Endeavour Silver Corp.
Endeavour Silver Corp. (EDR.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EDR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDR.TO | CA$14.71 | -2.97% | 4.4B | -25.81 | -CA$0.57 | N/A |
| GMIN.TO | CA$52.09 | -3.25% | 11.9B | 33.82 | CA$1.54 | N/A |
| CGG.TO | CA$29.23 | -4.16% | 11.6B | 20.88 | CA$1.40 | +0.38% |
| TFPM.TO | CA$51.12 | -1.45% | 10.6B | 31.95 | CA$1.60 | +0.61% |
| ARIS.TO | CA$26.20 | -1.84% | 5.4B | 70.78 | CA$0.37 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | CA$42.68 | -2.47% | 5.2B | -59.28 | -CA$0.72 | N/A |
| SIL.TO | CA$15.01 | -8.64% | 2.2B | 18.30 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| ABRA.TO | CA$13.62 | -4.08% | 2.2B | -37.83 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | CA$12.41 | -3.35% | 2.1B | -25.33 | -CA$0.49 | N/A |
| MUX.TO | CA$33.56 | -0.86% | 2B | -108.26 | -CA$0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EDR.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GMIN.TO trades at CA$52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GMIN.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CGG.TO trades at CA$29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CGG.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while TFPM.TO trades at CA$51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check TFPM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ARIS.TO trades at CA$26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 70.78. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ARIS.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PPTA.TO trades at CA$42.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -59.28. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PPTA.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs SIL.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SIL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SIL.TO trades at CA$15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SIL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SIL.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to SIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check SIL.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ABRA.TO trades at CA$13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -37.83. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ABRA.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SLS.TO trades at CA$12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO and SLS.TO have similar daily volatility (3.51).Check SLS.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while MUX.TO trades at CA$33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -108.26. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check MUX.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ASM.TO trades at CA$10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ASM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GATO.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GATO.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GGD.TO trades at CA$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GGD.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -201.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check NUAG.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs GSKR.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GSKR.V has a market cap of 600.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GSKR.V trades at CA$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GSKR.V's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GSKR.V's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to GSKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GSKR.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while VOXR.TO trades at CA$8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -200.75. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check VOXR.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PTM.TO trades at CA$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -60.40. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PTM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ALLI.NE trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ALLI.NE's competition here
EDR.TO vs SM.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SM.V trades at CA$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -178.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SM.V's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check SM.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs KCP.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KCP.V has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while KCP.V trades at CA$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas KCP.V's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KCP.V's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to KCP.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check KCP.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ORV.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ORV.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while HSLV.CN trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check HSLV.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs WPG.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WPG.V has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while WPG.V trades at CA$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas WPG.V's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WPG.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to WPG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check WPG.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while XAM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check XAM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs OCG.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OCG.TO has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while OCG.TO trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas OCG.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OCG.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to OCG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check OCG.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs AGA.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AGA.V has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AGA.V trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AGA.V's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AGA.V's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to AGA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AGA.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while LUC.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check LUC.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs CGNT.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CGNT.V has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CGNT.V trades at CA$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CGNT.V's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CGNT.V's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to CGNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CGNT.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 99.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ELR.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ELR.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CUAU.CN trades at CA$1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -31.17. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CUAU.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs FNM.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FNM.V has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while FNM.V trades at CA$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas FNM.V's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FNM.V's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to FNM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check FNM.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while DMET.NE trades at CA$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check DMET.NE's competition here
EDR.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while EMPS.CN trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check EMPS.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs SGO.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SGO.V has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SGO.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SGO.V's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SGO.V's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to SGO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check SGO.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PAU.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PAU.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while NVRO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check NVRO.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ESAU.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ESAU.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CLCO.V trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CLCO.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AUCU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AUCU.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs ITKO.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ITKO.CN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ITKO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ITKO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ITKO.CN's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ITKO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ITKO.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CUPR.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of -19.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CUPR.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while DIAM.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check DIAM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while FTEL.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +17.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check FTEL.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs CAM.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CAM.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CAM.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while MPVD.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check MPVD.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ATHA.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ATHA.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs ELY.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ELY.V has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ELY.V trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ELY.V's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ELY.V's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to ELY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ELY.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AUAG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AUAG.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs TT.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TT.V has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while TT.V trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas TT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TT.V's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to TT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check TT.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PNGC.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PNGC.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CFE.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CFE.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs COMT.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COMT.CN has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while COMT.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas COMT.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COMT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to COMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check COMT.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ACDX.CN trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of +91.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ACDX.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while IGLD.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EDR.TO has daily volatility of 3.51 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check IGLD.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs SIZE.NE Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SIZE.NE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SIZE.NE trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SIZE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SIZE.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to SIZE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check SIZE.NE's competition here
EDR.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while MLKM.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check MLKM.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs HML.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while HML.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -18.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check HML.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AUMN.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while LECR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check LECR.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PMS.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PMS.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs KNOX.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KNOX.V has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while KNOX.V trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas KNOX.V's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KNOX.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to KNOX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check KNOX.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while CRC.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check CRC.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while WDGY.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of +2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check WDGY.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while LTHM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check LTHM.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while ORGN.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check ORGN.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs WLR.V Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WLR.V has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while WLR.V trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas WLR.V's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WLR.V's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to WLR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check WLR.V's competition here
EDR.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GLDS.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GLDS.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs RGN.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RGN.CN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while RGN.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas RGN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RGN.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to RGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check RGN.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while SAND.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check SAND.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while NVR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check NVR.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while TGLD.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check TGLD.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while TAI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check TAI.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while FABL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check FABL.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 471.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while TAUR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check TAUR.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AGE.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AGE.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while MUSK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check MUSK.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs NSR.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NSR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while NSR.TO trades at CA$9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas NSR.TO's P/E ratio is 967.00. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NSR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to NSR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check NSR.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs PFB.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PFB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while PFB.TO trades at CA$24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas PFB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PFB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to PFB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check PFB.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs FOXY.CN Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FOXY.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while FOXY.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas FOXY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FOXY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to FOXY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check FOXY.CN's competition here
EDR.TO vs GCM.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GCM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while GCM.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas GCM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GCM.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to GCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check GCM.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs XGC.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, XGC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while XGC.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas XGC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XGC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is more volatile compared to XGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check XGC.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs MMX.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MMX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while MMX.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas MMX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MMX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to MMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check MMX.TO's competition here
EDR.TO vs AXU.TO Comparison March 2026
EDR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDR.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AXU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDR.TO is priced at CA$14.71, while AXU.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -25.81, whereas AXU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, EDR.TO's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AXU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDR.TO is less volatile compared to AXU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDR.TO.Check AXU.TO's competition here