Fingerprint Cards AB (publ)
Fingerprint Cards AB (publ) FGRRF Peers
See (FGRRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGRRF | $0.00 | -33.33% | 15.16M | -0.10 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $427.52 | -0.90% | 103.68B | 37.87 | $11.29 | +0.51% |
| HNHPF | $10.23 | +0.05% | 71.01B | 12.62 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | -0.12% | 45.23B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.34 | +0.24% | 28.56B | 17.83 | $0.86 | +2.52% |
| HXGBF | $10.48 | +11.97% | 26.98B | 26.20 | $0.40 | +1.51% |
| HXGBY | $10.01 | -0.60% | 26.84B | 24.41 | $0.41 | +1.23% |
| MRAAY | $7.10 | -0.28% | 26.45B | 19.19 | $0.37 | +0.74% |
| TTDKY | $10.63 | -1.57% | 20.17B | 17.72 | $0.60 | +0.88% |
| TTDKF | $9.73 | -7.13% | 18.46B | 16.21 | $0.60 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
FGRRF vs KYCCF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 103.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $427.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HNHPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 71.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HNHAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MRAAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HXGBF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HXGBY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MRAAY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 26.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TTDKY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TTDKF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 18.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VEMLY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BYDIF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 10.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BYDIY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SNPTF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SOTGY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SHMZF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MNBEY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MNBEF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs OMRNY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 107.04. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs IBIDF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AUOTY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is -50.67. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HRSEF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HPHTF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SEPJF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VEMLF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HRIBF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SEPJY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TOPCF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HPHTY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs RNSHF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TYOYY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $66.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 150.36. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs APELF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs APELY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs CODAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs KGBLY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs FITGF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AMANF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VAIAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs JELLF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NPEGF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -148.07. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NILRF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs JNPKF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs JPAVF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BCNAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AITUF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AUDGF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs CAZGF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 824.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -52.33. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ASAAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 729.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BCNAY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 600.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VARXF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs JNNDF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs KRKNF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 471.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HNMUF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 468.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs JPDYY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs KACPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 400.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HROEY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TRUHF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NNFTF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BMNR Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 292.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BMNR trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TTGPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 204.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SMOPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NPTSF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs CHAEF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs FUBAF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs HUDLF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ENMPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ENMPY Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 110.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs IACYF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs IKGPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ODYS Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 84.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ODYS trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SDIIF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MPAD Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SILLF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ACFN Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AATC Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 39.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ERMG Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ROBOF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs IEHC Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 22.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs YNVYF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 22.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NSCIF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs INRD Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs WELX Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs KESPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs AAIRF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SCND Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs LCTC Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 7.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs GNCLF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs SIGL Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 6.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ZTSTF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs ESHSF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs TNLX Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs BNSOF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs RMTD Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs MRRYF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs DPLS Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF and DPLS have similar daily volatility (40.00).
FGRRF vs TRCK Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VPER Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs NXOPF Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs VPIM Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.
FGRRF vs GWSO Comparison
FGRRF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGRRF stands at 15.16M. In comparison, GWSO has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FGRRF is priced at $0.00, while GWSO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGRRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GWSO's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FGRRF's ROE is -1.59%, compared to GWSO's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FGRRF is more volatile compared to GWSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGRRF.