ams AG
ams AG (DQW1.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DQW1.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQW1.DE | €8.47 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVD.DE | €152.54 | -3.76% | 3.8T | 37.31 | €4.19 | +0.02% |
| NVD.F | €152.58 | -3.74% | 3.7T | 36.52 | €4.19 | +0.02% |
| TSFA.F | €290.50 | -4.28% | 1.5T | 32.26 | €8.99 | +0.71% |
| 1YD.DE | €281.60 | -2.46% | 1.4T | 71.12 | €4.10 | +0.71% |
| ASME.DE | €1,100.20 | -7.19% | 441.7B | 46.43 | €24.68 | +0.58% |
| MTE.DE | €316.65 | -7.74% | 377.1B | 37.10 | €9.03 | +0.12% |
| HY9H.F | €486.00 | -7.95% | 350.8B | 17.34 | €29.29 | +0.12% |
| AMD.DE | €164.04 | -5.69% | 279.2B | 76.46 | €2.24 | N/A |
| AP2.DE | €274.90 | -8.44% | 230.9B | 34.72 | €8.38 | +0.54% |
Stock Comparison
DQW1.DE vs NVD.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while NVD.DE trades at €152.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check NVD.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs NVD.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while NVD.F trades at €152.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check NVD.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs TSFA.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while TSFA.F trades at €290.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check TSFA.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs 1YD.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while 1YD.DE trades at €281.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 71.12. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs ASME.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 441.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while ASME.DE trades at €1,100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 46.43. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check ASME.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs MTE.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 377.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while MTE.DE trades at €316.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check MTE.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs HY9H.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, HY9H.F has a market cap of 350.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while HY9H.F trades at €486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HY9H.F's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HY9H.F's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to HY9H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check HY9H.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs AMD.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 279.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while AMD.DE trades at €164.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 76.46. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check AMD.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs AP2.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 230.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while AP2.DE trades at €274.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check AP2.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs INL.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while INL.DE trades at €36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -771.00. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to INL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check INL.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs INL.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while INL.F trades at €36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -750.20. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check INL.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs KLA.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while KLA.DE trades at €1,146.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check KLA.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs TII.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while TII.DE trades at €165.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check TII.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs ANL.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while ANL.DE trades at €265.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check ANL.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs QCI.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while QCI.DE trades at €115.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check QCI.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs LAR.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check LAR.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs IFX.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while IFX.DE trades at €38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check IFX.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs VNX.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while VNX.DE trades at €172.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check VNX.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs MCP.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while MCP.DE trades at €55.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is -218.04. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check MCP.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs SGM.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while SGM.DE trades at €26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 181.07. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check SGM.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs MXI.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check MXI.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs CR6.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check CR6.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs AWM.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while AWM.DE trades at €47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check AWM.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs 2QO.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs WAF1.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs AIXA.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while AIXA.DE trades at €28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs AIX2.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while AIX2.F trades at €53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check AIX2.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs RMB.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check RMB.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs ELG.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while ELG.DE trades at €138.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check ELG.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs WAF.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while WAF.DE trades at €50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is -55.22. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check WAF.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs SOH1.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while SOH1.F trades at €40.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 147.18. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check SOH1.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs CPIA.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while CPIA.F trades at €31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 87.03. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check CPIA.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs SMHN.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 995.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while SMHN.DE trades at €50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs SIS.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while SIS.DE trades at €53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check SIS.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs CTNK.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while CTNK.F trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check CTNK.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs M5Z.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs M5Z.F Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, M5Z.F has a market cap of 728.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while M5Z.F trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M5Z.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to M5Z.F's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check M5Z.F's competition here
DQW1.DE vs XIX.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, XIX.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while XIX.DE trades at €191.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIX.DE's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XIX.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to XIX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check XIX.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs MVIN.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is less volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
DQW1.DE vs DLG.DE Comparison March 2026
DQW1.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DQW1.DE stands at 0. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DQW1.DE is priced at €8.47, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DQW1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, DQW1.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DQW1.DE is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DQW1.DE.Check DLG.DE's competition here