Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust (FLGMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLGMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGMF | $17.62 | +0.00% | 675.8M | 2.46 | $7.17 | N/A |
| LGMMY | $16.21 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 3.59 | $4.51 | +5.23% |
| LEGIF | $60.85 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 3.37 | $18.03 | +5.60% |
| CDPYF | $25.09 | +1.99% | 3.8B | 2508.90 | $0.01 | +4.48% |
| ADZZF | $1,050.00 | +0.00% | 3B | 26.18 | $40.11 | +3.98% |
| BOWFF | $45.93 | -0.20% | 2.2B | 69.73 | $0.66 | +2.63% |
| KMMPF | $13.16 | +0.00% | 1.6B | -94.00 | -$0.14 | +3.97% |
| JRHIF | $642.54 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 17.48 | $36.75 | +5.41% |
| IIPZF | $9.10 | -5.70% | 1.3B | 303.33 | $0.03 | +3.15% |
| INGEF | $2.88 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 11.98 | $0.24 | +2.18% |
Stock Comparison
FLGMF vs LGMMY Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while LGMMY trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check LGMMY's competition here
FLGMF vs LEGIF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while LEGIF trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check LEGIF's competition here
FLGMF vs CDPYF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, CDPYF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while CDPYF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CDPYF's P/E ratio is 2508.90. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDPYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to CDPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check CDPYF's competition here
FLGMF vs ADZZF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, ADZZF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while ADZZF trades at $1,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ADZZF's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADZZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to ADZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check ADZZF's competition here
FLGMF vs BOWFF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, BOWFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while BOWFF trades at $45.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas BOWFF's P/E ratio is 69.73. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOWFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and BOWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOWFF's competition here
FLGMF vs KMMPF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, KMMPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while KMMPF trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas KMMPF's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to KMMPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and KMMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMMPF's competition here
FLGMF vs JRHIF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, JRHIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while JRHIF trades at $642.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas JRHIF's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to JRHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to JRHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check JRHIF's competition here
FLGMF vs IIPZF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, IIPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while IIPZF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IIPZF's P/E ratio is 303.33. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIPZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to IIPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check IIPZF's competition here
FLGMF vs INGEF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, INGEF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while INGEF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas INGEF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to INGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to INGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check INGEF's competition here
FLGMF vs MIAPF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MIAPF has a market cap of 783M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MIAPF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MIAPF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MIAPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to MIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check MIAPF's competition here
FLGMF vs RSHPF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, RSHPF has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while RSHPF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas RSHPF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSHPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to RSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check RSHPF's competition here
FLGMF vs MNARF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MNARF has a market cap of 423.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MNARF trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MNARF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNARF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to MNARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check MNARF's competition here
FLGMF vs BSRTF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, BSRTF has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while BSRTF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas BSRTF's P/E ratio is 236.40. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSRTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to BSRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check BSRTF's competition here
FLGMF vs MHCUF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MHCUF has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MHCUF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MHCUF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MHCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to MHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check MHCUF's competition here
FLGMF vs DRREF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, DRREF has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while DRREF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DRREF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRREF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to DRREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check DRREF's competition here
FLGMF vs UMRRF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, UMRRF has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while UMRRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas UMRRF's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to UMRRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to UMRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check UMRRF's competition here
FLGMF vs MRTI Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MRTI has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MRTI trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MRTI's P/E ratio is -72.57. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MRTI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and MRTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRTI's competition here
FLGMF vs FCAFF Comparison June 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, FCAFF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while FCAFF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas FCAFF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to FCAFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to FCAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check FCAFF's competition here