Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust
Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust (FLGMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLGMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGMF | $17.62 | +0.00% | 675.8M | 2.46 | $7.17 | N/A |
| CDPYF | $26.80 | +0.04% | 4.1B | 29.45 | $0.91 | +4.19% |
| ADZZF | $1,050.00 | +0.00% | 3B | 25.70 | $40.85 | +3.98% |
| ATRRF | $128.23 | +0.00% | 3B | 291.42 | $0.44 | +7.32% |
| BOWFF | $48.37 | -2.05% | 2.3B | 17.15 | $2.82 | +2.48% |
| KMMPF | $12.73 | +0.67% | 1.6B | 70.72 | $0.18 | +4.11% |
| JRHIF | $642.54 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 17.48 | $36.75 | +5.38% |
| IIPZF | $9.54 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -18.00 | -$0.53 | +3.03% |
| INGEF | $3.04 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 12.68 | $0.24 | +2.06% |
| RSHPF | $1.15 | -4.17% | 603.1M | 10.45 | $0.11 | +5.00% |
Stock Comparison
FLGMF vs CDPYF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, CDPYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while CDPYF trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CDPYF's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDPYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to CDPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check CDPYF's competition here
FLGMF vs ADZZF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, ADZZF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while ADZZF trades at $1,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ADZZF's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADZZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to ADZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check ADZZF's competition here
FLGMF vs ATRRF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, ATRRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while ATRRF trades at $128.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ATRRF's P/E ratio is 291.42. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATRRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to ATRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check ATRRF's competition here
FLGMF vs BOWFF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, BOWFF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while BOWFF trades at $48.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas BOWFF's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOWFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to BOWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check BOWFF's competition here
FLGMF vs KMMPF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, KMMPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while KMMPF trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas KMMPF's P/E ratio is 70.72. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to KMMPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to KMMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check KMMPF's competition here
FLGMF vs JRHIF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, JRHIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while JRHIF trades at $642.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas JRHIF's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to JRHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to JRHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check JRHIF's competition here
FLGMF vs IIPZF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, IIPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while IIPZF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IIPZF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIPZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and IIPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIPZF's competition here
FLGMF vs INGEF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, INGEF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while INGEF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas INGEF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to INGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to INGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check INGEF's competition here
FLGMF vs RSHPF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, RSHPF has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while RSHPF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas RSHPF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSHPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and RSHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSHPF's competition here
FLGMF vs MNARF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MNARF has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MNARF trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MNARF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNARF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to MNARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check MNARF's competition here
FLGMF vs BSRTF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, BSRTF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while BSRTF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas BSRTF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSRTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to BSRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check BSRTF's competition here
FLGMF vs MHCUF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MHCUF has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MHCUF trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MHCUF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MHCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to MHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check MHCUF's competition here
FLGMF vs DRREF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, DRREF has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while DRREF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DRREF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRREF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to DRREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check DRREF's competition here
FLGMF vs UMRRF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, UMRRF has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while UMRRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas UMRRF's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to UMRRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to UMRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check UMRRF's competition here
FLGMF vs MRTI Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, MRTI has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while MRTI trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MRTI's P/E ratio is -61.95. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to MRTI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF and MRTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRTI's competition here
FLGMF vs FCAFF Comparison May 2026
FLGMF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGMF stands at 675.8M. In comparison, FCAFF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGMF is priced at $17.62, while FCAFF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGMF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas FCAFF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FLGMF's ROE is N/A, compared to FCAFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGMF is less volatile compared to FCAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGMF.Check FCAFF's competition here