Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, BUD has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while BUD trades at $70.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas BUD's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BUD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to BUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check BUD's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ABEV has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while ABEV trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas ABEV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABEV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to ABEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check ABEV's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TAP-A has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while TAP-A trades at $48.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas TAP-A's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TAP-A's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to TAP-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check TAP-A's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TAP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while TAP trades at $42.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas TAP's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TAP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to TAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check TAP's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SAM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while SAM trades at $234.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas SAM's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SAM's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CCU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while CCU trades at $11.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas CCU's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to CCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check CCU's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CASK has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while CASK trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas CASK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CASK's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to CASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check CASK's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, YHC has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while YHC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas YHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YHC's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to YHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check YHC's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, IPST has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while IPST trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas IPST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPST's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to IPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check IPST's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SBEV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while SBEV trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas SBEV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBEV's ROE of +5.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SBEV's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SBEV-WT has a market cap of 41.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while SBEV-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas SBEV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBEV-WT's ROE of +5.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SBEV-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SBEV-WT's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $113.10, while LQ trades at $43.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 39.81, whereas LQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LQ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to LQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check LQ's competition here