Dynacor Group Inc.
Dynacor Group Inc. DNG.TO Peers
See (DNG.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNG.TO | CA$4.51 | -0.55% | 190.6M | 7.39 | CA$0.61 | +3.33% |
| NGT.TO | CA$78.63 | +3.31% | 87.5B | 13.08 | CA$6.01 | +1.77% |
| AEM.TO | CA$169.16 | +1.83% | 85.5B | 26.27 | CA$6.44 | +0.98% |
| WPM.TO | CA$124.59 | +1.29% | 56.5B | 66.98 | CA$1.86 | +0.73% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.33 | +2.98% | 50.4B | 16.48 | CA$1.78 | +1.90% |
| FNV.TO | CA$233.33 | +2.28% | 45B | 53.03 | CA$4.40 | +0.65% |
| K.TO | CA$21.47 | +1.47% | 26.3B | 16.02 | CA$1.34 | +0.78% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$73.87 | +1.21% | 17.8B | 24.30 | CA$3.04 | +2.18% |
| AGI.TO | CA$37.42 | -0.05% | 15.7B | 44.02 | CA$0.85 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
DNG.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NGT.TO trades at CA$78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AEM.TO trades at CA$169.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while WPM.TO trades at CA$124.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 66.98. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while FNV.TO trades at CA$233.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs K.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while K.TO trades at CA$21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while LUG.TO trades at CA$73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AGI.TO trades at CA$37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while EDV.TO trades at CA$44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -76.26. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while OR.TO trades at CA$36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 158.43. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ELD.TO trades at CA$29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while IMG.TO trades at CA$10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while OGC.TO trades at CA$7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while TXG.TO trades at CA$48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while KNT.TO trades at CA$16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 90.79. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while DPM.TO trades at CA$21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while WDO.TO trades at CA$20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ORA.TO trades at CA$37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CXB.TO trades at CA$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NG.TO trades at CA$6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -31.68. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SEA.TO trades at CA$20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -135.20. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -193.67. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CNL.TO trades at CA$13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 761.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 748.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 747.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -77.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 742.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 736.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 492.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -31.23. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 309.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -42.33. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 172.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs G.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while G.TO trades at CA$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs WG.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while PME.TO trades at CA$2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.
DNG.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison
DNG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNG.TO stands at 190.6M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DNG.TO is priced at CA$4.51, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.39, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, DNG.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DNG.TO is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNG.TO.