.F trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs GKS.HM Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 0S6.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 617.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs GKS.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs PSAN.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 464.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while PSAN.DE trades at €30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs IVU.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while IVU.DE trades at €19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs DBD.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TPG.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TPG.DE trades at €9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs SJJ.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 176.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while SJJ.DE trades at €17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is -1680.00. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs FAA.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while FAA.DE trades at €15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs MSGL.HM Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 52D0.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 52D0.F has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 52D0.F trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 52D0.F's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 52D0.F's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 52D0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs BSS.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while BSS.F trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs V3S.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs ESY.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs CSH.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while CSH.DE trades at €8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 27H.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 27H.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TR9.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TR9.F trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TR9.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -24.72. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs ISHA.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -174.00. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs US37892C1062.SG Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, US37892C1062.SG has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while US37892C1062.SG trades at €1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas US37892C1062.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to US37892C1062.SG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to US37892C1062.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs NIIN.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 1OJ.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 1OJ.F trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TBX.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TBX.F trades at €8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs VRL.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while VRL.DE trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs BWQ.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs TBX0.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while TBX0.F trades at €7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs IVX.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs DTD2.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 2LH.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 2LH.F trades at €3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs ABX.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while ABX.DE trades at €2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 8DQ.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 8DQ.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs CPU2.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while CPU2.F trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 537.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 9J4.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 9J4.F trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs SC2.DE Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.
FOO.F vs 1HD.F Comparison
FOO.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOO.F stands at 221.2B. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOO.F is priced at €233.50, while 1HD.F trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOO.F currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, FOO.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOO.F is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOO.F.