Fuxing China Group Limited

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while RL trades at $376.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to RL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check RL's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while GIL trades at $71.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check GIL's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while LEVI trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check LEVI's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while VFC trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VFC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check VFC's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while KTB trades at $67.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check KTB's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while UAA trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check UAA's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while PVH trades at $69.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check PVH's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while COLM trades at $62.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check COLM's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while UA trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check UA's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while ZGN trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check ZGN's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while HBI trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HBI's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check HBI's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while FIGS trades at $11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 102.18. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check FIGS's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while AIN trades at $59.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check AIN's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while GIII trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check GIII's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while GOOS trades at $12.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 77.88. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check GOOS's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while OXM trades at $39.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is -159.08. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to OXM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check OXM's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while SGC trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check SGC's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while LAKE trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check LAKE's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while UFI trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check UFI's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while CULP trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check CULP's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while JRSH trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JRSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check JRSH's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while VNCE trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check VNCE's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while NCI trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check NCI's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while JL trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check JL's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while LLL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check LLL's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while XELB trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check XELB's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while PMNT trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNT's ROE of -10.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check PMNT's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while DXYN trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ and DXYN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DXYN's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while JXJT trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check JXJT's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while DLA trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check DLA's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, PERY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while PERY trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ and PERY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERY's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while SQBG trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check SQBG's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while EVK trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check EVK's competition here

FFFZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFFZ stands at 68.8M. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFFZ is priced at $4.00, while KBSF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FFFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFFZ is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFFZ.Check KBSF's competition here