Energy Fuels Inc.
Energy Fuels Inc. EFR.TO Peers
See (EFR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFR.TO | CA$8.54 | +0.00% | 1.8B | -14.03 | -CA$0.59 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$97.40 | +0.00% | 43.2B | 173.96 | CA$0.57 | +0.16% |
| U-UN.TO | CA$24.79 | +0.00% | 6.7B | -3.76 | -CA$6.33 | N/A |
| NXE.TO | CA$9.21 | +0.00% | 5.3B | -54.41 | -CA$0.17 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$2.46 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -18.88 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$1.46 | +0.00% | 529M | -8.06 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$3.43 | +0.00% | 450.4M | 84.25 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | CA$0.28 | +0.00% | 104.4M | -5.55 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
| LUR.CN | CA$0.24 | +2.13% | 55.5M | -0.75 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EFR.TO vs CCO.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while CCO.TO trades at CA$97.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 173.96. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs U-UN.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, U-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while U-UN.TO trades at CA$24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas U-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to U-UN.TO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to U-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs NXE.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while NXE.TO trades at CA$9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -54.41. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs DML.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while DML.TO trades at CA$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -18.88. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs FCU.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs URE.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while URE.TO trades at CA$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs URC.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 450.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while URC.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 84.25. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs MGA.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while MGA.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs LUR.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs WUC.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs CAKE.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs API.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, API.CN has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while API.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas API.CN's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to API.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to API.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs GREN.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while GREN.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to GREN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs OBRN.CN Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.
EFR.TO vs AZZ.TO Comparison
EFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFR.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EFR.TO is priced at CA$8.54, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.03, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, EFR.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFR.TO is more volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFR.TO.