Essen Speciality Films Ltd.
Essen Speciality Films Ltd. (ESFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ESFL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Miscellaneous Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESFL.NS | ₹110.25 | -4.67% | 2.7B | 28.27 | ₹3.90 | N/A |
| HAWKINCOOK.BO | ₹7,455.60 | -1.88% | 39.4B | 31.35 | ₹237.82 | +1.74% |
| MORGANITE.BO | ₹1,160.25 | -2.12% | 6.5B | 28.29 | ₹41.01 | +4.22% |
| SHISHIND.BO | ₹12.75 | -0.08% | 4.9B | 60.71 | ₹0.21 | N/A |
| PODARPIGQ.BO | ₹378.85 | -1.76% | 4B | 22.23 | ₹17.04 | N/A |
| COOLCAPS.NS | ₹28.55 | -4.19% | 3.9B | 27.45 | ₹1.04 | N/A |
| CPL.BO | ₹54.25 | -6.93% | 3.3B | 9.34 | ₹5.81 | N/A |
| SIZEMASTER.BO | ₹312.25 | -0.51% | 3.1B | 80.06 | ₹3.90 | N/A |
| DHABRIYA.BO | ₹285.95 | -4.62% | 3.1B | 11.38 | ₹25.12 | +0.24% |
| FLUIDOM.BO | ₹553.95 | -9.46% | 2.7B | 17.18 | ₹32.24 | +1.35% |
Stock Comparison
ESFL.NS vs HAWKINCOOK.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAWKINCOOK.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while HAWKINCOOK.BO trades at ₹7,455.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas HAWKINCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check HAWKINCOOK.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs MORGANITE.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MORGANITE.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while MORGANITE.BO trades at ₹1,160.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas MORGANITE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MORGANITE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to MORGANITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check MORGANITE.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SHISHIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHISHIND.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SHISHIND.BO trades at ₹12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SHISHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHISHIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHISHIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SHISHIND.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs PODARPIGQ.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PODARPIGQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while PODARPIGQ.BO trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas PODARPIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PODARPIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to PODARPIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check PODARPIGQ.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs COOLCAPS.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COOLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while COOLCAPS.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas COOLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COOLCAPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to COOLCAPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check COOLCAPS.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs CPL.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CPL.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while CPL.BO trades at ₹54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas CPL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CPL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to CPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check CPL.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SIZEMASTER.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIZEMASTER.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SIZEMASTER.BO trades at ₹312.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SIZEMASTER.BO's P/E ratio is 80.06. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to SIZEMASTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SIZEMASTER.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs DHABRIYA.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHABRIYA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while DHABRIYA.BO trades at ₹285.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas DHABRIYA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHABRIYA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to DHABRIYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check DHABRIYA.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs FLUIDOM.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLUIDOM.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while FLUIDOM.BO trades at ₹553.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas FLUIDOM.BO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FLUIDOM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to FLUIDOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check FLUIDOM.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs KISAN.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KISAN.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while KISAN.BO trades at ₹22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas KISAN.BO's P/E ratio is -74.43. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KISAN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to KISAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check KISAN.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs INDAG.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INDAG.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while INDAG.BO trades at ₹86.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas INDAG.BO's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDAG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to INDAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check INDAG.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs GRCL.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRCL.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while GRCL.NS trades at ₹379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas GRCL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.26. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to GRCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check GRCL.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs APTPACK.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APTPACK.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while APTPACK.BO trades at ₹178.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas APTPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 208.02. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APTPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to APTPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check APTPACK.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SIGNETIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIGNETIND.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SIGNETIND.BO trades at ₹71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SIGNETIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGNETIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNETIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SIGNETIND.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs KAKA.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KAKA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while KAKA.BO trades at ₹146.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas KAKA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAKA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to KAKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check KAKA.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs REXPIPES.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, REXPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while REXPIPES.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas REXPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to REXPIPES.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to REXPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check REXPIPES.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs DHPIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHPIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while DHPIND.BO trades at ₹453.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas DHPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHPIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to DHPIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check DHPIND.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs GENESIS.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GENESIS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while GENESIS.BO trades at ₹98.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas GENESIS.BO's P/E ratio is -549.89. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GENESIS.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to GENESIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check GENESIS.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs MASTER.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MASTER.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while MASTER.NS trades at ₹298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas MASTER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MASTER.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to MASTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check MASTER.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SOMICONV.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOMICONV.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SOMICONV.BO trades at ₹97.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SOMICONV.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SOMICONV.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to SOMICONV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SOMICONV.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs MITSU.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MITSU.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while MITSU.BO trades at ₹81.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas MITSU.BO's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MITSU.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to MITSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check MITSU.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs CAPPIPES.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CAPPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while CAPPIPES.BO trades at ₹7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas CAPPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check CAPPIPES.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs DURLAX.