Ultra Brands Ltd. Fundamental Analysis
Ultra Brands Ltd. (FLLLF) shows moderate financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -0.27, profit margin of 0.00%, and ROE of 22.73%. The company generates N/A in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.
Key Strengths
Areas of Concern
The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of 58.3/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The C grade reflects average fundamentals, with notable risks in certain areas.
Fundamental Health Score
We analyze FLLLF's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:
Efficiency Score
WeakFLLLF struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.
Valuation Score
ExcellentFLLLF trades at attractive valuation levels.
Growth Score
WeakFLLLF faces weak or negative growth trends.
Financial Health Score
ModerateFLLLF shows balanced financial health with some risks.
Profitability Score
WeakFLLLF struggles to sustain strong margins.
Key Financial Metrics
Is FLLLF Expensive or Cheap?
P/E Ratio
FLLLF trades at -0.27 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.
PEG Ratio
When adjusting for growth, FLLLF's PEG of 0.01 indicates potential undervaluation.
Price to Book
The market values Ultra Brands Ltd. at -0.06 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value stands at 4.17 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.
How Well Does FLLLF Make Money?
Net Profit Margin
For every $100 in sales, Ultra Brands Ltd. keeps $0.00 as profit after all expenses.
Operating Margin
Core operations generate 0.00 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.
ROE
Management delivers $22.73 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.
ROA
Ultra Brands Ltd. generates $-2.44 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.
Following the Money - Real Cash Generation
FCF Per Share
Each share generates $-0.01 in free cash annually.
FCF Yield
FLLLF converts -1.82% of its market value into free cash.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Valuation Ratios
P/E Ratio
Price to earnings ratio
-0.27
vs 25 benchmark
PEG Ratio
Price/earnings to growth ratio
0.01
vs 25 benchmark
P/B Ratio
Price to book value ratio
-0.06
vs 25 benchmark
P/S Ratio
Price to sales ratio
0.00
vs 25 benchmark
Financial Health
Debt/Equity
Total debt to shareholders' equity
-0.63
vs 25 benchmark
Current Ratio
Current assets to current liabilities
0.07
vs 25 benchmark
Efficiency Ratios
ROE
Return on equity percentage
0.23
vs 25 benchmark
ROA
Return on assets percentage
-2.44
vs 25 benchmark
ROCE
Return on capital employed
0.14
vs 25 benchmark
How FLLLF Stacks Against Its Sector Peers
| Metric | FLLLF Value | Sector Average | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -0.27 | 21.60 | Better (Cheaper) |
| ROE | 22.73% | 1146.00% | Weak |
| Net Margin | 0.00% | -3289.00% (disorted) | Weak |
| Debt/Equity | -0.63 | 0.81 | Strong (Low Leverage) |
| Current Ratio | 0.07 | 2.40 | Weak Liquidity |
| ROA | -244.12% | -581579.00% (disorted) | Weak |
FLLLF outperforms its industry in 2 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.
Historical Growth Performance
5-Year Growth Trajectory
This section reviews Ultra Brands Ltd.'s 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.
Revenue CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Defensive, Dividend, Low Volatility
EPS CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Defensive, Dividend, Low Volatility
FCF CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Defensive, Dividend, Low Volatility