Epiroc AB (publ)
Epiroc AB (publ) EPIAF Peers
See (EPIAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIAF | $23.27 | +3.01% | 26.9B | 30.23 | $0.77 | +0.83% |
| DTRUY | $21.49 | +0.85% | 66.6B | 10.33 | $2.08 | +4.95% |
| VOLAF | $29.78 | N/A | 60.4B | 12.46 | $2.39 | +6.34% |
| VLVLY | $27.45 | +0.33% | 56.4B | 11.58 | $2.37 | +6.74% |
| VOLVF | $27.43 | -1.05% | 55.8B | 11.57 | $2.37 | +6.88% |
| DTGHF | $42.48 | +0.50% | 32.3B | 10.41 | $4.08 | +4.65% |
| KMTUF | $31.40 | +2.92% | 29B | 9.54 | $3.29 | +3.91% |
| KMTUY | $31.14 | +2.98% | 28.7B | 9.38 | $3.32 | N/A |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | N/A | 25.3B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +0.81% |
| EPIPF | $15.90 | N/A | 21.1B | 20.65 | $0.77 | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
EPIAF vs DTRUY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while DTRUY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs VOLAF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while VOLAF trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs VLVLY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while VLVLY trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs VOLVF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while VOLVF trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs DTGHF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while DTGHF trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KMTUF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KMTUF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KMTUY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KMTUY trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs EPOKY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs EPIPF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs OUKPY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while OUKPY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs TRATF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while TRATF trades at $33.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KUBTF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KUBTF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs ZLIOF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs OUKPF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs ZLIOY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while ZLIOY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs SHKLF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs SHKLY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while SHKLY trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KIGRY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KIGRY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs HTCMY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KNCRF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KNCRF trades at $78.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KNCRY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KNCRY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KNNGF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KNNGF trades at $45.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs HTCMF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs KUBTY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while KUBTY trades at $55.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs SNYYF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while SNYYF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs WKRCF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while WKRCF trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs FIRRF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs PLFRF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while PLFRF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs LKHLY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs PLFRY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs LONKF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while LONKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs AGGZF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while AGGZF trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -18.97. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs FIRRY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs AUSTF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs TGHLF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 176.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while TGHLF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs QGLHF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs PLPKF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs BIIAF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs FBRKF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs CLEV Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while CLEV trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs GWPD Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs CUBXF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while CUBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs AMMX Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while AMMX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs AIFM Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 693K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while AIFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs WWTIF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 542K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs GRSO Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs CYLC Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 164.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs CLGPF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs ZEVY Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs OSRS Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs BWOWF Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs GRNH Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.
EPIAF vs GRAZ Comparison
EPIAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPIAF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPIAF is priced at $23.27, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPIAF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.23, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPIAF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPIAF is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPIAF.