Diageo plc

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 65.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DGEAF trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, STZ has a market cap of 33.38B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while STZ trades at $187.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas STZ's P/E ratio is -416.71. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to STZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to STZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 27.54B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while PRNDY trades at $21.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 27.04B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while PDRDF trades at $107.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, BF-A has a market cap of 16.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while BF-A trades at $34.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas BF-A's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BF-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to BF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, BF-B has a market cap of 16.22B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while BF-B trades at $34.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas BF-B's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BF-B's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to BF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TBVPF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TBVPF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TBVPF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TBVPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to TBVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DVCMY trades at $6.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DVDCF trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while EDVGF trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TSRYY trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while BCCLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TSRYF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to TSRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while REMYF trades at $54.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while REMYY trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to DSTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, NAPA has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while NAPA trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas NAPA's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NAPA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to NAPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.30M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to LPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, MGPI has a market cap of 681.08M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while MGPI trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas MGPI's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MGPI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to MGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.35M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to GBSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 301.69M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while CRBBF trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 301.49M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while CBYDF trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.75M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to BVDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, EPSM has a market cap of 149.33M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while EPSM trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas EPSM's P/E ratio is 225.40. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EPSM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to EPSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 146.76M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while ADWPF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to ADWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 112.31M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while CWGL trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 136.25. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 87.67M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while AUVGF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 82.63M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TBVPY trades at $32.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 72.38M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while NWINF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to NWINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 68.45M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while MJWNY trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 57.81M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, WVVI has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while WVVI trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas WVVI's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WVVI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to WVVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.41M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while CATWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to CATWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, WVVIP has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while WVVIP trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas WVVIP's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WVVIP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to WVVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.76M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while VDKB trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, BLNE has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while BLNE trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas BLNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BLNE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to BLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DWWEF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, VINE has a market cap of 9.77M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while VINE trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas VINE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VINE's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to VINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, LQR has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while LQR trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas LQR's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LQR's ROE of -281517.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to LQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, AMZE has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while AMZE trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas AMZE's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AMZE's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to AMZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.10M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SVIN trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, EAST has a market cap of 4.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while EAST trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas EAST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EAST's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to EAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while THST trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to THST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while IFBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to IFBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 1.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while RSAU trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, VWE has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while VWE trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas VWE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VWE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to VWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.33M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while ASCC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while EWRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 877302.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SRSG trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to SRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 579162.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SBES trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to SBES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, VWEWW has a market cap of 567509.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while VWEWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas VWEWW's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VWEWW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to VWEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 466308.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 323978.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to SHNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 213728.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DKTS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DKTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 92627.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while MLMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to MLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86412.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while TGRR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 10794.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while ICNB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 2783.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while DKAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74.00. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while FPWM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, STZ-B comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while STZ-B trades at $310.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas STZ-B's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to STZ-B's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is more volatile compared to STZ-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.

DEO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DEO stands at 62.87B. In comparison, WBEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DEO is priced at $113.16, while WBEV trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DEO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.52, whereas WBEV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DEO's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEO is less volatile compared to WBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEO.