Bank of Ireland Group PLC
Bank of Ireland Group PLC (DD7E.IR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DD7E.IR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DD7E.IR | €23.20 | +2.65% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BNP.PA | €80.12 | -2.14% | 89.3B | 7.88 | €10.29 | +9.10% |
| ACA.PA | €15.74 | -1.29% | 48B | 7.28 | €2.18 | +6.93% |
| GLE.PA | €60.68 | -4.26% | 45.5B | 9.16 | €6.80 | +2.73% |
| KBC.BR | €102.95 | -1.01% | 40.9B | 11.86 | €8.69 | +2.82% |
| XBBDC.MC | €3.16 | +1.28% | 33.4B | 9.03 | €0.35 | +0.98% |
| A5G.IR | €8.56 | -0.58% | 18.3B | 9.22 | €0.93 | +5.49% |
| BIRG.IR | €15.25 | -2.56% | 14.6B | 13.38 | €1.15 | +3.44% |
| BCP.LS | €0.81 | -1.25% | 12B | 11.54 | €0.07 | +3.71% |
| VLK.AS | €57.70 | -1.54% | 2.5B | 16.74 | €3.47 | +7.14% |
Stock Comparison
DD7E.IR vs BNP.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while BNP.PA trades at €80.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check BNP.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs ACA.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while ACA.PA trades at €15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check ACA.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs GLE.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while GLE.PA trades at €60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check GLE.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs KBC.BR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while KBC.BR trades at €102.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check KBC.BR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs XBBDC.MC Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while XBBDC.MC trades at €3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR and XBBDC.MC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
DD7E.IR vs A5G.IR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while A5G.IR trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check A5G.IR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs BIRG.IR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while BIRG.IR trades at €15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs BCP.LS Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while BCP.LS trades at €0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check BCP.LS's competition here
DD7E.IR vs VLK.AS Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while VLK.AS trades at €57.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check VLK.AS's competition here
DD7E.IR vs PTSB.IR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs IL0A.IR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CAF.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 881.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CAF.PA trades at €109.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CAF.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs MLCFM.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR and MLCFM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRBP2.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRBP2.PA trades at €27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CNF.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CNF.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CIV.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CIV.PA trades at €101.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CIV.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs BNB.BR Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while BNB.BR trades at €402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check BNB.BR's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CMO.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CMO.PA trades at €101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CMO.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRAV.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRAV.PA trades at €129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CAT31.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CAT31.PA trades at €111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CCN.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CCN.PA trades at €129.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CCN.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRLA.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRLA.PA trades at €76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRTO.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRTO.PA trades at €124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR and CRTO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRTO.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRSU.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRSU.PA trades at €195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRLO.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRLO.PA trades at €96.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs CRAP.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while CRAP.PA trades at €135.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs MLGRC.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while MLGRC.PA trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR and MLGRC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
DD7E.IR vs KN.PA Comparison April 2026
DD7E.IR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DD7E.IR stands at 0. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DD7E.IR is priced at €23.20, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DD7E.IR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, DD7E.IR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DD7E.IR is less volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DD7E.IR.Check KN.PA's competition here