Multi Units Luxembourg - Lyxor MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €354.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €307.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €300.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while BBN1.F trades at €149.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check BBN1.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check BLQA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while ZPDW.DE trades at €79.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IWLE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SXR8.DE trades at €591.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SXR8.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EUNL.DE trades at €104.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EUNL.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while U1FB.DE trades at €25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check U1FB.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VUAA.DE trades at €106.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VUAA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VUSA.DE trades at €105.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VUSA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SXRZ.DE trades at €251.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VGWL.DE trades at €133.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VGWL.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while P500.DE trades at €1,100.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check P500.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while D500.DE trades at €51.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check D500.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while E500.DE trades at €49.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check E500.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XJSE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VWCE.DE trades at €135.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VWCE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VGWL.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SPPE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while AW1Q.DE trades at €18.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check A4S.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,100.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IS3N.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SPY5.DE trades at €553.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SPY5.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IBC3.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IBC3.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check CBUC.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while NQSE.DE trades at €14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check NQSE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while LYPS.DE trades at €57.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check LYPS.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while LYP2.DE trades at €317.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check LYP2.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 6TVM.DE trades at €57.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while TR1.DU trades at €93.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check TR1.DU's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check PPFB.SG's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XDWD.DE trades at €114.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XDWD.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XDWL.DE trades at €96.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XDWL.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IUSA.DE trades at €55.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IUSA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EDMU.DE trades at €10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EDMU.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check OM3L.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,171.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SXRV.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EUN5.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EQQQ.DE trades at €499.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while QDVE.DE trades at €33.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check QDVE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IUSQ.DE trades at €86.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SPPW.DE trades at €38.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SPPW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while JUHE.DE trades at €51.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check JUHE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SGAS.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SLUS.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EUNK.DE trades at €87.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EUNK.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while DWS.DE trades at €54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check DWS.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while JREU.DE trades at €55.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check JREU.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while JRUD.DE trades at €51.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check JRUD.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IQQY.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XD9U.DE trades at €162.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XD9U.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XD9D.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EGV2.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XD9E.DE trades at €130.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XD9E.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while LYYA.DE trades at €357.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check LYYA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XDEW.DE trades at €87.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XDEW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XDEE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while D5BM.DE trades at €110.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check D5BM.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while STXH.DE trades at €144.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check STXH.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XS5E.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXIC.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXS1.DE trades at €202.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXS1.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while LYP6.DE trades at €265.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check LYP6.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXSA.DE trades at €55.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXSA.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXIE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VGVF.DE trades at €107.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VGVF.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VGVE.DE trades at €103.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VGVE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check CBUE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IQQW.DE trades at €76.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IQQW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while DBXW.DE trades at €112.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check DBXW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXW1.DE trades at €55.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXW1.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XWEH.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EUNW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XZMU.DE trades at €59.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XZMU.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while VGWD.DE trades at €65.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check VGWD.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IBCF.DE trades at €134.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IBCF.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SPP1.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check DBXE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while SXR7.DE trades at €205.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check SXR7.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XMME.DE trades at €58.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XMME.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €55.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while H4ZF.DE trades at €55.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XIEE.DE trades at €79.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XIEE.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check LCUW.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check EXIC.F's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while DBXD.DE trades at €228.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check DBXD.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while XZW0.DE trades at €41.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check XZW0.DE's competition here

ESTE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ESTE.F stands at 0. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESTE.F is priced at €29.69, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ESTE.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESTE.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESTE.F is less volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESTE.F.Check TCC4.DE's competition here