Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGQD.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGQD.SW | CHF 7.89 | +0.43% | 711.3M | 18.32 | CHF 0.43 | +2.15% |
PGHN.SW | CHF 1,101.50 | -2.09% | 28.5B | 25.55 | CHF 43.11 | +3.75% |
LYSPH.SW | CHF 241.80 | -0.43% | 19B | N/A | N/A | +1.22% |
EQCH.SW | CHF 383.00 | +0.01% | 12.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
BAER.SW | CHF 55.22 | -0.97% | 11.3B | 13.12 | CHF 4.21 | +4.69% |
IMEA.SW | CHF 79.95 | -0.90% | 10.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
IEUC.SW | CHF 5.89 | -0.12% | 10.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
SCWS.SW | CHF 6.81 | -0.38% | 10.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.29% |
XD9C.SW | CHF 145.30 | +0.71% | 9.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
LQCE.SW | CHF 4.46 | +0.28% | 8.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FGQD.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 1,101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check PGHN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs LYSPH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, LYSPH.SW has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while LYSPH.SW trades at CHF 241.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LYSPH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSPH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to LYSPH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check LYSPH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs EQCH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, EQCH.SW has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while EQCH.SW trades at CHF 383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EQCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQCH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to EQCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check EQCH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs BAER.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, BAER.SW has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while BAER.SW trades at CHF 55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BAER.SW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAER.SW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to BAER.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check BAER.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IMEA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IMEA.SW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IMEA.SW trades at CHF 79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IMEA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to IMEA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IMEA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IEUC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IEUC.SW has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IEUC.SW trades at CHF 5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IEUC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to IEUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IEUC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SCWS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SCWS.SW has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SCWS.SW trades at CHF 6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SCWS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCWS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to SCWS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SCWS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XD9C.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XD9C.SW has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XD9C.SW trades at CHF 145.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XD9C.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9C.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to XD9C.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XD9C.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs LQCE.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, LQCE.SW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while LQCE.SW trades at CHF 4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LQCE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQCE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to LQCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check LQCE.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 172.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check VZN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AWESGS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AWESGS.SW has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AWESGS.SW trades at CHF 18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AWESGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWESGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to AWESGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AWESGS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs VHYL.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, VHYL.SW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while VHYL.SW trades at CHF 60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VHYL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to VHYL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check VHYL.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs EMUCHF.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, EMUCHF.SW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while EMUCHF.SW trades at CHF 23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EMUCHF.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUCHF.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to EMUCHF.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check EMUCHF.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs WSRUS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, WSRUS.SW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while WSRUS.SW trades at CHF 29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas WSRUS.SW's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRUS.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to WSRUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check WSRUS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSSX5E.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CHDVD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CHDVD.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CHDVD.SW trades at CHF 164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CHDVD.SW's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDVD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CHDVD.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CHDVD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 144.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CHSPI.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SHIR.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SHIR.SW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SHIR.SW trades at CHF 4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SHIR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHIR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to SHIR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SHIR.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs MVSH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, MVSH.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while MVSH.SW trades at CHF 7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MVSH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVSH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to MVSH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check MVSH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs MSEC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, MSEC.SW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while MSEC.SW trades at CHF 178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MSEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to MSEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check MSEC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check VONN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CMES.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CMES.SW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CMES.SW trades at CHF 4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CMES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMES.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to CMES.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CMES.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XMCJ.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XMCJ.SW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XMCJ.SW trades at CHF 28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XMCJ.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMCJ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to XMCJ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XMCJ.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs VJPN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, VJPN.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while VJPN.SW trades at CHF 32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VJPN.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VJPN.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to VJPN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check VJPN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 121.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SMICHA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XDUE.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XDUE.SW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XDUE.SW trades at CHF 24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XDUE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDUE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to XDUE.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XDUE.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IBGX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IBGX.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IBGX.SW trades at CHF 150.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IBGX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to IBGX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IBGX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSSMI.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XSMC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XSMC.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XSMC.SW trades at CHF 147.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XSMC.SW's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSMC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to XSMC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XSMC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 111.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AUCHAH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs FWRA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, FWRA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while FWRA.SW trades at CHF 6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FWRA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWRA.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to FWRA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check FWRA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IMBA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IMBA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IMBA.SW trades at CHF 4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IMBA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to IMBA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IMBA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check EMDA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IWDC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IWDC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IWDC.SW trades at CHF 81.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IWDC.SW's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to IWDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IWDC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XDPC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XDPC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XDPC.SW trades at CHF 58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XDPC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to XDPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XDPC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SRECHA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check DAXD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs HBMN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, HBMN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while HBMN.SW trades at CHF 169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HBMN.SW's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBMN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to HBMN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check HBMN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSSMIM.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IUKD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IUKD.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IUKD.SW trades at CHF 9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IUKD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to IUKD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IUKD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs MVEC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, MVEC.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while MVEC.SW trades at CHF 6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MVEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to MVEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check MVEC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IDVY.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IDVY.SW has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IDVY.SW trades at CHF 20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IDVY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDVY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to IDVY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IDVY.