Fresnillo plc
Fresnillo plc (FNLPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNLPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNLPF | $23.07 | -1.79% | 16.8B | 36.85 | $0.62 | +3.88% |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.2B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| ANGPY | $8.07 | +0.00% | 12.5B | 158.20 | $0.05 | +8.13% |
| IMPUF | $9.65 | +0.00% | 8.6B | -9.01 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $9.46 | +0.00% | 8.5B | -8.83 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.00 | +0.00% | 5.5B | -34.13 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $9.56 | -0.73% | 4B | 23.09 | $0.44 | +0.79% |
| GMINF | $12.71 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 24.19 | $0.52 | N/A |
| POYYF | $3.09 | +14.44% | 1.5B | -5.07 | -$0.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FNLPF vs AUXIF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUXIF's competition here
FNLPF vs ANGPY Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ANGPY trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 158.20. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ANGPY's competition here
FNLPF vs IMPUF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while IMPUF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IMPUF's competition here
FNLPF vs IMPUY Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while IMPUY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IMPUY's competition here
FNLPF vs OICT Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while OICT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.13. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OICT's competition here
FNLPF vs NMPNF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check NMPNF's competition here
FNLPF vs JINFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while JINFF trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check JINFF's competition here
FNLPF vs GMINF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GMINF trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GMINF's competition here
FNLPF vs POYYF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check POYYF's competition here
FNLPF vs ZMPLF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ZMPLF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
FNLPF vs AUCOY Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUCOY's competition here
FNLPF vs ABBRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 603.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ABBRF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -41.91. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ABBRF's competition here
FNLPF vs GLGDF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GLGDF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GLGDF's competition here
FNLPF vs TPRFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TPRFF's competition here
FNLPF vs SAPLF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SAPLF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SAPLF's competition here
FNLPF vs GOTRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GOTRF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GOTRF's competition here
FNLPF vs TIHRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TIHRF's competition here
FNLPF vs BRVMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BRVMF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -73.47. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BRVMF's competition here
FNLPF vs PLLHF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PLLHF's competition here
FNLPF vs SLVTF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 176.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SLVTF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -42.94. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SLVTF's competition here
FNLPF vs IAUFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while IAUFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IAUFF's competition here
FNLPF vs PDIV Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PDIV trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PDIV's competition here
FNLPF vs BKRRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BKRRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BKRRF's competition here
FNLPF vs BOCOF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BOCOF's competition here
FNLPF vs XANAF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check XANAF's competition here
FNLPF vs SDRC Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SDRC trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -360.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SDRC's competition here
FNLPF vs PAASF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PAASF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PAASF's competition here
FNLPF vs CTNXF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CTNXF's competition here
FNLPF vs HEGLF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while HEGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HEGLF's competition here
FNLPF vs BRGC Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BRGC trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BRGC's competition here
FNLPF vs CHPGF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while CHPGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -42.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CHPGF's competition here
FNLPF vs EMPYF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while EMPYF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 64.84. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EMPYF's competition here
FNLPF vs SMDRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SMDRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -27.55. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SMDRF's competition here
FNLPF vs INMNF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check INMNF's competition here
FNLPF vs OCGSF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while OCGSF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OCGSF's competition here
FNLPF vs LUCRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while LUCRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LUCRF's competition here
FNLPF vs CAPTF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while CAPTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -32.03. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CAPTF's competition here
FNLPF vs VLMGF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while VLMGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -59.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VLMGF's competition here
FNLPF vs PDLMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PDLMF's competition here
FNLPF vs ARRKF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ARRKF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ARRKF's competition here
FNLPF vs SSVFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SSVFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SSVFF's competition here
FNLPF vs DNCVF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while DNCVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DNCVF's competition here
FNLPF vs ORVMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ORVMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ORVMF's competition here
FNLPF vs SNNGF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SNNGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +7.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SNNGF's competition here
FNLPF vs ACKRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ACKRF's competition here
FNLPF vs ADYRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ADYRF's competition here
FNLPF vs SCTSF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SCTSF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SCTSF's competition here
FNLPF vs TEUTF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TEUTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TEUTF's competition here
FNLPF vs TBXXF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TBXXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TBXXF's competition here
FNLPF vs DYNR Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while DYNR trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DYNR's competition here
FNLPF vs SSVRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -31.19. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SSVRF's competition here
FNLPF vs KDKCF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while KDKCF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check KDKCF's competition here
FNLPF vs BBBXF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BBBXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BBBXF's competition here
FNLPF vs WAMFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while WAMFF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check WAMFF's competition here
FNLPF vs TSORF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TSORF's competition here
FNLPF vs HMRRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HMRRF's competition here
FNLPF vs FCSUF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check FCSUF's competition here
FNLPF vs OKPRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OKPRF's competition here
FNLPF vs VTXXF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VTXXF's competition here
FNLPF vs AGMRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AGMRF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AGMRF's competition here
FNLPF vs KGFMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while KGFMF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -17.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check KGFMF's competition here
FNLPF vs TLSMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TLSMF's competition here
FNLPF vs EMPPF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while EMPPF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EMPPF's competition here
FNLPF vs SMOFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SMOFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SMOFF's competition here
FNLPF vs ATEPF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ATEPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -28.77. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ATEPF's competition here
FNLPF vs ACRG Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ACRG's competition here
FNLPF vs AGLDF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AGLDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AGLDF's competition here
FNLPF vs MMNGF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while MMNGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MMNGF's competition here
FNLPF vs EQMEF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while EQMEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EQMEF's competition here
FNLPF vs ELRFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ELRFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ELRFF's competition here
FNLPF vs SHGDF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SHGDF's competition here
FNLPF vs DNRSF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while DNRSF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DNRSF's competition here
FNLPF vs GLDRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GLDRF's competition here
FNLPF vs VIPRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while VIPRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VIPRF's competition here
FNLPF vs WEXPF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while WEXPF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check WEXPF's competition here
FNLPF vs THMG Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while THMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check THMG's competition here
FNLPF vs CTMCF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while CTMCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CTMCF's competition here
FNLPF vs MRZLF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while MRZLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MRZLF's competition here
FNLPF vs RITE Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while RITE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check RITE's competition here
FNLPF vs LGCXF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while LGCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LGCXF's competition here
FNLPF vs NAUFF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while NAUFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check NAUFF's competition here
FNLPF vs GBRRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GBRRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GBRRF's competition here
FNLPF vs URVNF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check URVNF's competition here
FNLPF vs BYRG Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BYRG's competition here
FNLPF vs MERG Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MERG's competition here
FNLPF vs AUCUF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUCUF's competition here
FNLPF vs PGLDF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PGLDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PGLDF's competition here
FNLPF vs GMDMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while GMDMF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GMDMF's competition here
FNLPF vs ESGLF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ESGLF's competition here
FNLPF vs PNTRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PNTRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PNTRF's competition here
FNLPF vs VOYRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VOYRF's competition here
FNLPF vs CJIMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CJIMF's competition here
FNLPF vs PVGDF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while PVGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PVGDF's competition here
FNLPF vs AUSVF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUSVF's competition here
FNLPF vs SEKZF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SEKZF's competition here
FNLPF vs HBEIF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while HBEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -63.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HBEIF's competition here
FNLPF vs SBMCF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while SBMCF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SBMCF's competition here
FNLPF vs LBCMF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while LBCMF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LBCMF's competition here
FNLPF vs ASLRF Comparison August 2025
FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $23.07, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ASLRF's competition here