Enablence Technologies Inc.
Enablence Technologies Inc. (ENAFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENAFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENAFF | $0.40 | +0.00% | 19.2M | -0.66 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| ERIXF | $7.47 | +0.00% | 25.1B | 13.83 | $0.54 | +3.65% |
| ZTCOF | $3.65 | +14.06% | 23.8B | 15.21 | $0.24 | +2.35% |
| NOKBF | $4.37 | -1.35% | 23.5B | 16.81 | $0.26 | +3.25% |
| FXCNY | $11.51 | +0.00% | 18.8B | -44.27 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| AACAY | $5.07 | +1.43% | 6B | 24.14 | $0.21 | +0.61% |
| AACAF | $4.98 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 23.71 | $0.21 | +0.62% |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +0.51% |
| HMNKF | $42.20 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 54.81 | $0.77 | N/A |
| ETCMY | $1.03 | -2.83% | 2B | -1.72 | -$0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ENAFF vs ERIXF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ERIXF trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ERIXF's competition here
ENAFF vs ZTCOF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ZTCOF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ZTCOF's competition here
ENAFF vs NOKBF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while NOKBF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check NOKBF's competition here
ENAFF vs FXCNY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while FXCNY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check FXCNY's competition here
ENAFF vs AACAY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AACAY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AACAY's competition here
ENAFF vs AACAF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AACAF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AACAF's competition here
ENAFF vs YZOFF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check YZOFF's competition here
ENAFF vs HMNKF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while HMNKF trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check HMNKF's competition here
ENAFF vs ETCMY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ETCMY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ETCMY's competition here
ENAFF vs EUTLF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while EUTLF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check EUTLF's competition here
ENAFF vs VTKLF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VTKLF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VTKLF's competition here
ENAFF vs VTKLY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VTKLY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VTKLY's competition here
ENAFF vs FXCNF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check FXCNF's competition here
ENAFF vs ADVOF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ADVOF trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ADVOF's competition here
ENAFF vs HTCKF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to HTCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check HTCKF's competition here
ENAFF vs UBLXF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while UBLXF trades at $128.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check UBLXF's competition here
ENAFF vs OKIEY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while OKIEY trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check OKIEY's competition here
ENAFF vs EVTZF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while EVTZF trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check EVTZF's competition here
ENAFF vs EVSBY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 659.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while EVSBY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check EVSBY's competition here
ENAFF vs COBJF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 648.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while COBJF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check COBJF's competition here
ENAFF vs OKIEF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while OKIEF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check OKIEF's competition here
ENAFF vs SATOF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SATOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to SATOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check SATOF's competition here
ENAFF vs FLTCF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while FLTCF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check FLTCF's competition here
ENAFF vs PAOTF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while PAOTF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -38.74. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check PAOTF's competition here
ENAFF vs VNWTF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VNWTF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VNWTF's competition here
ENAFF vs SIMTF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while SIMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check SIMTF's competition here
ENAFF vs QTRHF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while QTRHF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check QTRHF's competition here
ENAFF vs ATSKF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ATSKF's competition here
ENAFF vs NPNZF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to NPNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check NPNZF's competition here
ENAFF vs BEWFF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while BEWFF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check BEWFF's competition here
ENAFF vs ELSLF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ELSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ELSLF's competition here
ENAFF vs WSTL Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while WSTL trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check WSTL's competition here
ENAFF vs ASROF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ASROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ASROF's competition here
ENAFF vs BYLTF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check BYLTF's competition here
ENAFF vs CYSNF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CYSNF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -69.90. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CYSNF's competition here
ENAFF vs VMNT Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VMNT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VMNT's competition here
ENAFF vs MILOF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to MILOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check MILOF's competition here
ENAFF vs KPIFF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while KPIFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check KPIFF's competition here
ENAFF vs ATGN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ATGN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ATGN's competition here
ENAFF vs MOYFF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while MOYFF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check MOYFF's competition here
ENAFF vs CYCA Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CYCA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CYCA's competition here
ENAFF vs LTCCF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to LTCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check LTCCF's competition here
ENAFF vs ISEYF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ISEYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ISEYF's competition here
ENAFF vs TTLTF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while TTLTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check TTLTF's competition here
ENAFF vs HPNN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check HPNN's competition here
ENAFF vs STRH Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check STRH's competition here
ENAFF vs WLAN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check WLAN's competition here
ENAFF vs NVRVF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while NVRVF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to NVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check NVRVF's competition here
ENAFF vs NRRWF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while NRRWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check NRRWF's competition here
ENAFF vs LMGR Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check LMGR's competition here
ENAFF vs CNTFY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CNTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CNTFY's competition here
ENAFF vs MFCO Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while MFCO trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check MFCO's competition here
ENAFF vs TPTW Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check TPTW's competition here
ENAFF vs BDRL Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 475.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while BDRL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check BDRL's competition here
ENAFF vs AXBSF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AXBSF's competition here
ENAFF vs CRMK Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 375.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CRMK's competition here
ENAFF vs BKSD Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to BKSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check BKSD's competition here
ENAFF vs MLRT Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 233.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while MLRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check MLRT's competition here
ENAFF vs ATCLF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 224.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ATCLF's competition here
ENAFF vs WGNR Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 203.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check WGNR's competition here
ENAFF vs AAPJ Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 178K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AAPJ's competition here
ENAFF vs CAMPQ Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CAMPQ's competition here
ENAFF vs VCTY Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VCTY's competition here
ENAFF vs ERFB Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ERFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ERFB's competition here
ENAFF vs PDXP Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check PDXP's competition here
ENAFF vs EZEN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ENAFF has daily volatility of 85.71 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EZEN's competition here
ENAFF vs PMOZ Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to PMOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check PMOZ's competition here
ENAFF vs CRLI Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CRLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CRLI's competition here
ENAFF vs ELST Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 49.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ELST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ELST's competition here
ENAFF vs IPTK Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check IPTK's competition here
ENAFF vs ETCIA Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ETCIA's competition here
ENAFF vs LTTC Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check LTTC's competition here
ENAFF vs FBCE Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check FBCE's competition here
ENAFF vs OTOW Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to OTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check OTOW's competition here
ENAFF vs UTRK Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check UTRK's competition here
ENAFF vs JUMT Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check JUMT's competition here
ENAFF vs AVSR Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to AVSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AVSR's competition here
ENAFF vs MPEG Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check MPEG's competition here
ENAFF vs WIRX Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check WIRX's competition here
ENAFF vs CYBD Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to CYBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check CYBD's competition here
ENAFF vs VRCM Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check VRCM's competition here
ENAFF vs IZNN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check IZNN's competition here
ENAFF vs PRXM Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to PRXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check PRXM's competition here
ENAFF vs RPDT Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check RPDT's competition here
ENAFF vs XCOMQ Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check XCOMQ's competition here
ENAFF vs RITT Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check RITT's competition here
ENAFF vs ZSTN Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ZSTN's competition here
ENAFF vs ABILF Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ABILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ABILF's competition here
ENAFF vs TCCO Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 371. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to TCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check TCCO's competition here
ENAFF vs GNRD Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to GNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check GNRD's competition here
ENAFF vs ZTNO Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ZTNO's competition here
ENAFF vs ORSX Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check ORSX's competition here
ENAFF vs HDIH Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to HDIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check HDIH's competition here
ENAFF vs LMSC Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to LMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check LMSC's competition here
ENAFF vs STCI Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to STCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check STCI's competition here
ENAFF vs BETW Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check BETW's competition here
ENAFF vs DGIV Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check DGIV's competition here
ENAFF vs AXCP Comparison July 2025
ENAFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENAFF stands at 19.2M. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENAFF is priced at $0.40, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENAFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENAFF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENAFF is more volatile compared to AXCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENAFF.Check AXCP's competition here