Fission Uranium Corp.
Fission Uranium Corp. FCUUF Peers
See (FCUUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUUF | $0.50 | +0.84% | 433M | -50.42 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NATKY | $44.38 | +9.58% | 11.5B | 6.75 | $6.57 | N/A |
| SRUUF | $17.25 | +1.83% | 4.7B | -3.74 | -$4.61 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.93% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PALAF | $4.81 | +11.93% | 1.9B | -120.32 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.22 | +13.64% | 1.7B | 22.00 | $0.01 | +0.17% |
| YLLXF | $7.16 | +5.61% | 1.6B | 9.41 | $0.76 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $1.02 | +18.02% | 987.5M | -101.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.00 | -95.18% | 405.4M | -0.10 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BNNLF | $2.03 | +15.71% | 362.2M | -101.25 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FCUUF vs NATKY Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NATKY trades at $44.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NATKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs SRUUF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRUUF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs PALAD Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs PALAF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PALAF trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -120.32. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs CGNMF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CGNMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs YLLXF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while YLLXF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs DYLLF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 987.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while DYLLF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -101.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs EGRAF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 405.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs BNNLF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BNNLF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -101.25. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ISENF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs EGRAY Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs BKLRF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKLRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs SASKF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SASKF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ANLDF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ANLDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs FUUFF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FUUFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs MGAFF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MGAFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs AUEEF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AUEEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs FISOF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ELVUF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ELVUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs PENMF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PENMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs GVXXF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while GVXXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs SRSIF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SRSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs LURAF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs WSTRF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while WSTRF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs NTELF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ADRLF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ADRLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -23.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs JTCMF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while JTCMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs KVLQF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while KVLQF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs CKEFF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs BKUCF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +7.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs BSENF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while BSENF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs MMTLF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while MMTLF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs PTUUF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while PTUUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs APAAF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while APAAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs NVTQF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NVTQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs AZURF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while AZURF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ALXEF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs STTDF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, STTDF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while STTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas STTDF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STTDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to STTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs SUUFF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while SUUFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs NRUNF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 221.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while NRUNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs XEPRF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while XEPRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.
FCUUF vs ENCUF Comparison
FCUUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCUUF stands at 433M. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCUUF is priced at $0.50, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -50.42, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCUUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCUUF is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCUUF.