Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.

FAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT.CN stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MX.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT.CN is priced at CA$3.42, while MX.TO trades at CA$45.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.12, whereas MX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, FAT.CN's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT.CN is more volatile compared to MX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.CN.Check MX.TO's competition here

FAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT.CN stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CHE-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT.CN is priced at CA$3.42, while CHE-UN.TO trades at CA$11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.12, whereas CHE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, FAT.CN's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CHE-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT.CN is more volatile compared to CHE-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.CN.Check CHE-UN.TO's competition here

FAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT.CN stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GRA.TO has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT.CN is priced at CA$3.42, while GRA.TO trades at CA$3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.12, whereas GRA.TO's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, FAT.CN's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRA.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT.CN is more volatile compared to GRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.CN.Check GRA.TO's competition here

FAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT.CN stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ARGO.CN has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT.CN is priced at CA$3.42, while ARGO.CN trades at CA$0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.12, whereas ARGO.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FAT.CN's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARGO.CN's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT.CN is less volatile compared to ARGO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.CN.Check ARGO.CN's competition here

FAT.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT.CN stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OPC.CN has a market cap of 605.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FAT.CN is priced at CA$3.42, while OPC.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.12, whereas OPC.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT.CN's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPC.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT.CN is more volatile compared to OPC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.CN.Check OPC.CN's competition here