iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDM2.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EDM2.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM2.DE | €7.31 | -0.03% | 8.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €404.53 | +1.24% | 3.4T | 18.77 | €21.55 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €358.36 | +0.79% | 3T | 19.01 | €18.85 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €350.37 | +1.24% | 2.9T | 18.77 | €18.66 | N/A |
| WTIF.SG | €51.96 | +0.00% | 171B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZPDW.DE | €101.06 | +0.00% | 157.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UU2.DE | €915.50 | +0.00% | 143.4B | 31.04 | €29.79 | +1.98% |
| IE00BYQCZJ13.SG | €42.96 | -1.15% | 140.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €107.06 | +0.00% | 126.7B | 31.61 | €3.26 | +3.92% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
EDM2.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €404.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €358.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €350.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs WTIF.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, WTIF.SG has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while WTIF.SG trades at €51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTIF.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTIF.SG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to WTIF.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check WTIF.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while ZPDW.DE trades at €101.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs UU2.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, UU2.DE has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while UU2.DE trades at €915.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UU2.DE's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UU2.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to UU2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check UU2.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IE00BYQCZJ13.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IE00BYQCZJ13.SG has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IE00BYQCZJ13.SG trades at €42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BYQCZJ13.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BYQCZJ13.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BYQCZJ13.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IE00BYQCZJ13.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 126.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while BBN1.F trades at €107.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check BBN1.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SXR8.DE trades at €625.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EUNL.DE trades at €113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while U1FB.DE trades at €30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VUAA.DE trades at €112.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VUSA.DE trades at €110.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VGWL.DE trades at €145.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VWCE.DE trades at €149.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs D500.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while D500.DE trades at €54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check D500.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs E500.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while E500.DE trades at €52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs P500.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while P500.DE trades at €11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while A4S.DE trades at €400.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check A4S.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while PPFB.SG trades at €82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IS3N.DE trades at €42.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs AW1Q.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while AW1Q.DE trades at €22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IBC3.DE trades at €5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VGWL.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,155.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SPPE.DE trades at €16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SPY5.DE trades at €583.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IBC3.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs LYPS.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while LYPS.DE trades at €59.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 6TVM.DE trades at €59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while LYP2.DE trades at €332.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EDMU.DE trades at €10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while OM3L.DE trades at €10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XDWD.DE trades at €124.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IUSQ.DE trades at €95.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XDWL.DE trades at €102.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs NQSE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while NQSE.DE trades at €14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs DBXT.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DBXT.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while DBXT.DE trades at €148.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXT.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXT.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to DBXT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check DBXT.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,210.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while TR1.DU trades at €80.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check TR1.DU's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IUSZ.DE trades at €11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IUSA.DE trades at €58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while LYP6.DE trades at €301.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SPPW.DE trades at €41.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SLUS.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SLUS.DE trades at €11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while STXH.DE trades at €158.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EGV2.DE trades at €100.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while QDVE.DE trades at €34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EUNK.DE trades at €99.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SGAS.DE trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EQQQ.DE trades at €516.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while JUHE.DE trades at €54.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EL44.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EL44.DE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EL44.DE trades at €12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EL44.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EL44.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EL44.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EL44.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while DWS.DE trades at €59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check DWS.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs I500.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, I500.SG has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while I500.SG trades at €9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I500.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to I500.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check I500.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IQQY.DE trades at €38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while JRUD.DE trades at €54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while JREU.DE trades at €58.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs CBUG.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CBUG.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while CBUG.DE trades at €5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to CBUG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check CBUG.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XDEW.DE trades at €95.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XDEE.DE trades at €11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs H4ZJ.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, H4ZJ.SG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while H4ZJ.SG trades at €38.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check H4ZJ.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XD9E.DE trades at €137.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XD9D.DE trades at €22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XD9U.DE trades at €171.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €37.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VGVE.DE trades at €112.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VGVF.DE trades at €117.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EXSA.DE trades at €62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EXIE.DE trades at €7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XMME.DE trades at €71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while DBXW.DE trades at €121.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XWEH.DE trades at €48.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while LYYA.DE trades at €381.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SPYY.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SPYY.DE trades at €253.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SPYY.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SPP1.DE trades at €24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while D5BM.DE trades at €117.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XS5E.DE trades at €10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
EDM2.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while VGWD.DE trades at €76.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EXS1.DE trades at €207.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 2B7K.DE trades at €12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XIEE.DE trades at €88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XIEE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while 2B7J.DE trades at €9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EXW1.DE trades at €61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while XZMU.DE trades at €63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs EUNW.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while EUNW.DE trades at €93.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while IBCF.DE trades at €142.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check IBCF.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs AEMD.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while AEMD.DE trades at €66.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check AEMD.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while SXR7.DE trades at €229.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs CBUE.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
EDM2.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison February 2026
EDM2.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDM2.DE stands at 8.6B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDM2.DE is priced at €7.31, while H4ZF.DE trades at €58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDM2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDM2.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDM2.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDM2.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here