European Metals Holdings Limited
European Metals Holdings Limited ERPNF Peers
See (ERPNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERPNF | $0.23 | -23.73% | 47.9M | -11.54 | -$0.02 | N/A |
CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
BHPLF | $25.80 | +1.97% | 130.9B | 11.52 | $2.24 | +4.85% |
RTNTF | $74.31 | N/A | 104.7B | 10.51 | $7.07 | +3.16% |
RTPPF | $59.46 | N/A | 101.1B | 8.41 | $7.07 | +6.97% |
GLNCY | $7.76 | -0.28% | 47.5B | -29.84 | -$0.26 | +2.76% |
GLCNF | $3.87 | -1.31% | 46.1B | -29.77 | -$0.13 | +2.95% |
GMBXF | $5.64 | +0.36% | 43.9B | 11.75 | $0.48 | +4.41% |
AAUKF | $29.65 | +1.72% | 40.9B | -10.33 | -$2.87 | +2.14% |
FSUMF | $10.61 | +1.05% | 32.6B | 8.42 | $1.26 | +8.63% |
Stock Comparison
ERPNF vs CHZQ Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs BHPLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BHPLF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs RTNTF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while RTNTF trades at $74.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs RTPPF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while RTPPF trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs GLNCY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while GLNCY trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs GLCNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while GLCNF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs GMBXF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while GMBXF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AAUKF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AAUKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs FSUMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FSUMF trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs FSUGY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FSUGY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs NGLOY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while NGLOY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs CNSUF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and CNSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs CMCLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CMCLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs TCKRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs JXMNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs IVPAF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while IVPAF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs IPOAF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while IPOAF trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs BOLIF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs BDNNY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BDNNY trades at $63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs SHTLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ABML Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs STMNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs SMMYY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while SMMYY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs LYSDY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while LYSDY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 139.25. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs LYSCF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while LYSCF trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 138.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PUTKF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs PUTKY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PUTKY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs NILSY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs PAEKY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs MLYF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MALRY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MALRY trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MALRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs FLMMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PILBF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PILBF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -92.11. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs NGXXF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while NGXXF trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PWCRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs IPGDF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while IPGDF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs PTNDY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs MIMTF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PTNDF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs IIDDY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs NICMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs AZZVF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs AFBOF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs DWMNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs SOUHY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while SOUHY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ERMAF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ERMAY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs DETRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while DETRF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs ADTLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ADTLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs LINRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.29. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AZRMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs ADMLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ADMLF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AUSDF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs BQSSF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BQSSF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -65.35. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ILKAY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ILKAY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs ILKAF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ILKAF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs FMCXF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FMCXF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -60.25. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MFRVF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 967.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MFRVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs STTSY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ATUSF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 911.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ATUSF trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs TAOFF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while TAOFF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs GERFF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 835.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AFMJF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 800.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AFMJF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AMVMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AMVMF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.89. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs ALMTF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ALMTF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs VULNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 626.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while VULNF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs CTJHF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PXMFF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MJDLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MJDLF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs TTNNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs OSTTF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PKREF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MCRZF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MCHHF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs FGOVF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 441.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FGOVF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -83.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs BIRNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs BELMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs NQMIY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs MNXMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.13. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs AUMTF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs REEMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while REEMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs CTJHY Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs KMRPF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs PMETF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while PMETF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -66.59. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MLYCF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and MLYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs FWEDF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 318.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while FWEDF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and FWEDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs MLXEF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs CREQF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs SVMLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ERLFF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ERLFF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and ERLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs CGMLF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 291.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while CGMLF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs BSSMF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ERPNF vs SLGGF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ARAFF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs MGMNF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while MGMNF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs LTSRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs LRSRF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.
ERPNF vs ERDCF Comparison
ERPNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERPNF stands at 47.9M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERPNF is priced at $0.23, while ERDCF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERPNF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.54, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -70.96. In terms of profitability, ERPNF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERPNF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERPNF.