FOLLI FOLLIE Commercial Manufacturing And Technical SA
FOLLI FOLLIE Commercial Manufacturing And Technical SA (FLLIY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLLIY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLIY | $2.10 | -65.57% | 139.3M | -0.54 | -$3.90 | N/A |
| LVMUY | $125.35 | -0.01% | 325.5B | 25.31 | $5.18 | +1.60% |
| LVMHF | $633.33 | +2.32% | 325.3B | 25.25 | $25.95 | +2.27% |
| HESAY | $240.61 | +0.00% | 261.6B | 48.73 | $5.12 | +1.17% |
| HESAF | $2,365.00 | -1.10% | 256.9B | 47.93 | $51.12 | +1.23% |
| CFRUY | $20.66 | +0.01% | 123.4B | 27.27 | $0.77 | +0.84% |
| CHDRY | $154.88 | +0.00% | 111.7B | 20.88 | $7.41 | +2.20% |
| CFRHF | $200.70 | +0.00% | 108.7B | 26.40 | $7.71 | +1.81% |
| CHDRF | $590.00 | +0.00% | 106.4B | 19.91 | $29.63 | +2.68% |
| PPRUY | $32.71 | +0.00% | 40.2B | -1094.00 | -$0.03 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
FLLIY vs LVMUY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while LVMUY trades at $125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check LVMUY's competition here
FLLIY vs LVMHF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 325.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while LVMHF trades at $633.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check LVMHF's competition here
FLLIY vs HESAY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 261.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while HESAY trades at $240.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check HESAY's competition here
FLLIY vs HESAF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 256.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while HESAF trades at $2,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check HESAF's competition here
FLLIY vs CFRUY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CFRUY trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CFRUY's competition here
FLLIY vs CHDRY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CHDRY trades at $154.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CHDRY's competition here
FLLIY vs CFRHF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CFRHF trades at $200.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CFRHF's competition here
FLLIY vs CHDRF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CHDRF trades at $590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CHDRF's competition here
FLLIY vs PPRUY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PPRUY trades at $32.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is -1094.00. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PPRUY's competition here
FLLIY vs PPRUF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PPRUF trades at $330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is -1172.74. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PPRUF's competition here
FLLIY vs CJEWF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CJEWF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CJEWF's competition here
FLLIY vs CJEWY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CJEWY trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CJEWY's competition here
FLLIY vs PRDSY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PRDSY trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PRDSY's competition here
FLLIY vs SWGAY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SWGAY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 159.38. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SWGAY's competition here
FLLIY vs SWGNF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SWGNF trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 158.06. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SWGNF's competition here
FLLIY vs PRDSF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PRDSF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PRDSF's competition here
FLLIY vs SWGAF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SWGAF trades at $211.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 139.21. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SWGAF's competition here
FLLIY vs BCUCY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BCUCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BCUCY's competition here
FLLIY vs PNDZF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PNDZF trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PNDZF's competition here
FLLIY vs BBRYF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BBRYF trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -177.70. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BBRYF's competition here
FLLIY vs BURBY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BURBY trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -163.85. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BURBY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BURBY's competition here
FLLIY vs LKFLF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while LKFLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check LKFLF's competition here
FLLIY vs PANDY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check PANDY's competition here
FLLIY vs SFRGF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SFRGF trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SFRGF's competition here
FLLIY vs WOSGF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while WOSGF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check WOSGF's competition here
FLLIY vs SFRGY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SFRGY trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SFRGY's competition here
FLLIY vs CHOWF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CHOWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CHOWF's competition here
FLLIY vs EPRJF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while EPRJF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check EPRJF's competition here
FLLIY vs DCOHF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while DCOHF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check DCOHF's competition here
FLLIY vs ZAPNF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check ZAPNF's competition here
FLLIY vs TSSJF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while TSSJF trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check TSSJF's competition here
FLLIY vs ORWHF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while ORWHF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check ORWHF's competition here
FLLIY vs CEBTF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CEBTF's competition here
FLLIY vs HENGF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check HENGF's competition here
FLLIY vs CTTLF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check CTTLF's competition here
FLLIY vs HENGY Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check HENGY's competition here
FLLIY vs MNNGF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while MNNGF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check MNNGF's competition here
FLLIY vs MENEF Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while MENEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check MENEF's competition here
FLLIY vs MDNL Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check MDNL's competition here
FLLIY vs MAJJ Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check MAJJ's competition here
FLLIY vs BANI Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BANI's competition here
FLLIY vs EATR Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check EATR's competition here
FLLIY vs BRGO Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BRGO's competition here
FLLIY vs MASN Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MASN's ROE of +11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check MASN's competition here
FLLIY vs BRGOD Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check BRGOD's competition here
FLLIY vs SSOK Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 69K. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while SSOK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check SSOK's competition here
FLLIY vs AVEW Comparison February 2026
FLLIY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLLIY stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, FLLIY is priced at $2.10, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLLIY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLLIY's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLLIY is more volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLLIY.Check AVEW's competition here