Fidelity Holding Corp.
Fidelity Holding Corp. (FDHC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDHC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDHC | $0.00 | -0.00% | 37.9M | -0.57 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 700.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FDHC vs QMIS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QMIS's competition here
FDHC vs GSHN Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSHN's competition here
FDHC vs KATX Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check KATX's competition here
FDHC vs CCYC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCYC's competition here
FDHC vs ZSYC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ZSYC's competition here
FDHC vs WCHS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check WCHS's competition here
FDHC vs WPCBF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPCBF's competition here
FDHC vs NOTR Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check NOTR's competition here
FDHC vs FZRO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZRO's competition here
FDHC vs RGLG Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check RGLG's competition here
FDHC vs CINV Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CINV's competition here
FDHC vs DVTC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVTC's competition here
FDHC vs AMRR Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRR's competition here
FDHC vs BTOW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while BTOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to BTOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check BTOW's competition here
FDHC vs KAST Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check KAST's competition here
FDHC vs TGLO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while TGLO trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and TGLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGLO's competition here
FDHC vs GIPL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GIPL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check GIPL's competition here
FDHC vs TRFE Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRFE's competition here
FDHC vs NMTT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMTT's competition here
FDHC vs RMGCF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check RMGCF's competition here
FDHC vs SCGX Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check SCGX's competition here
FDHC vs ATAQF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ATAQF's competition here
FDHC vs WWHC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWHC's competition here
FDHC vs CHAAW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHAAW's competition here
FDHC vs XITO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while XITO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check XITO's competition here
FDHC vs CREEF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check CREEF's competition here
FDHC vs WAYS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAYS's competition here
FDHC vs CMCAF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCAF's competition here
FDHC vs AWCA Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AWCA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AWCA's competition here
FDHC vs XTPT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while XTPT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check XTPT's competition here
FDHC vs GWIN Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GWIN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWIN's competition here
FDHC vs AASP Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AASP trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -22.07. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AASP's competition here
FDHC vs PTCP Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCP's competition here
FDHC vs CAHO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CAHO trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and CAHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAHO's competition here
FDHC vs ATMS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATMS's competition here
FDHC vs JMTM Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check JMTM's competition here
FDHC vs KWACW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWACW's competition here
FDHC vs KWAC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWAC's competition here
FDHC vs AVNI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AVNI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -41.99. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AVNI's competition here
FDHC vs MDWK Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while MDWK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check MDWK's competition here
FDHC vs PMVCW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and PMVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMVCW's competition here
FDHC vs WBQNL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WBQNL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and WBQNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WBQNL's competition here
FDHC vs CNXX Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CNXX trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check CNXX's competition here
FDHC vs ATMH Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ATMH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ATMH's competition here
FDHC vs CNWHF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CNWHF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CNWHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CNWHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CNWHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to CNWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check CNWHF's competition here
FDHC vs IDIG Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while IDIG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check IDIG's competition here
FDHC vs OOGI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OOGI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while OOGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas OOGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to OOGI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and OOGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OOGI's competition here
FDHC vs NPFC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPFC's competition here
FDHC vs CBBB Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check CBBB's competition here
FDHC vs ADCV Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCV's competition here
FDHC vs XCPT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while XCPT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and XCPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XCPT's competition here
FDHC vs FWFW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while FWFW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check FWFW's competition here
FDHC vs EVTK Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while EVTK trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -400.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check EVTK's competition here
FDHC vs GTVI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTVI's competition here
FDHC vs UGHB Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, UGHB has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while UGHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas UGHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to UGHB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and UGHB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UGHB's competition here
FDHC vs ACBD Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ACBD's competition here
FDHC vs ECGR Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ECGR's competition here
FDHC vs USBL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check USBL's competition here
FDHC vs AOAO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AOAO's competition here
FDHC vs PCMC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while PCMC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check PCMC's competition here
FDHC vs SLTN Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SLTN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLTN's competition here
FDHC vs NIHL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NIHL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check NIHL's competition here
FDHC vs TCRI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while TCRI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and TCRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCRI's competition here
FDHC vs AZRH Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AZRH's competition here
FDHC vs ELLH Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ELLH trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ELLH's competition here
FDHC vs WRPT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check WRPT's competition here
FDHC vs PSCO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while PSCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and PSCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSCO's competition here
FDHC vs NHICW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NHICW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to NHICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check NHICW's competition here
FDHC vs STLY Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while STLY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check STLY's competition here
FDHC vs LWLW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LWLW's competition here
FDHC vs LNMG Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while LNMG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and LNMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNMG's competition here
FDHC vs BOREF Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while BOREF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check BOREF's competition here
FDHC vs ITRX Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ITRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITRX's competition here
FDHC vs GFOO Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GFOO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GFOO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GFOO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GFOO's ROE of +42.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to GFOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check GFOO's competition here
FDHC vs BDCM Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check BDCM's competition here
FDHC vs NGRC Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NGRC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check NGRC's competition here
FDHC vs SITS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SITS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check SITS's competition here
FDHC vs SSHT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SSHT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check SSHT's competition here
FDHC vs FUNR Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and FUNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUNR's competition here
FDHC vs NRCD Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRCD's competition here
FDHC vs WHLT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check WHLT's competition here
FDHC vs SHGI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SHGI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SHGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SHGI's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SHGI's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and SHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGI's competition here
FDHC vs ASNB Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check ASNB's competition here
FDHC vs FSTJ Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FSTJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while FSTJ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas FSTJ's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to FSTJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to FSTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check FSTJ's competition here
FDHC vs AGSS Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while AGSS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check AGSS's competition here
FDHC vs MTRI Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check MTRI's competition here
FDHC vs PLPL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PLPL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while PLPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas PLPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PLPL's ROE of +17.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and PLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLPL's competition here
FDHC vs SMPP Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while SMPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check SMPP's competition here
FDHC vs GRNL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GRNL has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GRNL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GRNL's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GRNL's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to GRNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check GRNL's competition here
FDHC vs FORW Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check FORW's competition here
FDHC vs CDBT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check CDBT's competition here
FDHC vs LRGR Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while LRGR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check LRGR's competition here
FDHC vs HKBT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check HKBT's competition here
FDHC vs XSVT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSVT's competition here
FDHC vs WNFT Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check WNFT's competition here
FDHC vs GDVM Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check GDVM's competition here
FDHC vs HPIL Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDHC.Check HPIL's competition here
FDHC vs ENGA Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGA's competition here
FDHC vs HBIE Comparison July 2025
FDHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDHC stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDHC is priced at $0.00, while HBIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.57, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDHC's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FDHC and HBIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HBIE's competition here