Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd
Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd (FATLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FATLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATLF | $24.75 | +0.00% | 839.2M | 32.57 | $0.76 | N/A |
| MNOIY | $33.00 | +0.00% | 41.7B | -45.83 | -$0.72 | +102.36% |
| ICHGF | $130.00 | -1.04% | 19.7B | 27.03 | $4.86 | +1.30% |
| ACRFF | $48.50 | -9.43% | 11.4B | 18.37 | $2.64 | +2.95% |
| ACCYY | $9.46 | -0.37% | 10.8B | 24.85 | $0.37 | +3.13% |
| WTBDY | $7.93 | -1.49% | 5.4B | 16.06 | $0.48 | +4.19% |
| WTBCF | $30.27 | -12.03% | 5.1B | 15.68 | $1.93 | +4.27% |
| MINOF | $0.78 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 19.59 | $0.04 | +2.56% |
| PNDXF | $20.07 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 16.87 | $1.19 | +2.14% |
| MNILY | $17.50 | +0.00% | 4B | 17.16 | $1.02 | +2.88% |
Stock Comparison
FATLF vs MNOIY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MNOIY has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MNOIY trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MNOIY's P/E ratio is -45.83. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNOIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MNOIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNOIY's competition here
FATLF vs ICHGF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ICHGF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ICHGF trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ICHGF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHGF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and ICHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHGF's competition here
FATLF vs ACRFF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ACRFF trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and ACRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRFF's competition here
FATLF vs ACCYY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ACCYY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check ACCYY's competition here
FATLF vs WTBDY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while WTBDY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to WTBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check WTBDY's competition here
FATLF vs WTBCF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, WTBCF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while WTBCF trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WTBCF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and WTBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTBCF's competition here
FATLF vs MINOF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MINOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MINOF's competition here
FATLF vs PNDXF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while PNDXF trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check PNDXF's competition here
FATLF vs MNILY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MNILY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MNILY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNILY's competition here
FATLF vs MAORF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MAORF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MAORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAORF's competition here
FATLF vs NHHEF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while NHHEF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and NHHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHHEF's competition here
FATLF vs SMIZF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SMIZF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SMIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMIZF's competition here
FATLF vs SHALF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SHALF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SHALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHALF's competition here
FATLF vs SHALY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SHALY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to SHALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check SHALY's competition here
FATLF vs DLTTF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while DLTTF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check DLTTF's competition here
FATLF vs HKSHY Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HKSHY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and HKSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHY's competition here
FATLF vs HKSHF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HKSHF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKSHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and HKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHF's competition here
FATLF vs CLKFF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CLKFF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to CLKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check CLKFF's competition here
FATLF vs CTYLF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CTYLF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check CTYLF's competition here
FATLF vs HOCXF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HOCXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and HOCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOCXF's competition here
FATLF vs KCKSF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while KCKSF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to KCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check KCKSF's competition here
FATLF vs AGORF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and AGORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGORF's competition here
FATLF vs SKTPP Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SKTPP trades at $203.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SKTPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTPP's competition here
FATLF vs SKTP Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SKTP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to SKTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check SKTP's competition here
FATLF vs BUHF Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while BUHF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and BUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUHF's competition here
FATLF vs CAGU Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to CAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check CAGU's competition here
FATLF vs SONDQ Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SONDQ has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SONDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SONDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SONDQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SONDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SONDQ's competition here
FATLF vs CNDL Comparison March 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and CNDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNDL's competition here