Fabled Silver Gold Corp.
Fabled Silver Gold Corp. FBSGF Peers
See (FBSGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBSGF | $0.10 | +999900.00% | 15.6B | -1.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.02 | +150.00% | 125.1B | 0.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $15.78 | +4.50% | 11.6B | 83.05 | $0.19 | +4.71% |
| ANGPY | $6.57 | -4.78% | 10.4B | 26.28 | $0.25 | +0.54% |
| IMPUY | $7.30 | -3.70% | 6.5B | -6.89 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $6.50 | -18.24% | 5.8B | -6.13 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| OICT | $9.90 | -0.50% | 5.4B | -33.79 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | N/A | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| GMINF | $14.47 | +2.55% | 3.3B | 27.83 | $0.52 | N/A |
| JINFF | $7.62 | -0.68% | 3B | 17.31 | $0.44 | +1.05% |
Stock Comparison
FBSGF vs AUXIF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while AUXIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs FNLPF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while FNLPF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 83.05. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ANGPY Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ANGPY trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs IMPUY Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while IMPUY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs IMPUF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while IMPUF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs OICT Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while OICT trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -33.79. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs NMPNF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GMINF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GMINF trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs JINFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while JINFF trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs POYYF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs AUCOY Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ZMPLF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ZMPLF trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GLGDF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 464.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GLGDF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ABBRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 376.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ABBRF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -26.18. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TPRFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TIHRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TIHRF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GOTRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GOTRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SAPLF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 210.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SAPLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BRVMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BRVMF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -86.30. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs XANAF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs IAUFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while IAUFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BOCOF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BOCOF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PAASF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PAASF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs CTNXF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SLVTF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SLVTF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -25.55. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs LNXGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LNXGF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while LNXGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LNXGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to LNXGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is less volatile compared to LNXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SDRC Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SDRC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -249.90. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ARRKF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 82.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ARRKF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BKRRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BKRRF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs LUCRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while LUCRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PLLHF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs INMNF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PDLMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PDLMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ACRG Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ACRG trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TSORF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TSORF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ORVMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ORVMF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs MERG Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while MERG trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -16.99. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SSVFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SSVFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -17.49. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs OCGSF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while OCGSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs DNCVF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while DNCVF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs EMPYF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while EMPYF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 45.39. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs FREDF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while FREDF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs CHPGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while CHPGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -25.68. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SMDRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SMDRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -22.72. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PDIV Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PDIV trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs VLMGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while VLMGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -38.86. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs DYNR Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while DYNR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs CAPTF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while CAPTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -39.16. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs HMRRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SNNGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SNNGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs FCSUF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs EQMEF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while EQMEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ACKRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ACKRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TEUTF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TEUTF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs MMNGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while MMNGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SCTSF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SCTSF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs COSRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, COSRF has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while COSRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas COSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to COSRF's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to COSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs OKPRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TLSMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs DNRSF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while DNRSF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs EMPPF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while EMPPF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BBBXF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BBBXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ADYRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GSMGF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GLDRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs WEXPF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while WEXPF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SHGDF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ELRFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ELRFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs MRZLF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while MRZLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SSVRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SSVRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs NAUFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while NAUFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs TBXXF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while TBXXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs KDKCF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while KDKCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs WAMFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while WAMFF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GMDMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs HEGLF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while HEGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SMOFF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SMOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs URVNF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PVGDF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PVGDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs CTMCF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BRGC Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BRGC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs AUCUF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs HGLD Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs AGLDF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while AGLDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs GDPHF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GDPHF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while GDPHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GDPHF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to GDPHF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to GDPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs CJIMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.19. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs AUSVF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SEKZF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs BYRG Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PNTRF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PNTRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs LGCXF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while LGCXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs SUNPF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while SUNPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ATEPF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ATEPF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs ESGLF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs PMMEF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PMMEF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while PMMEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PMMEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to PMMEF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is less volatile compared to PMMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs KGFMF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while KGFMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs FYMNF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FYMNF has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while FYMNF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FYMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to FYMNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to FYMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs MHTZF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.
FBSGF vs RKHNF Comparison
FBSGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBSGF stands at 15.6B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBSGF is priced at $0.10, while RKHNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBSGF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, FBSGF's ROE is -2.23%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBSGF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBSGF.