Eimco Elecon (India) Limited
Eimco Elecon (India) Limited (EIMCOELECO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EIMCOELECO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIMCOELECO.NS | ₹1,637.30 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 19.68 | ₹81.87 | +0.31% |
| ASHOKLEY.NS | ₹203.49 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 37.03 | ₹5.64 | +1.50% |
| ASHOKLEY.BO | ₹203.15 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 37.69 | ₹5.54 | +1.50% |
| ESCORTS.BO | ₹3,460.65 | +0.00% | 376.8B | 30.21 | ₹113.38 | +1.05% |
| ESCORTS.NS | ₹3,460.50 | +0.00% | 376B | 28.51 | ₹119.90 | +1.05% |
| ACE.BO | ₹876.45 | +0.00% | 102.9B | 24.35 | ₹35.52 | +0.23% |
| ACE.NS | ₹877.15 | +0.00% | 102.8B | 24.35 | ₹35.49 | +0.23% |
| OLECTRA.BO | ₹1,011.90 | +0.00% | 83.3B | 58.16 | ₹17.46 | +0.04% |
| HMT.BO | ₹45.71 | +0.00% | 57.8B | -11.11 | -₹4.32 | N/A |
| HMT.NS | ₹45.51 | +0.00% | 57.5B | -13.09 | -₹3.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ASHOKLEY.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ASHOKLEY.NS trades at ₹203.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ASHOKLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHOKLEY.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ASHOKLEY.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ASHOKLEY.BO trades at ₹203.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ASHOKLEY.BO's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHOKLEY.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ESCORTS.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ESCORTS.BO has a market cap of 376.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ESCORTS.BO trades at ₹3,460.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ESCORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESCORTS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ESCORTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ESCORTS.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ESCORTS.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ESCORTS.NS has a market cap of 376B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ESCORTS.NS trades at ₹3,460.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ESCORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESCORTS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ESCORTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ESCORTS.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ACE.BO trades at ₹876.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while ACE.NS trades at ₹877.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs OLECTRA.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OLECTRA.BO has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while OLECTRA.BO trades at ₹1,011.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas OLECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to OLECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check OLECTRA.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while HMT.BO trades at ₹45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while HMT.NS trades at ₹45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹483.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹483.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs VSTTILLERS.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.NS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while VSTTILLERS.NS trades at ₹6,156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas VSTTILLERS.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSTTILLERS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs VSTTILLERS.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.BO has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while VSTTILLERS.BO trades at ₹6,174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas VSTTILLERS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSTTILLERS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs RMDRIP.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RMDRIP.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while RMDRIP.NS trades at ₹119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas RMDRIP.NS's P/E ratio is 82.99. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMDRIP.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is more volatile compared to RMDRIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check RMDRIP.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is 96.79. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is 96.38. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs JISLJALEQS.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while JISLJALEQS.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas JISLJALEQS.BO's P/E ratio is 149.79. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JISLJALEQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs JISLJALEQS.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while JISLJALEQS.NS trades at ₹35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas JISLJALEQS.NS's P/E ratio is 149.54. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JISLJALEQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs UNIPARTS.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while UNIPARTS.BO trades at ₹482.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas UNIPARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIPARTS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to UNIPARTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check UNIPARTS.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs UNIPARTS.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while UNIPARTS.NS trades at ₹481.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas UNIPARTS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIPARTS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to UNIPARTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check UNIPARTS.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs TIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TIL.NS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while TIL.NS trades at ₹254.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas TIL.NS's P/E ratio is -212.06. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIL.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to TIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check TIL.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs TIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TIL.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while TIL.BO trades at ₹255.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas TIL.BO's P/E ratio is -212.61. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to TIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check TIL.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs EIMCOELECO.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while EIMCOELECO.BO trades at ₹1,641.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas EIMCOELECO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIMCOELECO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs BAJAJINDEF.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BAJAJINDEF.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while BAJAJINDEF.NS trades at ₹260.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas BAJAJINDEF.NS's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check BAJAJINDEF.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs BLAL.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLAL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while BLAL.NS trades at ₹188.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas BLAL.NS's P/E ratio is -186.87. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLAL.NS's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to BLAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check BLAL.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs BLAL.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLAL.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while BLAL.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas BLAL.BO's P/E ratio is -187.85. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLAL.BO's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to BLAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check BLAL.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs INDOFARM.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, INDOFARM.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while INDOFARM.NS trades at ₹143.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas INDOFARM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDOFARM.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to INDOFARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check INDOFARM.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs REVATHI.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, REVATHI.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while REVATHI.NS trades at ₹1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas REVATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REVATHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to REVATHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check REVATHI.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs TARACHAND.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TARACHAND.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while TARACHAND.NS trades at ₹65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas TARACHAND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TARACHAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to TARACHAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check TARACHAND.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs MAHEPC.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MAHEPC.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while MAHEPC.NS trades at ₹126.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas MAHEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHEPC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to MAHEPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check MAHEPC.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs MAHEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MAHEPC.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while MAHEPC.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas MAHEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHEPC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to MAHEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check MAHEPC.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs RVTH.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RVTH.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while RVTH.NS trades at ₹633.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas RVTH.NS's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVTH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to RVTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check RVTH.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs SEMAC.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SEMAC.NS has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while SEMAC.NS trades at ₹268.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas SEMAC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEMAC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to SEMAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check SEMAC.NS's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs SEMAC.BO Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SEMAC.BO has a market cap of 810.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while SEMAC.BO trades at ₹268.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas SEMAC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEMAC.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to SEMAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check SEMAC.BO's competition here
EIMCOELECO.NS vs DIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EIMCOELECO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EIMCOELECO.NS stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DIL.NS has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EIMCOELECO.NS is priced at ₹1,637.30, while DIL.NS trades at ₹1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EIMCOELECO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.68, whereas DIL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIL.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EIMCOELECO.NS is less volatile compared to DIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EIMCOELECO.NS.Check DIL.NS's competition here