Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.
Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. FLXT Peers
See (FLXT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLXT | $0.00 | -16.00% | 263.7K | -0.03 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $404.68 | -2.37% | 98.1B | 35.13 | $11.52 | +0.55% |
| HNHPF | $10.26 | -0.91% | 71.2B | 12.51 | $0.82 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.36 | -15.99% | 28.6B | 17.65 | $0.87 | +2.52% |
| HXGBY | $10.07 | -0.66% | 27.3B | 24.57 | $0.41 | +1.53% |
| MRAAY | $7.13 | -0.97% | 26.6B | 16.58 | $0.43 | +0.73% |
| HXGBF | $10.16 | -5.04% | 26.2B | 24.78 | $0.41 | +1.56% |
| TTDKF | $11.00 | +0.46% | 20.9B | 18.04 | $0.61 | +2.12% |
| TTDKY | $10.47 | -2.33% | 19.9B | 16.89 | $0.62 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
FLXT vs KYCCF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $404.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HNHPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HNHAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and HNHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs MRAAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HXGBY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs MRAAY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HXGBF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and HXGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs TTDKF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs TTDKY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs VEMLY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and VEMLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs BYDIY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SOTGY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SNPTF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs BYDIF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and BYDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs SHMZF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs MNBEY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and MNBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs MNBEF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs IBIDF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and IBIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs OMRNY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 44.53. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs AUOTY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HRSEF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HPHTF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HPHTY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs VEMLF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and VEMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs SEPJF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HRIBF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SEPJY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs TOPCF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs RNSHF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs TYOYY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $68.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 152.80. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and TYOYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs APELF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and APELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs FITGF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and FITGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs APELY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs CODAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs KGBLY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs AMANF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs NPEGF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs VAIAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs JELLF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs NILRF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and NILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs JNPKF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs JPAVF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs BCNAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs CAZGF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -143.42. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and CAZGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs AITUF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs AUDGF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and AUDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs ASAAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs BCNAY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and BCNAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs VARXF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs JNNDF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs KRKNF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HNMUF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs JPDYY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and JPDYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs KACPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HROEY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and HROEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs TRUHF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs NNFTF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and NNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs TTGPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs FUBAF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and FUBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs SMOPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and SMOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs NPTSF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs CHAEF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs HUDLF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and HUDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs ENMPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs IACYF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ENMPY Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs IKGPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and IKGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs SDIIF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs MPAD Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SILLF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs BMNR Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BMNR trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ACFN Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs AATC Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs YNVYF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and YNVYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs IEHC Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ERMG Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and ERMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs NSCIF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs INRD Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs WELX Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs KESPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and KESPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs FGRRF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ROBOF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs AAIRF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs BNSOF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SCND Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs LCTC Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs GNCLF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ZTSTF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs SIGL Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs ESHSF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs DPLS Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs TNLX Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs VPER Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs RMTD Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs TRCK Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs MRRYF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs UCLE Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while UCLE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT and UCLE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLXT vs NXOPF Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.
FLXT vs VPIM Comparison
FLXT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXT stands at 263.7K. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXT is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXT's ROE is -17.28%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXT is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXT.