Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, HPS-A.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while HPS-A.TO trades at CA$235.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas HPS-A.TO's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to HPS-A.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is less volatile compared to HPS-A.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check HPS-A.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, BLDP.TO has a market cap of 967.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while BLDP.TO trades at CA$3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas BLDP.TO's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to BLDP.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to BLDP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check BLDP.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, ELVA.TO has a market cap of 455M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while ELVA.TO trades at CA$9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas ELVA.TO's P/E ratio is 66.20. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to ELVA.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to ELVA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check ELVA.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, HMM-A.TO has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while HMM-A.TO trades at CA$22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas HMM-A.TO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to HMM-A.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to HMM-A.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check HMM-A.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, GRID.TO has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while GRID.TO trades at CA$3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas GRID.TO's P/E ratio is -149.16. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to GRID.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to GRID.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check GRID.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, HEAT.CN has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while HEAT.CN trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas HEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to HEAT.CN's ROE of +2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is less volatile compared to HEAT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check HEAT.CN's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, EXRO.TO has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while EXRO.TO trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas EXRO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to EXRO.TO's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to EXRO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check EXRO.TO's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, ZAIR.CN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while ZAIR.CN trades at CA$0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas ZAIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to ZAIR.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is not fully comparable compared to ZAIR.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check ZAIR.CN's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, PRTI.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while PRTI.CN trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas PRTI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to PRTI.CN's ROE of -13.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to PRTI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check PRTI.CN's competition here

Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL.TO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL.TO stands at 161.6M. In comparison, LPEN.TO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL.TO is priced at CA$0.98 on the TSX, while LPEN.TO trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -32.67, whereas LPEN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EFL.TO's ROE is +2.29%, compared to LPEN.TO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL.TO is more volatile compared to LPEN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.TO.Check LPEN.TO's competition here