ERecord Management, Inc.
ERecord Management, Inc. (ERMG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERMG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERMG | $0.00 | +0.00% | 22.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KYCCF | $380.00 | +5.17% | 92.2B | 34.48 | $11.02 | +0.66% |
| HNHPF | $11.92 | +2.32% | 83.1B | 14.60 | $0.82 | +2.34% |
| VEMLY | $49.16 | -1.29% | 71.4B | 14.99 | $3.28 | +5.95% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | +0.00% | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +5.99% |
| HXGBY | $10.95 | -0.18% | 29.8B | 27.29 | $0.40 | +1.40% |
| HXGBF | $11.50 | +0.00% | 29.6B | 28.75 | $0.40 | +1.38% |
| MRAAY | $7.57 | +2.02% | 28.6B | 19.44 | $0.39 | +1.38% |
| MRAAF | $15.48 | +11.21% | 28.6B | 19.59 | $0.79 | +2.50% |
| TTDKY | $13.00 | +5.86% | 24.1B | 21.53 | $0.59 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
ERMG vs KYCCF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check KYCCF's competition here
ERMG vs HNHPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HNHPF's competition here
ERMG vs VEMLY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and VEMLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEMLY's competition here
ERMG vs HNHAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and HNHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNHAF's competition here
ERMG vs HXGBY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HXGBY's competition here
ERMG vs HXGBF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and HXGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXGBF's competition here
ERMG vs MRAAY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check MRAAY's competition here
ERMG vs MRAAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check MRAAF's competition here
ERMG vs TTDKY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TTDKY's competition here
ERMG vs TTDKF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TTDKF's competition here
ERMG vs SNPTF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SNPTF's competition here
ERMG vs SOTGY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $91.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SOTGY's competition here
ERMG vs BYDIF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and BYDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYDIF's competition here
ERMG vs BYDIY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $206.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check BYDIY's competition here
ERMG vs SHMZF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SHMZF's competition here
ERMG vs MNBEY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and MNBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNBEY's competition here
ERMG vs IBIDF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and IBIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IBIDF's competition here
ERMG vs MNBEF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check MNBEF's competition here
ERMG vs SEPJY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SEPJY's competition here
ERMG vs OMRNY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check OMRNY's competition here
ERMG vs SEPJF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and SEPJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEPJF's competition here
ERMG vs HROEY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HROEY's competition here
ERMG vs HRSEF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $116.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HRSEF's competition here
ERMG vs HPHTF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and HPHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPHTF's competition here
ERMG vs HPHTY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HPHTY's competition here
ERMG vs AUOTY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check AUOTY's competition here
ERMG vs RNSHF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check RNSHF's competition here
ERMG vs VEMLF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check VEMLF's competition here
ERMG vs HRIBF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HRIBF's competition here
ERMG vs TYOYY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $75.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 175.92. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TYOYY's competition here
ERMG vs FITGF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and FITGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FITGF's competition here
ERMG vs APELY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to APELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and APELY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APELY's competition here
ERMG vs TOPCF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 657.33. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TOPCF's competition here
ERMG vs APELF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to APELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and APELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APELF's competition here
ERMG vs NPEGF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -46.10. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check NPEGF's competition here
ERMG vs CODAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check CODAF's competition here
ERMG vs KGBLY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check KGBLY's competition here
ERMG vs AMANF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check AMANF's competition here
ERMG vs VAIAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check VAIAF's competition here
ERMG vs AITUF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check AITUF's competition here
ERMG vs NILRF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and NILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILRF's competition here
ERMG vs JELLF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check JELLF's competition here
ERMG vs BCNAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check BCNAF's competition here
ERMG vs JNPKF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and JNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JNPKF's competition here
ERMG vs CAZGF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -141.67. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check CAZGF's competition here
ERMG vs JPAVF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check JPAVF's competition here
ERMG vs ASAAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ASAAF's competition here
ERMG vs KRKNF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 749.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check KRKNF's competition here
ERMG vs VARXF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 651.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check VARXF's competition here
ERMG vs HNMUF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 567.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check HNMUF's competition here
ERMG vs JNNDF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 562.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check JNNDF's competition here
ERMG vs JPDYY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and JPDYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPDYY's competition here
ERMG vs KACPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check KACPF's competition here
ERMG vs TRUHF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TRUHF's competition here
ERMG vs BCNAY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and BCNAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCNAY's competition here
ERMG vs AUDGF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 326M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and AUDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUDGF's competition here
ERMG vs NNFTF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check NNFTF's competition here
ERMG vs TTGPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and TTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTGPF's competition here
ERMG vs CHAEF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check CHAEF's competition here
ERMG vs NPTSF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check NPTSF's competition here
ERMG vs FUBAF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and FUBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUBAF's competition here
ERMG vs SMOPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and SMOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMOPF's competition here
ERMG vs ENMPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and ENMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENMPF's competition here
ERMG vs HUDLF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and HUDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUDLF's competition here
ERMG vs IACYF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check IACYF's competition here
ERMG vs ENMPY Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ENMPY's competition here
ERMG vs IKGPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and IKGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IKGPF's competition here
ERMG vs ACFN Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ACFN's competition here
ERMG vs SDIIF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SDIIF's competition here
ERMG vs SILLF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and SILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SILLF's competition here
ERMG vs MPAD Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check MPAD's competition here
ERMG vs AATC Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check AATC's competition here
ERMG vs IEHC Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and IEHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IEHC's competition here
ERMG vs WELX Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check WELX's competition here
ERMG vs YNVYF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check YNVYF's competition here
ERMG vs NSCIF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check NSCIF's competition here
ERMG vs VPIM Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check VPIM's competition here
ERMG vs INRD Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check INRD's competition here
ERMG vs ROBOF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ROBOF's competition here
ERMG vs KESPF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and KESPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KESPF's competition here
ERMG vs FGRRF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check FGRRF's competition here
ERMG vs BNSOF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check BNSOF's competition here
ERMG vs AAIRF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check AAIRF's competition here
ERMG vs LCTC Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG and LCTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCTC's competition here
ERMG vs ZTSTF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ZTSTF's competition here
ERMG vs GNCLF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check GNCLF's competition here
ERMG vs SIGL Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -16.06. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SIGL's competition here
ERMG vs ESHSF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check ESHSF's competition here
ERMG vs SCND Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SCND's competition here
ERMG vs DPLS Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check DPLS's competition here
ERMG vs TNLX Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TNLX's competition here
ERMG vs RMTD Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check RMTD's competition here
ERMG vs MRRYF Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check MRRYF's competition here
ERMG vs VPER Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check VPER's competition here
ERMG vs UCLE Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while UCLE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check UCLE's competition here
ERMG vs TRCK Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check TRCK's competition here
ERMG vs SRMX Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check SRMX's competition here
ERMG vs EQTL Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while EQTL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check EQTL's competition here
ERMG vs LBAS Comparison August 2025
ERMG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMG stands at 22.6M. In comparison, LBAS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMG is priced at $0.00, while LBAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBAS's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ERMG's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LBAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMG is less volatile compared to LBAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMG.Check LBAS's competition here