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs DMFC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, DMFC.SW has a market cap of 713M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while DMFC.SW trades at CHF 8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DMFC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMFC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to DMFC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check DMFC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IUSC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IUSC.SW has a market cap of 708.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IUSC.SW trades at CHF 96.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IUSC.SW's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to IUSC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IUSC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ASOL.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ASOL.SW has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ASOL.SW trades at CHF 93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ASOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASOL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ASOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ASOL.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 683.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 208.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSSLI.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XUHY.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XUHY.SW has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XUHY.SW trades at CHF 10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XUHY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUHY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to XUHY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XUHY.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs STNX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, STNX.SW has a market cap of 589.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while STNX.SW trades at CHF 186.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas STNX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to STNX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check STNX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check MLP.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSBGC0.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSBGC0.SW has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSBGC0.SW trades at CHF 105.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSBGC0.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBGC0.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSBGC0.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSBGC0.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs STZX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, STZX.SW has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while STZX.SW trades at CHF 111.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas STZX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STZX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to STZX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check STZX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 479M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSGLDC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs XDCH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, XDCH.SW has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while XDCH.SW trades at CHF 25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas XDCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to XDCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check XDCH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 110.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ID25.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs DXJD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, DXJD.SW has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while DXJD.SW trades at CHF 41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DXJD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXJD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to DXJD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check DXJD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs LEON.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, LEON.SW has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while LEON.SW trades at CHF 17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LEON.SW's P/E ratio is -593.33. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEON.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to LEON.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check LEON.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs USCHWH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, USCHWH.SW has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while USCHWH.SW trades at CHF 46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas USCHWH.SW's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USCHWH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to USCHWH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check USCHWH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AETH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AETH.SW has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AETH.SW trades at CHF 33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AETH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AETH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to AETH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AETH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check COMS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SMOR.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSBGC3.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSBGC3.SW has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSBGC3.SW trades at CHF 63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSBGC3.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBGC3.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC3.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSBGC3.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs STUX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, STUX.SW has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while STUX.SW trades at CHF 186.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas STUX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STUX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to STUX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check STUX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IJPC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IJPC.SW has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IJPC.SW trades at CHF 98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IJPC.SW's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to IJPC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IJPC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check PEHN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs GHYC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, GHYC.SW has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while GHYC.SW trades at CHF 72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GHYC.SW's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHYC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to GHYC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check GHYC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs LQDH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, LQDH.SW has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while LQDH.SW trades at CHF 85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LQDH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to LQDH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check LQDH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ETHW.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ETHW.SW has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ETHW.SW trades at CHF 30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ETHW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHW.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ETHW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ETHW.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs EMUC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, EMUC.SW has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while EMUC.SW trades at CHF 8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EMUC.SW's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to EMUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check EMUC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check GAM.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check BBN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ZPAL.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SPCE.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ALPN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 109.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check IT25.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AADA.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AADA.SW has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AADA.SW trades at CHF 11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AADA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AADA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to AADA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AADA.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check NBEN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check INGS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check FOOD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CPEN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check FIND.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs HODLX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, HODLX.SW has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while HODLX.SW trades at CHF 32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HODLX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HODLX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to HODLX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check HODLX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ADOT.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check RUS.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ABNB.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ABNB.SW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ABNB.SW trades at CHF 53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ABNB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABNB.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ABNB.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ABNB.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ABCH.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ABCH.SW has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ABCH.SW trades at CHF 24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ABCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to ABCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ABCH.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AVAX.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AVAX.SW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AVAX.SW trades at CHF 3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AVAX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVAX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to AVAX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AVAX.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check SBTC.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs ADAW.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, ADAW.SW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while ADAW.SW trades at CHF 7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADAW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to ADAW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check ADAW.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check EEII.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check DOTW.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 135.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check 0P00015M0N.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs NEWN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, NEWN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while NEWN.SW trades at CHF 0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NEWN.SW's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWN.SW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to NEWN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check NEWN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CASN.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check FFI.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs INSU.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, INSU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while INSU.SW trades at CHF 73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas INSU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INSU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to INSU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check INSU.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs CSEMU.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, CSEMU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while CSEMU.SW trades at CHF 157.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSEMU.SW's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSEMU.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is less volatile compared to CSEMU.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check CSEMU.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check TNOD.SW's competition here
FGQD.SW vs AUTD.SW Comparison August 2025
FGQD.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGQD.SW stands at 711.3M. In comparison, AUTD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGQD.SW is priced at CHF 7.89, while AUTD.SW trades at CHF 101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGQD.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AUTD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGQD.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUTD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGQD.SW is more volatile compared to AUTD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGQD.SW.Check AUTD.SW's competition here