Fearless Films, Inc.
Fearless Films, Inc. FERL Peers
See (FERL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FERL | $0.00 | -95.00% | 3390.00 | -0.00 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| UNVGY | $15.17 | +1.63% | 55.64B | 24.09 | $0.63 | +1.77% |
| UMGNF | $30.22 | +0.00% | 55.41B | 24.18 | $1.25 | +2.02% |
| FWONB | $80.50 | -7.66% | 27.46B | 1341.67 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.30 | +1.53% | 17.74B | 105.00 | $0.06 | +1.34% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | N/A | 16.88B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMY | $28.75 | -11.54% | 11.04B | 30.91 | $0.93 | N/A |
| CEVMF | $110.90 | N/A | 10.65B | 30.14 | $3.68 | N/A |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.57B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $43.45 | N/A | 7.22B | 21.62 | $2.01 | +0.56% |
Stock Comparison
FERL vs UNVGY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 55.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while UNVGY trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs UMGNF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 55.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while UMGNF trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs FWONB Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 27.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while FWONB trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1341.67. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BOIVF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BOIVF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NWSAL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CEVMY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CEVMY trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CEVMF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CEVMF trades at $110.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs VIVEF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs TKCOF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs TOEAF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while TOEAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs VIVHY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while VIVHY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MCHOY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MCHOY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MCOIF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MHSDF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MHSDF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CYFWY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NANHF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CYFWF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NNMTF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NENTY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ATVDY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ATVDY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs JVTSF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while JVTSF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -360.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AIOSF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AIOSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs TCLRY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL and TCLRY have similar daily volatility (163.64).
FERL vs CIEZF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CPXGF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 468.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CPXGF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BORUF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 452.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BORUF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs WLDBF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 307.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while WLDBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs IMXCF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 305.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while IMXCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CLQDF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AFCJF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CLTFF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 187.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CLTFF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NENTF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 162.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs APTTF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while APTTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs DTTVY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 108.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs GOAI Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 92.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while GOAI trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -24.58. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs STEAF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ANGMF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs THBRF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 42.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while THBRF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs GMSQF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ZUMRF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs LGMH Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs APHP Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 28.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while APHP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs OAMCF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 25.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while OAMCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -19.97. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs QYOUF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 18.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ICABY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ICABY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs HWAL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 14.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while HWAL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ASGRF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BBOP Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBOP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CNWGQ Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs XOEEF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MVNC Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 7.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CNNWQ Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AMFL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 5.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AMFL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ICABF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs HHSE Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs STGZ Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while STGZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BLIBQ Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ENTEF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ENTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs LTES Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CAPV Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs ITVI Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BLIAQ Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs HDUP Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs NETWF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while NETWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs EEGI Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BSEG Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BSEG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs SEGI Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs GULDF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 1.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs STCXF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AFOM Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925286.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs VNUE Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 886278.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs UMGP Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 853816.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while UMGP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs HQGE Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 773992.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AMNNF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736064.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs RLTR Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 621756.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs WRIT Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 578200.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CCLX Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499820.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs TAMG Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463682.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BOTY Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460484.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MIKP Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 445400.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs WEBB Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389826.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs IMTV Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313681.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs VGTL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308743.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs CEXE Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260304.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEXE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs TRMNF Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 258474.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while TRMNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs RIVU Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244876.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs MLFB Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148773.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs BRSE Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 123628.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while BRSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs SNMN Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112921.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs RWMI Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109089.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs SAPX Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 73253.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs URBT Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63000.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs SVSN Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58008.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs GBHL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57053.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs AMRU Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47158.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs HOMU Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37523.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs SAKL Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 34916.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs XSPT Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33260.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.
FERL vs PLFX Comparison
FERL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FERL stands at 3390.00. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 28406.00. Regarding current trading prices, FERL is priced at $0.00, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FERL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FERL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FERL is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FERL.