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DURLAX.NS has a market cap of 748.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while DURLAX.NS trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas DURLAX.NS's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DURLAX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to DURLAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check DURLAX.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs ALKOSIGN.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALKOSIGN.BO has a market cap of 604.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while ALKOSIGN.BO trades at ₹56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas ALKOSIGN.BO's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKOSIGN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALKOSIGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check ALKOSIGN.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs DUTRON.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DUTRON.BO has a market cap of 579.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while DUTRON.BO trades at ₹96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas DUTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DUTRON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to DUTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check DUTRON.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs IYKOTHITE.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IYKOTHITE.BO has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while IYKOTHITE.BO trades at ₹18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas IYKOTHITE.BO's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IYKOTHITE.BO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to IYKOTHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check IYKOTHITE.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs NATPLAS.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATPLAS.BO has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while NATPLAS.BO trades at ₹39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas NATPLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NATPLAS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to NATPLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check NATPLAS.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs PANKAJPO.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PANKAJPO.BO has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while PANKAJPO.BO trades at ₹61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas PANKAJPO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PANKAJPO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to PANKAJPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check PANKAJPO.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs ALFAICA.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALFAICA.BO has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while ALFAICA.BO trades at ₹80.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas ALFAICA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALFAICA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALFAICA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check ALFAICA.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs RASIELEC.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RASIELEC.BO has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while RASIELEC.BO trades at ₹10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas RASIELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RASIELEC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to RASIELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check RASIELEC.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs RAMGOPOLY.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAMGOPOLY.BO has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while RAMGOPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas RAMGOPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -210.11. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check RAMGOPOLY.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs COMMAND.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COMMAND.BO has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while COMMAND.BO trades at ₹23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas COMMAND.BO's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COMMAND.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to COMMAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check COMMAND.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SONALAD.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SONALAD.BO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SONALAD.BO trades at ₹31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SONALAD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SONALAD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to SONALAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SONALAD.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs MAHACORP.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAHACORP.BO has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while MAHACORP.BO trades at ₹0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas MAHACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAHACORP.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check MAHACORP.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs KKPLASTICK.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KKPLASTICK.BO has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while KKPLASTICK.BO trades at ₹28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas KKPLASTICK.BO's P/E ratio is 473.67. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPLASTICK.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to KKPLASTICK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check KKPLASTICK.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs VAMSHIRU.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VAMSHIRU.BO has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while VAMSHIRU.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas VAMSHIRU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VAMSHIRU.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to VAMSHIRU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check VAMSHIRU.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs KUNSTOFF.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KUNSTOFF.BO has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while KUNSTOFF.BO trades at ₹19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas KUNSTOFF.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KUNSTOFF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to KUNSTOFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check KUNSTOFF.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs POLYCON.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, POLYCON.BO has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while POLYCON.BO trades at ₹23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas POLYCON.BO's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to POLYCON.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to POLYCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check POLYCON.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs NIRAJISPAT.NS Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NIRAJISPAT.NS has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while NIRAJISPAT.NS trades at ₹185.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas NIRAJISPAT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check NIRAJISPAT.NS's competition here
ESFL.NS vs ASHISHPO.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASHISHPO.BO has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while ASHISHPO.BO trades at ₹28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas ASHISHPO.BO's P/E ratio is 130.68. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASHISHPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to ASHISHPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check ASHISHPO.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs MILESTONE.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MILESTONE.BO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while MILESTONE.BO trades at ₹18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas MILESTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MILESTONE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to MILESTONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check MILESTONE.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs ARCEEIN.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARCEEIN.BO has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while ARCEEIN.BO trades at ₹18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas ARCEEIN.BO's P/E ratio is -49.59. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCEEIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARCEEIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check ARCEEIN.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs SHGANEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHGANEL.BO has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while SHGANEL.BO trades at ₹15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas SHGANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHGANEL.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHGANEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check SHGANEL.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs NARMP.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NARMP.BO has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while NARMP.BO trades at ₹15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas NARMP.BO's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NARMP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to NARMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check NARMP.BO's competition here
ESFL.NS vs INNOCORP.BO Comparison April 2026
ESFL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESFL.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INNOCORP.BO has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESFL.NS is priced at ₹110.25, while INNOCORP.BO trades at ₹5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.27, whereas INNOCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, ESFL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INNOCORP.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESFL.NS is less volatile compared to INNOCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESFL.NS.Check INNOCORP.BO's competition here