Fresnillo plc

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ANGPY trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 339.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ANGPY's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while IMPUY trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 394.40. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IMPUY's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while IMPUF trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IMPUF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while MMSMY trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 41.12. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MMSMY's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while JINFF trades at $26.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check JINFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while GMINF trades at $38.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GMINF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check XZJCF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while OICT trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OICT's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check NMPNF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ABBRF trades at $12.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -113.18. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ABBRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ZMPLF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check POYYF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 956.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while GLGDF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GLGDF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUCOY's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TIHRF trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TIHRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check FCSUF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while BKRRF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -23.26. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BKRRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SAPLF trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SAPLF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while BRVMF trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -105.33. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BRVMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SLVTF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -68.43. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SLVTF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check IAUFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TPRFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while GOTRF trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GOTRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while HGLD trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HGLD's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SMDRF trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -154.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SMDRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PAASF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PAASF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CHPGF trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -78.80. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CHPGF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SSVFF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SSVFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ORVMF trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ORVMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CAPTF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -167.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CAPTF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TBXXF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TBXXF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BOCOF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SNNGF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PLLHF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while XANAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check XANAF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while AGLDF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AGLDF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while NAUFF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.22. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check NAUFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while OCGSF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OCGSF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while EMPYF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EMPYF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SCTSF trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SCTSF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SDRC trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -288.10. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SDRC's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CTNXF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PGLDF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PGLDF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TSORF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TSORF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TEUTF trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TEUTF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while LUCRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LUCRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while LGCXF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LGCXF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while AGMRF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AGMRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while AMNP trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AMNP's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while DNCVF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DNCVF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while VIPRF trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VIPRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ELRFF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ELRFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while THMG trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check THMG's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while KDKCF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -77.40. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check KDKCF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while LBCMF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check LBCMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ACRG trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ACRG's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HEGLF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ARRKF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ARRKF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while BBBXF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BBBXF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while EQMEF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EQMEF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MMNGF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while VLMGF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -54.58. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VLMGF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CPPMF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CPPMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while EMPPF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check EMPPF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while BRGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check BRGC's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SMOFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ACKRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while DNRSF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DNRSF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PDLMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check VTXXF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ATEPF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CTMCF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while KGFMF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -50.24. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check KGFMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ADYRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while DYNR trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check DYNR's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check RKHNF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PNTRF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PNTRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PVGDF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PVGDF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SSVRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HMRRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check MRZLF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check CJIMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while RITE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check RITE's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while WEXPF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check WEXPF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check OKPRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while WAMFF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check WAMFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check TLSMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SUNPF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SUNPF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ZLME trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FNLPF has daily volatility of 4.58 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ESGLF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ESGLF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check GLDRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check ASLRF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SBMCF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while STRFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check STRFF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check SHGDF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -19.01. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check AUCUF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check URVNF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while PLLMF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check PLLMF's competition here

FNLPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNLPF stands at 39.8B. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNLPF is priced at $54.35, while HBEIF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNLPF currently has a P/E ratio of 87.02, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, FNLPF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FNLPF is more volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNLPF.Check HBEIF's competition here