Eastern Asteria, Inc.
Eastern Asteria, Inc. EATR Peers
See (EATR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATR | $0.00 | -14.29% | 2.46M | -0.02 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| HESAF | $2,808.00 | -1.47% | 294.38B | 57.20 | $49.09 | +1.06% |
| HESAY | $275.09 | -1.91% | 288.39B | 56.14 | $4.90 | +0.80% |
| LVMHF | $550.44 | -1.67% | 274.76B | 19.51 | $28.21 | +2.95% |
| LVMUY | $109.83 | -1.01% | 274.12B | 19.44 | $5.65 | +2.08% |
| CFRHF | $198.28 | -1.11% | 116.06B | 27.77 | $7.14 | +1.85% |
| CFRUY | $19.36 | -0.67% | 115.23B | 26.89 | $0.72 | +2.10% |
| CHDRY | $127.80 | -4.89% | 92.23B | 15.84 | $8.07 | +2.30% |
| CHDRF | $498.65 | -4.58% | 89.96B | 15.44 | $32.29 | +2.94% |
| PPRUF | $200.00 | -4.76% | 24.52B | 19.29 | $10.37 | +3.54% |
Stock Comparison
EATR vs HESAF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 294.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while HESAF trades at $2,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 57.20. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs HESAY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 288.39B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while HESAY trades at $275.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs LVMHF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 274.76B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while LVMHF trades at $550.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs LVMUY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 274.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while LVMUY trades at $109.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CFRHF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 116.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CFRHF trades at $198.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CFRUY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 115.23B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CFRUY trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CHDRY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 92.23B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CHDRY trades at $127.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CHDRF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 89.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CHDRF trades at $498.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PPRUF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 24.52B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PPRUF trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PPRUY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 24.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PPRUY trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PRDSY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PRDSY trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PRDSF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15.69B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PRDSF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CJEWF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 14.68B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CJEWF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CJEWY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 14.63B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CJEWY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PNDZF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PNDZF trades at $151.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SWGAY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SWGAY trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SWGAF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 9.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SWGAF trades at $180.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SWGNF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SWGNF trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BCUCY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 8.15B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BCUCY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BBRYF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 5.05B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BBRYF trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -50.43. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BURBY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BURBY trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -46.89. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs PANDY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs LKFLF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while LKFLF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs WOSGF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while WOSGF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SFRGY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SFRGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SFRGF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SFRGF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CHOWF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 591.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CHOWF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs ZAPNF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs ORWHF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.55M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs DCOHF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs TSSJF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.33M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs FLLIY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CTTLF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 134.28M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs EPRJF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 108.85M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while EPRJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs HENGF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.41M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs CEBTF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.33M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs MNNGF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 61.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs MENEF Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 23.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while MENEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs MDNL Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.49M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs MAJJ Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BANI Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs HENGY Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs SSOK Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 916031.00. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while SSOK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BRGO Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289833.00. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs AVEW Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125001.00. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs MASN Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 109034.00. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.
EATR vs BRGOD Comparison
EATR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EATR stands at 2.46M. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78066.00. Regarding current trading prices, EATR is priced at $0.00, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EATR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, EATR's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EATR is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EATR.