Doms Industries Limited
Doms Industries Limited (DOMS.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DOMS.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: NaN Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOMS.BO | ₹2,326.15 | +0.00% | 140.2B | 63.33 | ₹36.48 | +0.14% |
| HEXAWARE.NS | ₹470.80 | +0.00% | 141.4B | 22.98 | ₹20.49 | N/A |
| SAFARIND.BO | ₹1,915.30 | -0.29% | 91.1B | 1394.97 | ₹1.37 | N/A |
| SHREMINVIT.NS | ₹118.00 | +0.00% | 72.1B | 7.51 | ₹15.72 | N/A |
| ENTERO.NS | ₹1,091.10 | +0.00% | 47B | 42.27 | ₹25.53 | N/A |
| ORIANA.NS | ₹2,078.30 | +0.00% | 43.1B | 26.71 | ₹79.49 | N/A |
| MEDIASSIST.NS | ₹411.50 | +0.00% | 30.1B | 51.64 | ₹7.84 | N/A |
| RPTECH.NS | ₹361.45 | +0.00% | 23.7B | 9.80 | ₹36.66 | +1.11% |
| ALPEXSOLAR.NS | ₹806.65 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 15.82 | ₹50.98 | N/A |
| VMARCIND.NS | ₹728.00 | +0.00% | 17.7B | 29.28 | ₹24.74 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DOMS.BO vs HEXAWARE.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SAFARIND.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SHREMINVIT.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SHREMINVIT.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SHREMINVIT.NS trades at ₹118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SHREMINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHREMINVIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. DOMS.BO has daily volatility of 2.91 and SHREMINVIT.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check SHREMINVIT.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ENTERO.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ENTERO.NS has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ENTERO.NS trades at ₹1,091.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ENTERO.NS's P/E ratio is 42.27. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENTERO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ENTERO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ENTERO.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ORIANA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹2,078.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs MEDIASSIST.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹411.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 51.64. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs RPTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, RPTECH.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while RPTECH.NS trades at ₹361.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas RPTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to RPTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check RPTECH.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ALPEXSOLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ALPEXSOLAR.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ALPEXSOLAR.NS trades at ₹806.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ALPEXSOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALPEXSOLAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ALPEXSOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ALPEXSOLAR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹728.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs AIMTRON.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, AIMTRON.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while AIMTRON.NS trades at ₹824.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas AIMTRON.NS's P/E ratio is 61.31. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AIMTRON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to AIMTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check AIMTRON.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KRISHNADEF.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KRISHNADEF.NS trades at ₹1,157.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KRISHNADEF.NS's P/E ratio is 53.19. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRISHNADEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KRISHNADEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KRISHNADEF.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹369.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -28.19. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GRNLAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GRNLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GRNLAMIND.BO trades at ₹556.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GRNLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNLAMIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GRNLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GRNLAMIND.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VINYAS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VINYAS.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VINYAS.NS trades at ₹980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VINYAS.NS's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VINYAS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to VINYAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VINYAS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KODYTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KODYTECH.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KODYTECH.NS trades at ₹918.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KODYTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 71.93. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KODYTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KODYTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KODYTECH.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs LEMERITE.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, LEMERITE.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while LEMERITE.NS trades at ₹446.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas LEMERITE.NS's P/E ratio is 94.03. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LEMERITE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to LEMERITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check LEMERITE.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs TAC.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, TAC.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while TAC.NS trades at ₹584.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas TAC.NS's P/E ratio is 74.30. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TAC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to TAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check TAC.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KARNIKA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KARNIKA.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KARNIKA.NS trades at ₹146.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KARNIKA.NS's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KARNIKA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KARNIKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KARNIKA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹224.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GPTHEALTH.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GPTHEALTH.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GPTHEALTH.NS trades at ₹127.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GPTHEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPTHEALTH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GPTHEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GPTHEALTH.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VILAS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VILAS.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VILAS.NS trades at ₹422.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VILAS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VILAS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to VILAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VILAS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs REMUS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, REMUS.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while REMUS.NS trades at ₹705.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas REMUS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REMUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to REMUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check REMUS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ACCENTMIC.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ACCENTMIC.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ACCENTMIC.NS trades at ₹336.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ACCENTMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCENTMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ACCENTMIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ACCENTMIC.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PARIN.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PARIN.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PARIN.NS trades at ₹690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PARIN.NS's P/E ratio is 103.20. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PARIN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to PARIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PARIN.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs DENTALKART.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, DENTALKART.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while DENTALKART.NS trades at ₹500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas DENTALKART.NS's P/E ratio is 45.96. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DENTALKART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to DENTALKART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check DENTALKART.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ZTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ZTECH.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ZTECH.NS trades at ₹537.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ZTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to ZTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ZTECH.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GGBL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GGBL.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GGBL.NS trades at ₹280.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GGBL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to GGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GGBL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs APS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, APS.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while APS.NS trades at ₹337.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas APS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to APS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check APS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs DPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.89. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KILPEST.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KILPEST.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KILPEST.BO trades at ₹808.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KILPEST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KILPEST.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KILPEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KILPEST.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs BAHETI.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, BAHETI.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while BAHETI.NS trades at ₹600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas BAHETI.NS's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAHETI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to BAHETI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check BAHETI.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs MOS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, MOS.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while MOS.NS trades at ₹21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas MOS.NS's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to MOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check MOS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KRITIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs BASILIC.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, BASILIC.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while BASILIC.NS trades at ₹243.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas BASILIC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BASILIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to BASILIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check BASILIC.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs CELLECOR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, CELLECOR.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while CELLECOR.NS trades at ₹26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas CELLECOR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CELLECOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to CELLECOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check CELLECOR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GICL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GICL.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GICL.NS trades at ₹48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GICL.NS's P/E ratio is 165.86. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GICL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to GICL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GICL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹523.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GIRIRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GIRIRAJ.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GIRIRAJ.NS trades at ₹150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GIRIRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIRIRAJ.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GIRIRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GIRIRAJ.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PCCL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PCCL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PCCL.NS trades at ₹202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to PCCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PCCL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SJLOGISTIC.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SJLOGISTIC.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SJLOGISTIC.NS trades at ₹330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SJLOGISTIC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SJLOGISTIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SJLOGISTIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SJLOGISTIC.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs UNIHEALTH.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, UNIHEALTH.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while UNIHEALTH.NS trades at ₹313.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas UNIHEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNIHEALTH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to UNIHEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check UNIHEALTH.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹214.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs EFFWA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, EFFWA.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while EFFWA.NS trades at ₹210.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas EFFWA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFFWA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to EFFWA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check EFFWA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VIVIANA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VIVIANA.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VIVIANA.NS trades at ₹756.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VIVIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIVIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to VIVIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VIVIANA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VINSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VINSYS.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VINSYS.NS trades at ₹320.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VINSYS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to VINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VINSYS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs COOLCAPS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, COOLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while COOLCAPS.NS trades at ₹34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas COOLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COOLCAPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to COOLCAPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check COOLCAPS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ABSMARINE.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ABSMARINE.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ABSMARINE.NS trades at ₹174.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ABSMARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABSMARINE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ABSMARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ABSMARINE.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs VISHNUINFR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, VISHNUINFR.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while VISHNUINFR.NS trades at ₹169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas VISHNUINFR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VISHNUINFR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to VISHNUINFR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check VISHNUINFR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PRAMARA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PRAMARA.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PRAMARA.NS trades at ₹351.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PRAMARA.NS's P/E ratio is 70.76. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRAMARA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to PRAMARA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PRAMARA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PROV.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PROV.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PROV.NS trades at ₹1,208.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PROV.NS's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to PROV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PROV.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs MEGATHERM.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, MEGATHERM.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while MEGATHERM.NS trades at ₹213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas MEGATHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEGATHERM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGATHERM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check MEGATHERM.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SHIVAUM.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SHIVAUM.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SHIVAUM.NS trades at ₹326.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SHIVAUM.NS's P/E ratio is 79.62. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHIVAUM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVAUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SHIVAUM.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SYSTANGO.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SYSTANGO.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SYSTANGO.NS trades at ₹275.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SYSTANGO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYSTANGO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SYSTANGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SYSTANGO.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ATMASTCO.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ATMASTCO.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ATMASTCO.NS trades at ₹152.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ATMASTCO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATMASTCO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ATMASTCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ATMASTCO.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GRETEX.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GRETEX.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GRETEX.NS trades at ₹252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GRETEX.NS's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRETEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GRETEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GRETEX.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs CGRAPHICS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, CGRAPHICS.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while CGRAPHICS.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas CGRAPHICS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGRAPHICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to CGRAPHICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check CGRAPHICS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹146.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs HIGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, HIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while HIGREEN.NS trades at ₹142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas HIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIGREEN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to HIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check HIGREEN.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs WSIND.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PRIZOR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PRIZOR.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PRIZOR.NS trades at ₹305.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PRIZOR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRIZOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to PRIZOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PRIZOR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 71.05. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ANNAPURNA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ANNAPURNA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ANNAPURNA.NS trades at ₹187.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ANNAPURNA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANNAPURNA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ANNAPURNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ANNAPURNA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs INFINIUM.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, INFINIUM.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while INFINIUM.NS trades at ₹214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas INFINIUM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFINIUM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to INFINIUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check INFINIUM.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs INFOLLION.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, INFOLLION.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while INFOLLION.NS trades at ₹342.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas INFOLLION.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFOLLION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to INFOLLION.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check INFOLLION.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs TECHLABS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, TECHLABS.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while TECHLABS.NS trades at ₹189.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas TECHLABS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHLABS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to TECHLABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check TECHLABS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs MASON.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, MASON.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while MASON.NS trades at ₹174.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas MASON.NS's P/E ratio is 95.21. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MASON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to MASON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check MASON.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ESFL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ESFL.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ESFL.NS trades at ₹129.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ESFL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESFL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ESFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ESFL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs EFACTOR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, EFACTOR.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while EFACTOR.NS trades at ₹251.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas EFACTOR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFACTOR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to EFACTOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check EFACTOR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SEJAL.