Franklin Risk Managed Canadian Equity Active ETF
Franklin Risk Managed Canadian Equity Active ETF (FLRM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLRM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLRM.TO | CA$22.59 | +0.44% | 4.7M | 12.14 | CA$1.86 | +3.41% |
| BLK.NE | CA$24.89 | +4.06% | 197.6B | 23.80 | CA$1.04 | +2.31% |
| BN.TO | CA$56.75 | +5.15% | 126.5B | 82.90 | CA$0.68 | +0.61% |
| BAM.TO | CA$61.39 | +2.15% | 101.3B | 29.04 | CA$2.13 | +4.05% |
| VFV.TO | CA$162.06 | +3.44% | 29.1B | 26.33 | CA$6.11 | +0.97% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$50.30 | +5.74% | 23.7B | 3.88 | CA$12.73 | N/A |
| XIC.TO | CA$52.58 | +3.22% | 22.8B | 19.40 | CA$2.69 | +2.16% |
| PSLV.TO | CA$34.08 | +7.78% | 21.7B | 4.72 | CA$7.21 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$48.39 | +2.79% | 20.8B | 19.45 | CA$2.48 | +2.35% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$100.06 | +3.44% | 20.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
FLRM.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 197.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while BLK.NE trades at CA$24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
FLRM.TO vs BN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while BN.TO trades at CA$56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 82.90. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while BAM.TO trades at CA$61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VFV.TO trades at CA$162.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XIC.TO trades at CA$52.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XIU.TO trades at CA$48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$100.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XEF.TO trades at CA$48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VUN.TO trades at CA$122.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while IGM.TO trades at CA$67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VCN.TO trades at CA$66.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XSP.TO trades at CA$66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CEF.TO trades at CA$67.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XUS.TO trades at CA$56.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XBB.TO trades at CA$27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VIU.TO trades at CA$45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FBAL.NE Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FBAL.NE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FBAL.NE trades at CA$14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FBAL.NE's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBAL.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FBAL.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FBAL.NE's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$103.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CASH.TO trades at CA$49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CASH.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VDY.TO trades at CA$66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs PMEI-UN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PMEI-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while PMEI-UN.TO trades at CA$8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PMEI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMEI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to PMEI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check PMEI-UN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$58.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HXS.TO trades at CA$94.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while TTP.TO trades at CA$37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VSP.TO trades at CA$103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while QUU.TO trades at CA$263.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs SII.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while SII.TO trades at CA$205.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 54.99. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZMMK.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HXT.TO trades at CA$86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while TPU.TO trades at CA$51.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while TPE.TO trades at CA$28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$88.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FGRO.NE Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FGRO.NE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FGRO.NE trades at CA$17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FGRO.NE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGRO.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FGRO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FGRO.NE's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XUU.TO trades at CA$66.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VEE.TO trades at CA$45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XAW.TO trades at CA$51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XEC.TO trades at CA$38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XEI.TO trades at CA$36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VCE.TO trades at CA$70.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VXC.TO trades at CA$73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XCB.TO trades at CA$19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XFH.TO trades at CA$39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$163.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while QCN.TO trades at CA$201.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CMR.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HISA.NE Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HISA.NE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HISA.NE trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HISA.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HISA.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to HISA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HISA.NE's competition here
FLRM.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while VGG.TO trades at CA$102.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XDV.TO trades at CA$41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$55.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HXCN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CACB.TO trades at CA$19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XFN.TO trades at CA$76.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CYB.TO trades at CA$89.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XIN.TO trades at CA$43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FCNS.NE Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCNS.NE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FCNS.NE trades at CA$12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FCNS.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNS.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FCNS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FCNS.NE's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XEG.TO trades at CA$26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check CBIL.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZNQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZNQ.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZNQ.TO trades at CA$107.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZNQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZNQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZNQ.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs GCG-A.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GCG-A.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while GCG-A.TO trades at CA$67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas GCG-A.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCG-A.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to GCG-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check GCG-A.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZDM.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check ZDV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FCIV.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCIV.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FCIV.TO trades at CA$51.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FCIV.TO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FCIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FCIV.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while EQL.TO trades at CA$40.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here
FLRM.TO vs FCIQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FLRM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRM.TO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCIQ.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRM.TO is priced at CA$22.59, while FCIQ.TO trades at CA$45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas FCIQ.TO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, FLRM.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCIQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRM.TO is less volatile compared to FCIQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRM.TO.Check FCIQ.TO's competition here