E.ON SE
E.ON SE EONGY Peers
See (EONGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EONGY | $17.10 | -0.44% | 44.67B | 8.81 | $1.94 | +3.30% |
| IBDSF | $17.90 | +2.70% | 111.70B | 25.94 | $0.69 | +2.90% |
| IBDRY | $70.43 | +0.21% | 109.87B | 25.43 | $2.77 | +2.84% |
| ESOCF | $8.88 | +0.34% | 90.17B | 12.00 | $0.74 | +5.80% |
| ENLAY | $8.85 | +0.91% | 89.87B | 11.80 | $0.75 | +4.70% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69.00B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.79B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | N/A | 53.61B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | N/A | 53.15B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| ENGQF | $20.75 | -3.91% | 50.32B | 11.21 | $1.85 | +9.04% |
Stock Comparison
EONGY vs IBDSF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 111.70B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while IBDSF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs IBDRY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 109.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while IBDRY trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ESOCF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 90.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ESOCF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ENLAY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 89.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ENLAY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs PPWLM Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs PPWLO Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.79B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ECIFF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.61B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ECIFY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.15B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ENGQF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 50.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ENGQF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ENGIY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 49.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ENGIY trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ENAKF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 44.58B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ENAKF trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs RWNFF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 28.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while RWNFF trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs RWEOY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 26.74B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while RWEOY trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs SSEZY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 25.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while SSEZY trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs SSEZF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 24.95B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while SSEZF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs EDPFY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while EDPFY trades at $38.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ELCPF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ELCPF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CHUEF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CHUEF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs AEMMF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs AEMMY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while AEMMY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CDUUF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CDUAF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CDUAF trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CUTLF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CUTLF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CNAUF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CNAUF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CDUTF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CNUTF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs HRASF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while HRASF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ACEJF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ACLLF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ACLLF trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ACLTF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ACLTF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs IRDEF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while IRDEF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CSGEF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs IRDEY Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs VETTF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while VETTF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs GLVNF Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.42M. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs PBEV Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5110.00. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs CMNR Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3076.00. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.
EONGY vs ARAO Comparison
EONGY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EONGY stands at 44.67B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694.00. Regarding current trading prices, EONGY is priced at $17.10, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EONGY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EONGY's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EONGY is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EONGY.