ChannelAdvisor Corporation

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 348.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SAP trades at $298.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 270.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CRM trades at $282.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 210.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while NOW trades at $1,015.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.91. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 185.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while UBER trades at $88.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 184.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while INTU trades at $659.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 61.85. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 132.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SHOP trades at $102.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 83.19. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 121.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while APP trades at $358.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 64.92. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 110.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while MSTR trades at $402.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 86.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CDNS trades at $317.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 71.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while WDAY trades at $268.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 142.08. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 62.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ADSK trades at $292.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 57.21. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SNOW trades at $179.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.40. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 55.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while TEAM trades at $209.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -126.77. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 41.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while FICO trades at $1,707.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.27. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 39.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DDOG trades at $113.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 241.89. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while TTD trades at $74.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 90.82. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 32.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while HUBS trades at $619.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1376.91. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ANSS trades at $343.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while STRK trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ZM trades at $82.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while STRF trades at $100.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while TYL trades at $566.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DUOL trades at $514.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 275.03. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PTC trades at $169.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SSNC trades at $78.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while GRAB trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 481.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while GWRE trades at $210.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1109.16. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 17.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DOCU trades at $85.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DT trades at $53.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PAYC trades at $257.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while MNDY trades at $291.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 294.85. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 13.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BSY trades at $47.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while MANH trades at $188.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 53.87. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while TTAN trades at $123.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PCTY trades at $196.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 49.01. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while NICE trades at $162.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PCOR trades at $67.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.24. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DSGX trades at $113.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.19. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ESTC trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -69.20. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DAY trades at $57.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 359.66. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while QXO trades at $17.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -48.77. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, U has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while U trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.58. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PEGA trades at $99.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 46.10. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while GTLB trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1190.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CVLT trades at $174.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 104.43. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while APPF trades at $206.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while OTEX trades at $28.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SRAD trades at $23.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 122.68. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while LYFT trades at $15.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 106.47. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CWAN trades at $22.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM and COUP have similar daily volatility (0.04).

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while VERX trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BULL trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SYT trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while IDCC trades at $214.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while QTWO trades at $87.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -256.74. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while FROG trades at $42.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.01. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while GRND trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.62. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while LIF trades at $60.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 467.73. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BILL trades at $44.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2231.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while INTA trades at $56.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -235.42. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while FRSH trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -60.46. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while RUMBW trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ASAN trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while RUM trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while WK trades at $68.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.13. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while SOUN trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ZI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BRZE trades at $34.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -33.95. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM and AYX have similar daily volatility (0.04).

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BL trades at $53.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while RIOT trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ZETA trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -52.54. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ALKT trades at $29.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -80.70. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CALX trades at $47.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -90.44. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while COMP trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BLKB trades at $62.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while NCNO trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -77.27. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while BTDR trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while GBTG trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.60. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ALIT trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -91.00. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while ALRM trades at $57.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while CLSK trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while AGYS trades at $100.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 122.18. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PAR trades at $65.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while PRGS trades at $61.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.

ECOM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECOM stands at N/A. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ECOM is priced at $23.09, while DAVE trades at $193.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECOM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 54.26. In terms of profitability, ECOM's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECOM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECOM.