Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Equitable Holdings, Inc. EQH-PA Peers
See (EQH-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQH-PA | $20.14 | -0.25% | 6.12B | 5.30 | $3.80 | +1.78% |
| BRK-B | $514.18 | +0.09% | 1.11T | 13.70 | $37.52 | N/A |
| BRK-A | $770,622.56 | -0.05% | 1.11T | 13.70 | $56,261.89 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.45B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +1.93% |
| AEH | $25.67 | N/A | 52.47B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | N/A | 52.17B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.13B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $83.47 | +1.29% | 48.11B | 20.36 | $4.10 | +1.93% |
| HIG | $128.64 | +0.88% | 36.55B | 12.83 | $10.03 | +1.55% |
| HIG-PG | $24.86 | -0.04% | 36.21B | 3.41 | $7.30 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
EQH-PA vs BRK-B Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while BRK-B trades at $514.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs BRK-A Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while BRK-A trades at $770,622.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AIG-PA Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.45B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AEH Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AED Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AEB Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.13B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AIG Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 48.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AIG trades at $83.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs HIG Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while HIG trades at $128.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs HIG-PG Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 36.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while HIG-PG trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ACGL Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ACGL trades at $94.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ACGLO Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 35.19B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ACGLO trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs SLF Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 32.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while SLF trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.79B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs PFG Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while PFG trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs EQH Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while EQH trades at $53.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ACGLP Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs BNT Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while BNT trades at $58.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs UNMA Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 14.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while UNMA trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AEG Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AEG trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AEG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs AIZN Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 9.98B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while AIZN trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ORI Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ORI trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ACGLN Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ACGLN trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH-PC Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH-PC trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH-PE Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH-PE trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ESGRP Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ESGRP trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs EQH-PC Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while EQH-PC trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ESGRO Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ESGRO trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ESGR Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ESGR trades at $335.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH-PA Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH-PA trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs YB Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while YB trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 67.36. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to YB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs GSHD Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while GSHD trades at $105.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 87.85. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to GSHD's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH-PB Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH-PB trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs CNO-PA Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while CNO-PA trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ATH-PD Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ATH-PD trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs FIHL Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while FIHL trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs RZC Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while RZC trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs IGIC Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while IGIC trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs ARGD Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 702.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while ARGD trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs WDH Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 47.20M. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while WDH trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs FGF Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 21.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while FGF trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.
EQH-PA vs FGFPP Comparison
EQH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQH-PA stands at 6.12B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 21.27M. Regarding current trading prices, EQH-PA is priced at $20.14, while FGFPP trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, EQH-PA's ROE is +0.57%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQH-PA is more volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQH-PA.