Fission Uranium Corp.
Fission Uranium Corp. (FCUUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCUUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUUF | $0.50 | +0.85% | 433M | -50.42 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 15.3B | -3.77 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NATKY | $42.57 | -1.91% | 11B | 6.92 | $6.15 | +5.78% |
| SRUUF | $16.10 | -1.41% | 4.6B | -3.51 | -$4.61 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.92% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.28 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 28.00 | $0.01 | +0.46% |
| PALAF | $3.96 | -2.82% | 1.6B | -98.37 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| YLLXF | $6.56 | +1.55% | 1.4B | -3.04 | -$2.16 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $0.97 | +1.10% | 943.7M | -97.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BNNLF | $1.59 | -8.62% | 326.6M | -53.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FCUUF vs EGRAF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check EGRAF's competition here
FCUUF vs NATKY Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NATKY trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to NATKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check NATKY's competition here
FCUUF vs SRUUF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRUUF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check SRUUF's competition here
FCUUF vs PALAD Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check PALAD's competition here
FCUUF vs CGNMF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CGNMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check CGNMF's competition here
FCUUF vs PALAF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -98.37. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check PALAF's competition here
FCUUF vs YLLXF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while YLLXF trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check YLLXF's competition here
FCUUF vs DYLLF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 943.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while DYLLF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check DYLLF's competition here
FCUUF vs BNNLF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BNNLF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check BNNLF's competition here
FCUUF vs ISENF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ISENF's competition here
FCUUF vs EGRAY Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check EGRAY's competition here
FCUUF vs BKLRF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKLRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check BKLRF's competition here
FCUUF vs SASKF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SASKF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check SASKF's competition here
FCUUF vs AUEEF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AUEEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check AUEEF's competition here
FCUUF vs FUUFF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FUUFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check FUUFF's competition here
FCUUF vs ANLDF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ANLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ANLDF's competition here
FCUUF vs FISOF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check FISOF's competition here
FCUUF vs MGAFF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MGAFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check MGAFF's competition here
FCUUF vs ELVUF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ELVUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ELVUF's competition here
FCUUF vs PENMF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PENMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check PENMF's competition here
FCUUF vs ADRLF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ADRLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -21.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ADRLF's competition here
FCUUF vs LURAF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check LURAF's competition here
FCUUF vs GVXXF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while GVXXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check GVXXF's competition here
FCUUF vs WSTRF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while WSTRF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check WSTRF's competition here
FCUUF vs NTELF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check NTELF's competition here
FCUUF vs PTUUF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PTUUF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check PTUUF's competition here
FCUUF vs APAAF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while APAAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check APAAF's competition here
FCUUF vs MMTLF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MMTLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check MMTLF's competition here
FCUUF vs CKEFF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check CKEFF's competition here
FCUUF vs BKUCF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +5.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check BKUCF's competition here
FCUUF vs KVLQF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while KVLQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check KVLQF's competition here
FCUUF vs BSENF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BSENF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check BSENF's competition here
FCUUF vs AZURF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AZURF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check AZURF's competition here
FCUUF vs ALXEF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ALXEF's competition here
FCUUF vs SUUFF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SUUFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check SUUFF's competition here
FCUUF vs STTDF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, STTDF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while STTDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas STTDF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STTDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to STTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check STTDF's competition here
FCUUF vs SRSIF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check SRSIF's competition here
FCUUF vs NVTQF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NVTQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check NVTQF's competition here
FCUUF vs NRUNF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 596.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NRUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check NRUNF's competition here
FCUUF vs XEPRF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check XEPRF's competition here
FCUUF vs JTCMF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check JTCMF's competition here
FCUUF vs ENCUF Comparison July 2025
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.Check ENCUF's competition here