Eden Research plc
Eden Research plc (EDNSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EDNSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDNSF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 18.7M | -3.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| YARIY | $18.27 | -2.40% | 19.2B | 13.78 | $1.37 | +1.28% |
| PHOJY | $22.09 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 3.99 | $5.53 | N/A |
| YRAIF | $37.31 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 13.62 | $2.74 | +1.31% |
| BLONF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 2.8B | -0.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KPLUF | $14.85 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 1485.00 | $0.01 | +1.13% |
| TSDOF | $25.18 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 31.48 | $0.80 | +3.66% |
| SNFRY | $9.92 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 9.45 | $1.05 | +4.95% |
| CBLUF | $0.31 | +20.15% | 1.2B | 8.67 | $0.03 | +6.42% |
| SNFRF | $0.16 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 8.23 | $0.02 | +10.76% |
Stock Comparison
EDNSF vs YARIY Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while YARIY trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check YARIY's competition here
EDNSF vs PHOJY Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to PHOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check PHOJY's competition here
EDNSF vs YRAIF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while YRAIF trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to YRAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check YRAIF's competition here
EDNSF vs BLONF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while BLONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to BLONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check BLONF's competition here
EDNSF vs KPLUF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, KPLUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while KPLUF trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KPLUF's P/E ratio is 1485.00. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KPLUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to KPLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check KPLUF's competition here
EDNSF vs TSDOF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, TSDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while TSDOF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas TSDOF's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TSDOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to TSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check TSDOF's competition here
EDNSF vs SNFRY Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while SNFRY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to SNFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check SNFRY's competition here
EDNSF vs CBLUF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while CBLUF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to CBLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check CBLUF's competition here
EDNSF vs SNFRF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while SNFRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check SNFRF's competition here
EDNSF vs CBLUY Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while CBLUY trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to CBLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check CBLUY's competition here
EDNSF vs NUFMF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, NUFMF has a market cap of 632M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while NUFMF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas NUFMF's P/E ratio is -41.25. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NUFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to NUFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check NUFMF's competition here
EDNSF vs BWEL Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while BWEL trades at $519.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWEL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check BWEL's competition here
EDNSF vs MBCF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while MBCF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check MBCF's competition here
EDNSF vs DNKLY Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check DNKLY's competition here
EDNSF vs EMSNF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to EMSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check EMSNF's competition here
EDNSF vs PLHCF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to PLHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check PLHCF's competition here
EDNSF vs KNGW Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while KNGW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to KNGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check KNGW's competition here
EDNSF vs MGROF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while MGROF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to MGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check MGROF's competition here
EDNSF vs HMIFF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to HMIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check HMIFF's competition here
EDNSF vs VNPKF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while VNPKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to VNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check VNPKF's competition here
EDNSF vs FTZZF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while FTZZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check FTZZF's competition here
EDNSF vs ARLSF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while ARLSF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check ARLSF's competition here
EDNSF vs LBTD Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while LBTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check LBTD's competition here
EDNSF vs VVIVF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while VVIVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to VVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check VVIVF's competition here
EDNSF vs KRLTF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while KRLTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to KRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check KRLTF's competition here
EDNSF vs APEOF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while APEOF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to APEOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to APEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check APEOF's competition here
EDNSF vs BEVVF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while BEVVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to BEVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check BEVVF's competition here
EDNSF vs ALGWF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while ALGWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check ALGWF's competition here
EDNSF vs PTAM Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 384.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while PTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to PTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check PTAM's competition here
EDNSF vs EACTF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 289.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while EACTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to EACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check EACTF's competition here
EDNSF vs AGYP Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 194.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while AGYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to AGYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check AGYP's competition here
EDNSF vs MAAFF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check MAAFF's competition here
EDNSF vs KWBT Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while KWBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to KWBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check KWBT's competition here
EDNSF vs IGNE Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 15.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while IGNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check IGNE's competition here
EDNSF vs KGET Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while KGET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to KGET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check KGET's competition here
EDNSF vs HFGVF Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check HFGVF's competition here
EDNSF vs SLCO Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while SLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SLCO's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to SLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check SLCO's competition here
EDNSF vs BIONQ Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, BIONQ has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while BIONQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas BIONQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BIONQ's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to BIONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check BIONQ's competition here
EDNSF vs HUMT Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while HUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to HUMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check HUMT's competition here
EDNSF vs YUII Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, YUII has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while YUII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas YUII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YUII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to YUII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check YUII's competition here
EDNSF vs ITRO Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while ITRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to ITRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check ITRO's competition here
EDNSF vs NOEC Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while NOEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NOEC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check NOEC's competition here
EDNSF vs PHOS Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while PHOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PHOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to PHOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check PHOS's competition here
EDNSF vs GREN Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 443. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while GREN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GREN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check GREN's competition here
EDNSF vs USBC Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while USBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to USBC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check USBC's competition here
EDNSF vs QCCP Comparison August 2025
EDNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDNSF stands at 18.7M. In comparison, QCCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDNSF is priced at $0.04, while QCCP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDNSF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas QCCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDNSF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to QCCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDNSF is more volatile compared to QCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDNSF.Check QCCP's competition here