Fission Uranium Corp.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, CCJ has a market cap of 22.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CCJ trades at $50.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CCJ's P/E ratio is 123.76. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to CCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NATKY trades at $35.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to NATKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRUUF trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, NXE has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NXE trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NXE's P/E ratio is -57.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAD trades at $10.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, UEC has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while UEC trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas UEC's P/E ratio is -37.97. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UEC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to UEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAF trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -100.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, LEU has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while LEU trades at $93.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas LEU's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LEU's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to LEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CGNMF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, DNN has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while DNN trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas DNN's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DNN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to DNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while YLLXF trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, UUUU has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while UUUU trades at $4.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas UUUU's P/E ratio is -16.98. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UUUU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to UUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 817.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while DYLLF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 339.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BNNLF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 318.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ISENF trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, EU has a market cap of 317.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EU trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EU's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to EU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, URG has a market cap of 260.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while URG trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas URG's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to URG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to URG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, UROY has a market cap of 257.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while UROY trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas UROY's P/E ratio is 64.33. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UROY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to UROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 178.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKLRF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 85.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SASKF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 76.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MGAFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 75.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FISOF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 71.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FUUFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 70.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AUEEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PENMF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 60.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ELVUF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 49.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ANLDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while LURAF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 38.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while WSTRF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NTELF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 32.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while GVXXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 23.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ADRLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -23.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 12.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MMTLF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 12.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BSENF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while APAAF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +7.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 10.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while KVLQF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 9.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PTUUF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 7.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AZURF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 4.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 4.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SUUFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, STTDF has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while STTDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas STTDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STTDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to STTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 1.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NVTQF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 492853.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NRUNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419145.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21779.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ENCUF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.

FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433.03M. In comparison, ISOU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ISOU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ISOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISOU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCUUF has daily volatility of 0.85 and ISOU has daily volatility of N/A.