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SEJAL.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SEJAL.BO trades at ₹307.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SEJAL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEJAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to SEJAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SEJAL.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SAHAJSOLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SAHAJSOLAR.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SAHAJSOLAR.NS trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SAHAJSOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAHAJSOLAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SAHAJSOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SAHAJSOLAR.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs RBMINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, RBMINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while RBMINFRA.NS trades at ₹353.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas RBMINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBMINFRA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to RBMINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check RBMINFRA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SHREEKARNI.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SHREEKARNI.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SHREEKARNI.NS trades at ₹430.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SHREEKARNI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHREEKARNI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to SHREEKARNI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SHREEKARNI.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹125.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs TRANSTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, TRANSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while TRANSTEEL.NS trades at ₹139.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas TRANSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRANSTEEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check TRANSTEEL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs DUGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, DUGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while DUGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas DUGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 71.75. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUGLOBAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to DUGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check DUGLOBAL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PHANTOMFX.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PHANTOMFX.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PHANTOMFX.NS trades at ₹213.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PHANTOMFX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHANTOMFX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to PHANTOMFX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PHANTOMFX.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs CPS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, CPS.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while CPS.NS trades at ₹1,268.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas CPS.NS's P/E ratio is 1601.27. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to CPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check CPS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs YASHOPTICS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, YASHOPTICS.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while YASHOPTICS.NS trades at ₹116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas YASHOPTICS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YASHOPTICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to YASHOPTICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check YASHOPTICS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs DYNAMIC.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, DYNAMIC.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while DYNAMIC.NS trades at ₹129.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas DYNAMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DYNAMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check DYNAMIC.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SHEETAL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SHEETAL.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SHEETAL.NS trades at ₹249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SHEETAL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHEETAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to SHEETAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SHEETAL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs WTICAB.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, WTICAB.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while WTICAB.NS trades at ₹117.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas WTICAB.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTICAB.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to WTICAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check WTICAB.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs CHAVDA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, CHAVDA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while CHAVDA.NS trades at ₹106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas CHAVDA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHAVDA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to CHAVDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check CHAVDA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ARIHANTACA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ARIHANTACA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ARIHANTACA.NS trades at ₹445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ARIHANTACA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.18. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARIHANTACA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANTACA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ARIHANTACA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs SKP.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while SKP.NS trades at ₹165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 50.61. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check SKP.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs AVPINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, AVPINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while AVPINFRA.NS trades at ₹105.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas AVPINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVPINFRA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to AVPINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check AVPINFRA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs FELIX.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, FELIX.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while FELIX.NS trades at ₹195.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas FELIX.NS's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FELIX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to FELIX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check FELIX.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GSMFOILS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GSMFOILS.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GSMFOILS.NS trades at ₹206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GSMFOILS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GSMFOILS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GSMFOILS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GSMFOILS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs LAKSHVILAS.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, LAKSHVILAS.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while LAKSHVILAS.NS trades at ₹7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas LAKSHVILAS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAKSHVILAS.NS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to LAKSHVILAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check LAKSHVILAS.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs CMNL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, CMNL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while CMNL.NS trades at ₹110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas CMNL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMNL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to CMNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check CMNL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs GOYALSALT.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, GOYALSALT.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while GOYALSALT.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas GOYALSALT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOYALSALT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to GOYALSALT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check GOYALSALT.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹174.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs JAINAM.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is -106.67. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs TCL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, TCL.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while TCL.NS trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas TCL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to TCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check TCL.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs KOTYARK.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, KOTYARK.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while KOTYARK.NS trades at ₹242.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas KOTYARK.NS's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KOTYARK.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to KOTYARK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check KOTYARK.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs ANLON.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, ANLON.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while ANLON.NS trades at ₹396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas ANLON.NS's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANLON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to ANLON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check ANLON.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs MADHAVBAUG.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, MADHAVBAUG.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while MADHAVBAUG.NS trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas MADHAVBAUG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MADHAVBAUG.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to MADHAVBAUG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check MADHAVBAUG.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs PRATHAM.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, PRATHAM.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while PRATHAM.NS trades at ₹130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas PRATHAM.NS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRATHAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to PRATHAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check PRATHAM.NS's competition here
DOMS.BO vs AKSCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, AKSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while AKSCHEM.BO trades at ₹281.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas AKSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKSCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is less volatile compared to AKSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check AKSCHEM.BO's competition here
DOMS.BO vs IPSL.NS Comparison February 2026
DOMS.BO plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DOMS.BO stands at 140.2B. In comparison, IPSL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DOMS.BO is priced at ₹2,326.15, while IPSL.NS trades at ₹273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DOMS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 63.33, whereas IPSL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, DOMS.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPSL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DOMS.BO is more volatile compared to IPSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOMS.BO.Check IPSL.NS's competition here