Ero Copper Corp.

ERO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SCCO has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO is priced at $29.68, while SCCO trades at $194.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SCCO's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, ERO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCCO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO is less volatile compared to SCCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.Check SCCO's competition here

ERO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FCX has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO is priced at $29.68, while FCX trades at $62.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FCX's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, ERO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO is more volatile compared to FCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.Check FCX's competition here

ERO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HBM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO is priced at $29.68, while HBM trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HBM's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ERO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO is more volatile compared to HBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.Check HBM's competition here

ERO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TGB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO is priced at $29.68, while TGB trades at $7.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TGB's P/E ratio is -56.93. In terms of profitability, ERO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO is less volatile compared to TGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.Check TGB's competition here

ERO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MTAL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO is priced at $29.68, while MTAL trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MTAL's P/E ratio is -23.94. In terms of profitability, ERO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO is more volatile compared to MTAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.Check MTAL's competition here