DynaResource, Inc.
DynaResource, Inc. (DYNR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DYNR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNR | $1.35 | -15.09% | 39.6M | -10.38 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.8B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $19.35 | -1.55% | 14.2B | 101.32 | $0.19 | +3.86% |
| ANGPY | $8.28 | -5.26% | 13B | 33.00 | $0.25 | +7.79% |
| IMPUY | $10.28 | -2.10% | 9.2B | -9.53 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $9.80 | -7.98% | 8.8B | -9.16 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.05 | +0.00% | 5.5B | -34.30 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.88 | -1.88% | 3.5B | 20.18 | $0.44 | +0.90% |
| GMINF | $12.78 | -2.19% | 2.9B | 24.57 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DYNR vs AUXIF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check AUXIF's competition here
DYNR vs FNLPF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while FNLPF trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 101.32. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check FNLPF's competition here
DYNR vs ANGPY Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ANGPY trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ANGPY's competition here
DYNR vs IMPUY Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while IMPUY trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check IMPUY's competition here
DYNR vs IMPUF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while IMPUF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and IMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPUF's competition here
DYNR vs OICT Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while OICT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check OICT's competition here
DYNR vs NMPNF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPNF's competition here
DYNR vs JINFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while JINFF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check JINFF's competition here
DYNR vs GMINF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GMINF trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check GMINF's competition here
DYNR vs POYYF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POYYF's competition here
DYNR vs ZMPLF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ZMPLF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ZMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMPLF's competition here
DYNR vs AUCOY Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check AUCOY's competition here
DYNR vs GLGDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 528.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GLGDF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 161.60. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check GLGDF's competition here
DYNR vs ABBRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ABBRF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -36.18. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ABBRF's competition here
DYNR vs TPRFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check TPRFF's competition here
DYNR vs GOTRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GOTRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check GOTRF's competition here
DYNR vs SAPLF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SAPLF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and SAPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAPLF's competition here
DYNR vs BRVMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 258.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BRVMF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BRVMF's competition here
DYNR vs TIHRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check TIHRF's competition here
DYNR vs PLLHF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and PLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLHF's competition here
DYNR vs SLVTF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SLVTF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -43.36. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SLVTF's competition here
DYNR vs IAUFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while IAUFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUFF's competition here
DYNR vs HEGLF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while HEGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and HEGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGLF's competition here
DYNR vs BOCOF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BOCOF's competition here
DYNR vs BKRRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BKRRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BKRRF's competition here
DYNR vs SDRC Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SDRC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -320.10. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SDRC's competition here
DYNR vs CTNXF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check CTNXF's competition here
DYNR vs XANAF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while XANAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check XANAF's competition here
DYNR vs ARRKF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ARRKF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -25.86. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ARRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARRKF's competition here
DYNR vs ADYRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ADYRF's competition here
DYNR vs CHPGF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while CHPGF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -45.63. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check CHPGF's competition here
DYNR vs PAASF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 82.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PAASF's competition here
DYNR vs LUCRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while LUCRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check LUCRF's competition here
DYNR vs EMPYF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while EMPYF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 66.02. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check EMPYF's competition here
DYNR vs OCGSF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while OCGSF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check OCGSF's competition here
DYNR vs VLMGF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while VLMGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -69.35. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check VLMGF's competition here
DYNR vs INMNF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and INMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INMNF's competition here
DYNR vs PDLMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PDLMF's competition here
DYNR vs SMDRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SMDRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SMDRF's competition here
DYNR vs CAPTF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while CAPTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -32.25. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check CAPTF's competition here
DYNR vs DNCVF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while DNCVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check DNCVF's competition here
DYNR vs SSVFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SSVFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SSVFF's competition here
DYNR vs ORVMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ORVMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ORVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORVMF's competition here
DYNR vs SNNGF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SNNGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SNNGF's competition here
DYNR vs BRGC Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BRGC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BRGC's competition here
DYNR vs ACKRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ACKRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ACKRF's competition here
DYNR vs KDKCF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while KDKCF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check KDKCF's competition here
DYNR vs PDIV Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PDIV trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PDIV's competition here
DYNR vs TSORF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and TSORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSORF's competition here
DYNR vs SSVRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SSVRF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -33.10. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SSVRF's competition here
DYNR vs TEUTF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TEUTF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check TEUTF's competition here
DYNR vs WAMFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while WAMFF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and WAMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAMFF's competition here
DYNR vs EQMEF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while EQMEF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check EQMEF's competition here
DYNR vs BBBXF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BBBXF's competition here
DYNR vs ELRFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ELRFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ELRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELRFF's competition here
DYNR vs HMRRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRRF's competition here
DYNR vs FCSUF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check FCSUF's competition here
DYNR vs ATEPF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ATEPF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ATEPF's competition here
DYNR vs SCTSF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SCTSF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SCTSF's competition here
DYNR vs TBXXF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TBXXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and TBXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBXXF's competition here
DYNR vs SMOFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SMOFF's competition here
DYNR vs OKPRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check OKPRF's competition here
DYNR vs MMNGF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -16.81. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check MMNGF's competition here
DYNR vs TLSMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check TLSMF's competition here
DYNR vs NAUFF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while NAUFF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check NAUFF's competition here
DYNR vs QGLDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, QGLDF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while QGLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas QGLDF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QGLDF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and QGLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QGLDF's competition here
DYNR vs VIPRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while VIPRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and VIPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIPRF's competition here
DYNR vs ACRG Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check ACRG's competition here
DYNR vs VTXXF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check VTXXF's competition here
DYNR vs GBRRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and GBRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBRRF's competition here
DYNR vs DNRSF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while DNRSF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check DNRSF's competition here
DYNR vs ASLRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ASLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASLRF's competition here
DYNR vs GLDRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check GLDRF's competition here
DYNR vs WEXPF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while WEXPF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check WEXPF's competition here
DYNR vs EMPPF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check EMPPF's competition here
DYNR vs GSMGF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and GSMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSMGF's competition here
DYNR vs SHGDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SHGDF's competition here
DYNR vs MRZLF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while MRZLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check MRZLF's competition here
DYNR vs AGMRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AGMRF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check AGMRF's competition here
DYNR vs LGCXF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while LGCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check LGCXF's competition here
DYNR vs AGLDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and AGLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGLDF's competition here
DYNR vs URVNF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check URVNF's competition here
DYNR vs PNTRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PNTRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PNTRF's competition here
DYNR vs KGFMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while KGFMF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check KGFMF's competition here
DYNR vs AUCUF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check AUCUF's competition here
DYNR vs HGLD Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check HGLD's competition here
DYNR vs MERG Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check MERG's competition here
DYNR vs THMG Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while THMG trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and THMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THMG's competition here
DYNR vs PVGDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PVGDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PVGDF's competition here
DYNR vs CTMCF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while CTMCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check CTMCF's competition here
DYNR vs VOYRF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check VOYRF's competition here
DYNR vs CJIMF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check CJIMF's competition here
DYNR vs AUSVF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check AUSVF's competition here
DYNR vs SEKZF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SEKZF's competition here
DYNR vs BYRG Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check BYRG's competition here
DYNR vs ESGLF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while ESGLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR and ESGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESGLF's competition here
DYNR vs FREDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while FREDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check FREDF's competition here
DYNR vs SBMCF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while SBMCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check SBMCF's competition here
DYNR vs PGLDF Comparison July 2025
DYNR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DYNR stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DYNR is priced at $1.35, while PGLDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DYNR currently has a P/E ratio of -10.38, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, DYNR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DYNR is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DYNR.Check PGLDF's competition here