FIT Hon Teng Limited
FIT Hon Teng Limited FITGF Peers
See (FITGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITGF | $0.23 | -3.76% | 1.65B | 11.65 | $0.02 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $439.41 | -0.11% | 106.57B | 39.59 | $11.10 | +0.51% |
| HNHPF | $10.44 | -1.04% | 72.51B | 14.70 | $0.71 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.23B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $14.93 | +0.04% | 27.80B | 17.56 | $0.85 | +2.59% |
| HXGBF | $10.48 | +3.66% | 26.98B | 26.20 | $0.40 | +1.36% |
| HXGBY | $9.92 | -1.58% | 26.76B | 24.81 | $0.40 | +1.22% |
| MRAAY | $6.97 | -0.85% | 25.96B | 16.60 | $0.42 | +0.75% |
| TTDKY | $10.80 | -1.26% | 20.49B | 18.31 | $0.59 | +0.87% |
| TTDKF | $10.80 | -2.45% | 20.49B | 16.61 | $0.65 | +2.05% |
Stock Comparison
FITGF vs KYCCF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 106.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while KYCCF trades at $439.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HNHPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 72.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HNHPF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HNHAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and HNHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs MRAAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 27.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MRAAF trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HXGBF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HXGBF trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and HXGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs HXGBY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HXGBY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs MRAAY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 25.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MRAAY trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TTDKY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TTDKY trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TTDKF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TTDKF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs VEMLY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VEMLY trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs BYDIY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BYDIY trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and BYDIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs BYDIF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BYDIF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and BYDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs SOTGY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SOTGY trades at $83.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SNPTF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs MNBEY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and MNBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs SHMZF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and SHMZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs MNBEF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs OMRNY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while OMRNY trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs IBIDF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and IBIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs AUOTY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AUOTY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is -47.31. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HRSEF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HPHTF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs KGBLY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while KGBLY trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs VEMLF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and VEMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs SEPJF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SEPJF trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HRIBF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SEPJY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TOPCF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HPHTY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TYOYY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TYOYY trades at $70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 159.65. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs RNSHF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs APELF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and APELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs CODAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs APELY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while APELY trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and APELY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs AMANF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs VAIAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs JELLF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs NPEGF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NPEGF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -148.07. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs NILRF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and NILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs JNPKF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs JPAVF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs BCNAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs AITUF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and AITUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs AUDGF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and AUDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs ASAAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 736.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs CAZGF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 692.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while CAZGF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and CAZGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs BCNAY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 600.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and BCNAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs VARXF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs JNNDF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HNMUF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 468.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs JPDYY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and JPDYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs KRKNF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 457.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while KRKNF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HROEY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and HROEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs TRUHF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 366.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and TRUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs NNFTF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs KACPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 225.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while KACPF trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TTGPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 181.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TTGPF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SMOPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and SMOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs NPTSF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs CHAEF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs FUBAF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -74.42. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs HUDLF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and HUDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs ENMPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs ENMPY Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 110.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ENMPY trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs IACYF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs ODYS Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 88.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ODYS trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs IKGPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and IKGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs SDIIF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs MPAD Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs ACFN Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ACFN trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SILLF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 44.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SILLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs AATC Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AATC trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs YNVYF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 23.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs FGRRF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and FGRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs ERMG Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and ERMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs ROBOF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ROBOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs IEHC Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 22.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while IEHC trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs NSCIF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and NSCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs INRD Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs WELX Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while WELX trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs BMNR Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 15.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BMNR trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs KESPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and KESPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs AAIRF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SIGL Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SIGL trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs BNSOF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs SCND Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SCND trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs LCTC Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 7.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while LCTC trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs ZTSTF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ZTSTF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs ESHSF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs GNCLF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while GNCLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TNLX Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TNLX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs DPLS Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs RMTD Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMTD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs MRRYF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs TRCK Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while TRCK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs VPER Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF and VPER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FITGF vs SRMX Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs VPIM Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.
FITGF vs NXOPF Comparison
FITGF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITGF stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FITGF is priced at $0.23, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FITGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FITGF is less volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITGF.